جزر مارشال تسحب ترشيح اللواء جميل السيد لتمثيلها في اليونسكو

There was not enough evidence to keep him in jail flame not innocent (like there was no evidence to put aounis, lf, kateeb, ahrar, democratic left youth.. In jails at his time)..
Do u really think he has nothing to do with the assassination by the way?.. Not askng for a verdict (we are not juges) but only ur opininon...

sayyed is a criminal just like all syrian era collaborators are. This means that most of our heroic politicians are criminals that were in high positions. but this guy deserves no sympathy. 4 years in jail while cared for by the U.N., is nothing compared to what he did to those unfortunate souls that dared to question the syrian occupation of lebanon. he showed no mercy and treated them the same as the fanatical and violent Diniyyie terrorists. Tooz ala Jamil Sayyed and the karma he received.

Flame remeber 7 august, if FPM u should, what evidence did they have to trow us in jail then?...
Anyway i'm against arbitary detention, but i think he got a taste of his own medecine, u wont come tell me he was also some saint man, come on...
And yet deep inside do u think he had something to do with those assassinations? Really...

"i agree. but he's far from a criminal. he's just a tool who obeyed orders, just like jumby, murr, hariri, harb, moawad and all those who are now 'warriors of freedom' in M14."

You forgot to mention the biggest tools (Aoun, HA, Berri, yourself and the list goes on)

Jamil el Sayyed is responsible for beating Aounies up. This is what it has to do with Aoun. He's a corrupt criminal irrespective of his involvement in Hariri's case. Yet you defend him ?

Can you deny he deserves to rot in jail for him being a Syrian traitor and beating all freedom seekers including AOUNIES during his reign ?

Who's defending this guy? He was always a tool of oppression. What baffles me however is that most if not all politicians that all of you seem to back were also tools of oppression, corruption or murder. Why do you all have double standards? Why can't you judge people on what they have done for you rather than take to their defence. The whole concept of za3eem is retarded and backing them blindly is beneath each and every one of you for goodness sake. We are all educated people yet it seems we act like we've learned nothing. Someone tell me why please, honestly why?

And by the way what happened to innocent until proven guilty. I'm not saying he in fact is innocent but if he wasn't found guilty then in the eyes of the law in all modern states he would be innocent.
However having this guy nominated to UNESCO is just plain wrong on so many levels.

Well even like this it seems nicer than here..
Hv a good day thefact..