إطلاق نار بين مسلحين سوريين ومقاتلي حزب الله في جرود بريتال

why not your dahyeh?

Well cause I'm not from dahyi. Hamra actually. I like living in the only Arab country with this amount of freedom and diversity, I don't want religion taking over. Y is that a bad thing?

Because the LAF have their hands tied up, by your beloved M14 politicians Mr. Judas

The army is forced to defend against this. HA brought this fight to Lebanon earlier than it would have come otherwise, cause it can't fight da3sh if Syria falls. But it's here now, and I don't want to wait till it's too late, they have to be eradicated. HA needs an Iranian Saudi agreement first.

Mystic, the Lebanese Forces came into being because of the stupid Palestinians who took over half the country (you should know this, the PLO took over all the Shia lands in the south). Also remember, at the beginning of the civil war, all the Sunnis abandoned the LAF. The LF under Gemayel were the true defenders of Lebanese Christians, who were being attacked by Palestinians and other Leftist radicals. After Gemayel is a different story. And the LF are not an active militia right now, which negates your whole argument.

Hezbollah participated in the civil war, even fought against Amal and the Syrian army. They then were allowed to keep their weapons to fight Israel in the south. Then when Israel withdrew Hezbollah said Israel withdrawal was not completed (Shebaa Farms were Syrian territory when Israel took it). Until this day Israel controls the farms, and Hezbollah has done nothing to "liberate it." Instead they go to Syria on Iran's orders to defend the mass murderer.

First of all I don't "follow" Geagea, or any of today's politicians. He's just as corrupt as the others, he doesn't represent what the Ouwwet originally stood for. Yes, Christians fought each other. Ouwwet killed Franjieh because he was a Syrian puppet, then went after Chamoun because he was an impediment to Christian unity (note that even Camille Chamoun didn't mind Gemayel going after the Tigers). As for the Aoun-Geagea conflict. Everyone but Aoun agreed to Ta'ef just to end the war. But then Aoun starts this War of Liberation

I did mention Israeli withdrawal from the south. May I add that the SLA under Antoine Lahd fled to Israel or else be captured by Hezbollah. Lahd was sentenced to death for treachery.

nickjames, So you justify the killing of Franjieh, because he was in your opinion a so called "Syrian Puppet" while your American/Israeli puppets massacred him and his family members. That's how I puzzle it, so what is the difference, when SSNP assassinated your Israeli/American puppet Bachir Gemayel in 1982? I see no difference at all, if we are having the "puppet" conversation now.

Mughniyeh, there's a difference between Franjieh being a Syrian puppet, and the LF taking weapons from Israel or else be slaughtered by Palestinians. I already said the LF needed Israel's weapons and Syrian intervention (at the beginning anyway). Gemayel even said in English in 1982 "all the foreigners, out: Syrians, Palestinians, and the Israelis, and even the UNIFIL; we don't need any foreign armed presence in this country." And that's why he was killed. Israel and Syria had the common interest to occupy Lebanon, they're both responsible for Gemayel's death.

Ofcourse nickjames, in your opinion Lebanese Forces are the rightous protectors of Lebanon, they had every right to do their massacres and slaughter women and children daily, and take weapons from Israel and USA with a good nodding.

That may sound very good for you, but in every sane persons mind, that sounds very opposite.

The LF also fought side by side with IDF on several occasions, also with a good nodding. What happend to you guys? Israel abandoned you, and now we have to hear you, whine about Hezbollahs arms every morning.

Mughniyeh, at one point LF were righteous. And every Lebanese should be against the large Palestinian presence instead of using it for political gains. So if being against Palestinian means collaborating with the Zionists, then so be it. Israel abandoning the LF has nothing to do with Hezbollah's arms. LF's arms were never the issue dividing Lebanon, because everyone had arms. Hezbollah is the only militia from the civil war that still has weapons, not to mention they're the only Lebanese militia to fight on foreign soil.

Mughniyeh, since the takfiri were gonna come to Lebanon sooner or later like you say, why couldn't Hezbollah wait for them to come to Lebanon? If they were a resistance, they would resist instead of deploy forces in Halab which is near Turkey.

Didn't you notice that all the bombs in Dahye didn't start until AFTER Nasrallah announced that he had fighters in Syria?? That's no coincidence

They are resisting now, by not letting it go further into Lebanese soil. You really are naive aren't you james?

You would rather sit and wait, while da3ish comes to murder your family and Lebanese people, or go fight the terrorists were they have their bases.

Hezbollah just took orders from Iran to help Assad. It had nothing to do with protecting Lebanon especially since the security deteriorated after Nasrallah's announcement

So the Takfiris wouldn't attack Lebanon, if Hezbollah stayed on the side lines yes? That is your story right.

Now how does that explain the murders on innocent Yazidis in Iraq? Or the Christians for instance? The takfiris are masters at killing unarmed civilians, such as the LF was.

But when the takfiris feel the slightest resistance, they go crazy and start blowing up car bombs in civilian areas.

"So the Takfiris wouldn't attack Lebanon, if Hezbollah stayed on the side lines yes? That is your story right."

I never said the takfiri wouldn't attack Lebanon. What I am saying is since they were going to attack Lebanon sooner or later, why couldn't Hezbollah just deploy on Lebanese border areas? Hezbollah would be operating in its legal capacity, which is called "resistance" like you guys always boast about.

You keep asking the same questions nickjames, now I will repeat myself for the last time, the resistance would rather suppress the takfiris away from Lebanese soil, so we do not have to deal with them here.

Your M14 politicians seems eager to defend these takfiris plots, since they are holding an umbrella over their takfiri heads.
But maybe that is what you want all along, you want the takfiris to enter Lebanon, and take it all over yes?

"the resistance would rather suppress the takfiris away from Lebanese soil, so we do not have to deal with them here."

See this is where you're twisted: they are not resisting if they are fighting in another country. Resisting means fighting someone who is occupying YOUR country, not someone else's country. Hezbollah was allowed to keep its weapons on grounds of "resistance." Fighting in another country (for whatever reason) is violating the agreement.

suppress the takfiris "away from Lebanese soil"???? So why is it that Hezbollah first admitted they were defending border villages, then Shia shrines, then justifying their outright participation. Hezbollah is fighting in Halab, is that not far away from Lebanese soil??