البيت الابيض يحذر الكونغرس من أن الاعتراض على اتفاق مع ايران يمكن أن يؤدي الى حرب

USA need to putt there money where there mouth is. they did not attack syria, now they are speaking of iran ? haha

Unfortunately, Obama may be a very good lawyer but a leader he is not. In the latest round of the Geneva talks between P5+1 and Iran he was willing to accept a deal that does not include Iran's handing over of its 20% enriched Uranium and does not include a freeze to the Arak Plutonium reactor's construction.
Without those two conditions any six month deal to freeze Iran's nuclear activities is a bad deal. The French were correct in refusing it as they are the best positioned to make such a judgement based on their history of expertise in that area vis Iran's nuclear capabilities.

Yalla nuclear Iran, and then nuclear Saudi Arabia, Qatar, you name it. We already have Pakistan. Good way to shave off the population in the Middle East.

@-mr.black
I don't put much faith in that Israeli website because it is even to the right of Likud and Netanyahu. They make up stories most of the time and their analyses is completely self serving to their hard line ideology.

A better source would be something like ForeignPolicy site which presents a more balanced approach even if sometimes it too is self serving. Understand I am always skeptical of all media running stories to support their point of view. That is why I read many different sites and then form my opinions. I find the following URL closer to the truth:
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/11/10/how-france-scuttled-the-iran-deal-last-minute

Here is another URL to an article that I think better describes US Iranian latest tango and goals:
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/us-iran-talks-ideology-and-necessity?utm_source

@-mr.black
In the end, self interests of both the US and Iran dictate an accommodation between their two countries. Meanwhile, each side will jockey to get the better part of the deal. Leaving the Arak reactor and the 20% enriched Uranium off the table in this latest deal is an unforgivable negotiation blunder on the part of the Obama's US rushing head on to score some points with the American public to shore up Obama's job approval rating which lately have dipped below 39%.

In that light, the French were absolutely astute to refuse the deal even at the risk of coming across as spoilers. A deal that includes freezing the Arak reactor and tackles the 20% enriched Uranium would be one worth signing.

let them bomb each other... who cares, we r not iranians, israelis or anything else. it's none of our business.

The US Congress and its masters in Israel are so blind that they cannot see.
The US, they demand must up the ante on sanctions as a prelude to negotiations. That is a valid negotiation strategy given that we are giving up sanctions to get movement from Iran on its nuclear program.
When Iran ups the ante on its nuclear program, for the very same reason, following the same negotiation strategy, since it is the nuclear program that they must give on, the hardliners here call it a sign of insincerity. So guess what, the hardliners in Iran call our move the same thing and so negotiations do not happen from mutual mistrust over the mirrored negotiating strategy. Netanyhu must be happy to have foiled peaceful negotiations again.