مؤتمر باريس: هولاند لدعم الجيش اللبناني وباسيل للقضاء على "داعش"
Read this story in Englishحضر لبنان الإثنين في في المؤتمر الدولي حول امن واستقرار العراق في باريس إذ كان كلمة لوزير الخارجية جبران باسيل دعا فيها إلى جهد لمكافحة الإرهاب بدون استثناء أحد، في حين شدد الرئيس الفرنسي فرانسوا هولاند على ضرورة دعم الجيش اللبناني.
ورأى هولاند في افتتاح المؤتمر بحضور 20 دولة ضرورة العمل "للحفاظ على وحدة لبنان وسيادته ودعم جيشه وتجهيزه".
هذا وتعهد المشاركون في المؤتمر بدعم بغداد في حربها ضد تنظيم الدولة الاسلامية بـ"كل الوسائل الضرورية" وضمنها العسكرية، بحسب البيان الختامي.
وفي اول ايلول، اعلنت الرئاسة الفرنسية اثر لقاء جرى في باريس بين الرئيس الفرنسي فرنسوا هولاند وولي العهد السعودي الامير سلمان بن عبد العزيز ان البلدين بصدد "وضع اللمسات الاخيرة" على عقد لتزويد الجيش اللبناني باسلحة فرنسية بقيمة ثلاثة مليارات دولار.
من جهته رأى باسيل أن "التفكير باحتواء "داعش" وهم إذ يجب القضاء عليها عسكريا وإيديولوجيا".
وأضاف "لا يمكن استثناء أحد من هذا الجهد الجماعي، كما لا يحق لأحد الاستقالة من هذا الواجب"، شارحا أن "هدفنا هو وضع حد نهائي للاإنسانية هذه المجموعات الإرهابية التي يستوجب القضاء الكامل عليها تجفيف مصادر تمويلها وتحديد رعاتها السياسيين والإيديولوجيين".
لكن باسيل أكد في الوقت عينه أهمية القيام بـ"مبادرة جامعة بأكبر وأوسع شكل ممكن، مدعومة من الأمم المتحدة ومتخذة في إطارها، على أن يكون طابعها سياسيا وقانونيا وعسكريا وإنسانيا في آن معا".
كما ذكّر بضرورة "الدعم الفوري للقوى المسلحة اللبنانية وهو الشرط اللازم لتفادي دخول لبنان في وضع يشبه ما يعيشه العراق حاليا".
وأضاف "لبنان يحتل موقعا متقدما في المعركة ضد الطائفية والإرهاب، ولطالما كان جنوده مثالا للمهنية والوطنية، كما أن أسلحتهم لم تقع يوما في أيد حليفة أو عدوة".
وتشن الولايات المتحدة منذ الثامن من اب ضربات جوية ضد معاقل التنظيم المتطرف في شمال العراق بينما تسلم دول عدة بينها فرنسا اسلحة الى المقاتلين الاكراد العراقيين الذين يتصدرون لمحاربة التنظيم.
وفي هذا الإطار عقد باسيل إجتماعا في باريس مع وزير خارجية الولايات المتحدة الأميركية جون كيري، وتم البحث في "الظروف والشروط المواكبة لدخول لبنان في الحرب على الإرهاب، وفي الدور السياسي والفكري والحواري الذي يلعبه لبنان في مواجهة الإرهاب" بحسب الوكالة "الوطنية للإعلام".
كما تطرقا إلى المساعدة التي يمكن للولايات المتحدة أن تقدمها للبنان "لمواجهة الإرهابيين على أرضهم".
وعقد أيضا لقاء جانبيا مع وزير خارجية روسيا سيرغي لافروف، وتم البحث في موضوع الحرب الشاملة على الإرهاب.
very nice all these conferences and these declarations.
I want to see barrels of bombs falling on these ISIS criminals so we finish from them once and for all, and be able to focus on our number one problem who is Assad.
Thank God it is Bassil and not Adnane mansour who is representing us. I think he is doing a good job.
Mansour would have insisted that the Syrian regime be included in the Coalition to fight ISIS for Lebanon to join the fight. So I agree with you lf.
the sources of their funding should be depleted completely and their political and ideological backers uncovered
this is the best solution
just a hint for france and the west
there is a nato member where all these terrorists transit and this member of nato is called turkey
and the funders also they are allies with usa and france and they are ksa and Qatar and Kuwait and uae
so .... act
and Beirut airport is closer than Irbil airport mr hollande so the arms to Lebanon should reach us before the kurds and free the same as kurds
nest ce pas mr hollande
Obama and his administration are pansies. When Assad gassed his own people, Obama had the green light for airstrikes but backed down. Now it's ISIS beheading American journalists and crucifying people in town squares and he's still dancing around trying to form a stupid coalition.
This is how the conversations are going:
US: we need to attack ISIS
UK: we second that statement, but we'll arm the Kurds
Australia: all right we'll provide 600 military personnel but we're keeping them in Dubai
Russia/Iran/Assad: Guys come on include us
Bassil: it must be destroyed militarily and ideologically...oh by the way can you give the Lebanese Army some weapons???
Politics at its finest.
It's hilarious how out of my whole comment you chose to argue one small part. But let's do it Flamer. First of all you're referring to the Ghouta attack. Chemical weapons have been used repeatedly in the war. Assad even dropped them from barrel bombs. What you're arguing is "Assad didn't do the Ghouta attack so he didn't do any." And that's nonsense Flamer. Why do you think Russia forced him to remove his chemical weapons? Just so he can look good by cooperating? Truth is Assad was the one with stockpiles of chemical weapons, to say that only rebels used them is a load of cack.
So now you're gonna say "but nickjames the Ghouta attack is what gave Obama the green light, and it wasn't even Assad." That may be a true statement, but he should have had the green light from the first chemical attacks.
Roar, seriously? I never said that no one will meet Bassil, stop changing my words. I said twice that as foreign minister he is obligated to meet his counterparts, that's his diplomatic duty. He is supposed to be Lebanon's top diplomat, of course he's meeting people. The argument all started when you said Bassil is our future president and that we need to respect him. When I asked you why you got into this whole ethos pitch how leaders "are more than happy to meet him." So I asked who likes meeting him, give me names. And you couldn't give a straight answer.
"Bassil is met by all sides & you need to accept reality & forget your personal love/hate posting."
So when you say we need to respect Bassil because he's our future president...Do you not call that love posting? Roar, you're the one who started the love posting. I asked you if you were smoking meth because it's outlandish to say that Bassil is our future president. If I said show respect to George Adwan he's our future president, you'd think I'm crazy al well. Point is you made such a stupid statement and went so far into defending it.
Here's the barrel bombs with chemical weapons. http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/13/syria-strong-evidence-government-used-chemicals-weapon
Flamer, I never said anything about the GCC committing troops to the anti-IS coalition. I'm not sure if they will, given the reasons you pointed out. I'm critical of Obama and his efforts to create a collation. It's a waste of time.
Lol participate in a ground offensive. That will never happen. And of course Flamer jumps on that idea and suggests that we believe such a thing would happen. It was funny when mffsc called him flame retard thrower. I thought about it and wondered how do you throw retards, before coming to the conclusion that only Flamer could do such a thing. Throwing retards, throwing retarded ideas, all the same thing. Just a retard thrower.
Retard thrower, that evidence is credible. Look at the pictures of the ruptured gas cylinders. But of course they're doctored so you won't lookit.
"so this leads us to the conclusion that obama is not an idiot and that the airstrikes are not for ISIS but are aimed at the force that is fighting ISIS: assad's force."
Obama had many other chances and reasons to bomb Assad, and he didn't. He wouldn't use ISIS as a cover to bomb Assad. Obama is arrogant who just doesn't want to bomb anyone. He goes on national television talking how ISIS is a cancer and he's gonna go after them, yet nothing has happened. Just talking about creating an IS-coaltion isn't going anywhere. The GCC nations aren't gonna contribute anything. The only countries who'd be in this coalition would be the US, UK, Australia and maybe Canada lol
To the Coalition,
Since a month I read about meetings and planning. I believe it is going on and on without action.
On the other side IS is acting.
Beside according to duties distribution I don't see ground troops, therefore I don't see any win ( just the opposite).
It is an ideological war and as such, the Muslim countries should act act effectively. If not the limited intervention of the west will be like pouring "petrol on fire".
In the following saying the comparison is in the meaning not in the character ( the dog that barks a lot does not bite)
الكلب يللي بيهبهب كتير ما بيعض
Lol he accused me and Texas of being the same person today. In his mind, all people with Aounophobia are considered the same person.
My comments are moderate, realistic and not offensive. I wonder why they are not displayed. Is it a must to please whoever from naharnet overseeing the comments?
A private answer is welcome .