Netanyahu 'Gravely Concerned' about Deal with Iran and Hollande Sets 4 Demands for Accord
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةFrance will never tolerate nuclear proliferation, President Francois Hollande vowed Sunday as he arrived in Israel for a visit dominated by the dispute over Iran's nuclear program.
Hollande also made clear that the peace process was high on his agenda, saying France expected "gestures" from Israel over its construction of settlements in a bid to advance peace talks with the Palestinians.
France, and other major powers, held marathon talks with Iran in Geneva last weekend seeking to convince Tehran to freeze or curb its nuclear activities in exchange for some sanctions relief.
Israel expressed concern over the talks and warned Western powers against concessions, saying they will get a better deal if they keep the crippling sanctions in place or ratchet them up.
Hollande's visit, the first since he became president in 2012, will also see him travel to the Palestinian territories to discuss the peace talks which have limped along for three months with little signs of progress.
With his ratings flatlining back home, Hollande will also use his three-day trip to try to boost trade with Israel, which stood at 2.3 billion euros ($3 billion) in 2011.
Even before leaving the tarmac of Israel's Ben Gurion airport, Hollande addressed the question of Iran's disputed nuclear program, which Israel views as its greatest threat.
"France considers nuclear proliferation to be a menace, a danger, and in Iran particularly -- a menace to Israel, to the region and clearly a menace to the entire world," he said.
"This is why France will not tolerate nuclear proliferation. And for France, as long as we are not certain that Iran has decided to give up on nuclear weapons, we will continue with all our demands and with sanctions."
Hollande also laid out four demands which must be in place for an agreement with Iran.
"France is in favor of an interim agreement but on the basis of four points," he said.
"The first demand: put all the Iranian nuclear installations under international supervision, right now. Second point: suspend enrichment to 20 percent. Thirdly: to reduce the existing stock.
"And finally, to halt construction of the Arak (heavy water) plant. These are the points which for us are essential to guarantee any agreement," he said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later said he was "gravely concerned" that a deal between Iran and major powers will go through.
'Unflinching stance' on Iran
Last weekend's Geneva talks ended without an agreement, but negotiations between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany are set to resume on Wednesday.
France has been praised in Israel for taking a tougher stance than its Western partners at the Geneva talks, and Israeli leaders were expected to pressure Hollande to remain strong.
"I'm concerned, gravely concerned, that this deal will go through and in one stroke of the pen, it will reduce the sanctions on Iran -- sanctions that took years to put in place -- and in return for this, Iran gives practically nothing," Netanyahu told reporters, Hollande at his side.
"It's clear that this agreement is good only for Iran and that it's really bad for the rest of the world," he said. "Iran's dream deal is the world's nightmare."
And President Shimon Peres told Hollande "we are full of admiration for your unflinching stance to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons for mass destruction".
"France fully understands the need to place effective pressure on Iran until it ceases to be a threat," Peres also said.
Israel is the sole if undeclared nuclear power in the region, and along with world powers suspects Iran of trying to acquire a nuclear weapons capability -- an allegation Tehran denies.
Netanyahu will fly to Russia on Wednesday for talks with President Vladimir Putin, as part of his drive to prevent world leaders from handing Iran "the deal of the century" by easing the sanctions.
He will also discuss the matter in Jerusalem with US Secretary of State John Kerry on Friday.
"I hope we'll be able to convince our friends this week and in the following days to get a much better deal. It can be achieved," Netanyahu said.
Meanwhile Hollande urged Israel and the Palestinians to make "gestures" on the thorny issue of Jewish settlements building which is threatening to sabotage peace talks.
"There are still gestures that need to be made (by both sides)," he said.
On Monday, Hollande will meet Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas at his Ramallah, West Bank, headquarters.
On the eve of the meeting Abbas told Agence France Presse the Palestinians "are committed to continue the negotiations for nine months, regardless of what happens on the ground" and then would decide their next move.
The two sides resumed direct talks in July after a nearly three-year hiatus.
LOL, Hollande is getting very nervous. His project of arming and financing FSA-Al Qaeda (even when France is broke) is being torn apart, he's being destroyed in the presidency polls, and here he is trying to stay relevant in the negotiations, at least until he realizes he doesn't have a say in anything.
Tu peux rire autant que tu veux coco. Rira bien qui rira le dernier et je peux te garantir que le Liban en sortira perdant!
maybe hollande was talking about israel's nuclear weapons? that or he's a big hypocrite on zionist payroll
Not even Holland is on his way out.... In 3 years everyone will have forgotten His name just like Sarkozy's. You grant France too much power, unfortunately today Europe is in Merkel and Cameron's control.
France has the ability through its permanent seat on the UN Security Council to veto any deal that the rest of the P5+1 agrees upon.
You're talking about the right Russia and China keep abusing of for Syria? Or the one USA keeps abusing in favour of Israel.
Yes, France should play that game with Iran .... So one day this veto system gets abolished.
@ benzona
"Yes, France should play that game with Iran .... So one day this veto system gets abolished."
And a regional war or WWIII whereby large countries would begin to ignore the UN and international law altogether as international chaos ensues ...
That is why the veto none sense must go. There's no better way to achieve this goal than by crippling the UN bs.
No nukes were used in Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Sudan or Syria yet the region is in tatters. While the goal of a nuclear free MENA is a noble one there are many "goals" that need to be addressed first ...
@ speakfreely
"Leave Lebanon alone that's all we want."
And that is what I advocate. Unfortunately Lebanon's political elites have strong ties to foreign interests. In this case Mustaqbal with the Saudis that are waging terrorism in next door Syria while using Lebanon as a weapons and terrorist corridor and punishing all of Lebanon for their Fatwa against the Shia, specifically Hezbollah that has been a decisive force in their losing battle in Syria.
If you really and truly wanted Israel do disarm from the nuclear weapons that everyone claims she has, don't you think that a positive and highly productive first step would be to sign peace treaties with that country.
Whilst Arab states are threatening Israel there is no way that she would agree to this step but peace with all its neighbours might actually change the line of thought of the Israeli government.
You just can't have disarmament without peace.
You state "Israel is the only country in the Middle East with nukes".
Whether that statement is correct or not is irrelevent.
Has Israel EVER threatened to wipe another State of the face of the map ? - No.
Has Israel EVER been threatened to be wiped off off the face of the map ? - Yes.
So, without a full and meaningful peace would you give up your nuclear deterent? I know I wouldn't.
Southern, just a couple of questions for you.
1. How many innocent Lebanese civilians have been killed by Hizballah? How many by the then occupying Syrian forces? How many by Israel?
2. If you were the PM of Lebanon, had a nuclear weapon, and an enemy country threatened day after day to "wipe you off the face of the earth", would you turn round and give up your nuclear weapon? I very much doubt it.
3. If what you say about their not hesitating to Nuke countries is true, why didn't they do so during the Yom Kippur War?
"The ONLY country that was "wiped off the map" was Palestine by the invading terrorist zionists."
Bigjohn - could you please give us a geography / history lesson as to exact when there was a Palestine country.
Until 1918 it was part of the Ottoman Empire, from 1918 to 1948 it was part of the British Mandate.
In November 1947 the UN votes for the establishment of an independent Palestinian State, beside Israel, all the Arab States refused to accept it.
From 1948 - 1967 the West Bank was occupied by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Gaza Strip was occupied by the Arab Republic of Egypt.
Only after these two countries declared war on Israel in the Six Day war was the occupation taken over by Israel.
So, please, tell us exactly when there was a Palestine country.