قطر تدعو لاعادة النظر في المبادرة العربية للسلام وعباس يؤكد التمسك بها

"The League has proposed a normalization with the Jewish state in return for its pullout from occupied lands, notably the Palestinian territories."
Pullout from occupied lands - Israel has already pulled out from Gaza, and all the territories under the control of the Palestinian Authority.
Pullout from occupied lands does not mean from ALL occupied lands, and any further withdrawal will take place after negotiations between Abu Mazen and Israel.

Unfortunately, as you know, demographically speaking, things have changed on the ground since 1967, and this has to be taken into account, especially as Abu Mazen has stated on more than one occasion that there will be no Jews living in the State of Palestine.
Israel has offered land for land, and also remember that Arafat was offered 97% of the land at Camp David and he refused.
Also note that just yesterday Khaled Mashaal proclaimed in Gaza that Hamas will not recognise Israels' right to exist and he see the Palestine state as from the Sea (Mediterranean) to the River (Jordan).
How will the State of Palestine, of which Gaza is a part, overcome this obstacle?

Most of the settlements in the WB would need to be dismantled. This will never be easy as Israel is a democracy and a decision like this would need to go through the Knesset. But if the Israeli public is convinced that this is necessary for long-term peace, then there is a chance that a decision like this could go through.
As for Hamas and Mashaal, they can be pressured one way or the other by the Arab states into accepting this settlement.
Remember that Syria, the country that has done the most to torpedo every peace initiative, is on the bring of collapse and is critically weakened right now. So Hamas has only Iran to lean on for support. The conditions are perfect for bold initiatives.
Also note that Arabs no longer pose existential threats to Israel. Iran does. Arabs and Israelis face a common threat, so it is in the interest of both people to make peace and cooperate.

Good job Phillipo! Besides, the 1967 borders are not defensible; i.e. every day you'll have armed thugs (hassoun, egyptians, syrians, iraqis, libyans, tunisians, algerians,even folks from pakistan; I mean anyone who is having a bad day, or constipation, in the name of religion...) will try to penetrate and hailing "ALLAH IS GREATER..." for more brothers in arms, either to fire an rpg, or blow him or herself up...As Phillipo said, torch will accept nothing less than from the river to the sea; therefore, good luck with peace => Sadly, Lebanon will continue to pay this price, in perpetuity...

I'm sure that you would find that if the Israelis could read this exchange of ideas, you would find that 90% of the "man in the street" would agree.
It is just a pity that the emir of Qatar when he visited the Gaza Strip didn't think to stop also in Israel. I think that it would have shown how intense his actions towards ME peace are.

Isn't it interesting that when one mentions the restart of peace talks between the Palestinian Authority (or State of Palestine - whatever you want to call it) and Israel, and suggesting that the Emir of Qatar should also have gone to Israel to attempt to push forward the Arab peace initiative, there are people who vote here against it.
These are the people who no matter what happens do not want peace between Israel and Palestine, and on the wider field peace between Israel and the Arab World.
Truedemocracy stated that "If you want peace, the government in Israel must change first." On the same level so must the government in Palestine, and more specifically in Gaza.