March 14: Dialogue ‘Useless’, Appointments Consolidate Hizbullah Control on Security Agencies
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
The March 14 general-secretariat hinted on Wednesday that national dialogue became useless after the Syria-Hizbullah alliance decided on behalf of the Lebanese to prevent the state from owning arms.
“Dialogue became useless after three years of time wasting and after the regional-local axis decided on behalf of the Lebanese what their state should not possess,” the general-secretariat said following its weekly meeting.
It reiterated that the alliance’s participation in the national dialogue hinges on putting Hizbullah’s arms under the control of the state within a certain timeframe through the participation of the Arab League.
On the latest decisions taken by the cabinet, the conferees said “the security appointments consolidate the control of the (Hizbullah) statelet and its security on the legitimate security apparatuses.”
They also criticized “the state’s absence” from the operation that led to the release of the seven Estonian tourists on Thursday after they were moved between camps near the border with Syria and even into the neighboring country.
The March 14 statement deplored the government’s rejection to reveal the truth behind the kidnapping. “It should have committed itself to the (previous) decisions of the national dialogue and its policy statement by closing the camps of Palestinian militias allied with the Syrian regime.”
Turning to the statements made by PM Najib Miqati from south Lebanon on Security Council resolution 1701 on Saturday, the general-secretariat said: “The commitment to resolution 1701 that puts the security in the south in the custody of the army and UNIFIL, contradicts with the people, the army and the resistance equation” which was adopted by the cabinet in its policy statement.
It said that commitment to international resolutions should not be selective. “There is no commitment to resolution 1701 without any commitment to … resolution 1757” on the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, the statement added.
20 July 2011, 15:14
40
I mean, couldn't they come up with something else as ridiculous as they but that would be, at least, slightly believable? Come on! Talking about losers. This is a bunch of retards not just losers. And then they wonder why they have lost and are now lost. CAUSE THEY LOST IT!
20 July 2011, 15:15
15
smalldig, find a hobby. Or post something constructive. If you cant do that, this site is not for you.
20 July 2011, 15:39
12
th21, he hasn't even figured out how to single post yet, let him master that first and then try to tackle conversing on issues.
20 July 2011, 15:41
02
It is a big mistake to reject the dialog.
I think M14 have all the interest in going to the dialog, given that the Syrian Regime is very shaken and soon to fall, they'll reap a lot of concessions on major issues, including illegal arms whether with Hizb Allah, or Palestinians in and outside the the Camps and also in reinforcing the Lebanese State in face of all the mini-states.
Dialog is the best way forward. M14 should not be seen as refusing dialog. Dialog helps insuring that Hizb allah does not resort to his weapons to gain politically like they've been doing up till now.
I really think M14 should review their stance from the dialog and embrace it.
20 July 2011, 18:02
01
Charbel , i agree with you partially, sure dialogue is better than the language of the bullet, but when you have a gun pointed to your head and someone telling you lets talk, you cannot negotiate in a way that everybody is a winner, And when you ask him to remove the gun pointed to your head to talk equaly, he says he doesnt want to do anything about it and it is non negociable, This is whats happening ya charbel, Hezbollah doesnt want to negotiate on the real problem of the country, which is their weapons, i, personnally, dont think that hezbollah is in control of its own militia, the hariri murder was executed by hezbollah members that were out of control of Hassan nasrallah,some bad people close to them do whatever they want and flee to dahieh because they know nobody would dare go there.their weapons have become a burden to their reputation of resistance,and now there is no going back, do us a favor , disarm and help us catch your outlaws or your an accomplice to them.
20 July 2011, 21:19
01
Dialogue is performed with entities that have the same goals but do not agree on the methods.
In Lebanon’s case Hezbollah is an element tightly attached to the Iranian orders as declared by nassrallah on several occasions and has an ideological goal in which a pluralistic and democratic Lebanon does not exist. What dialogue could we have with such party? March 14th wasted 5 precious years trying to accommodate the monster till it grew back in strength and scared them out.
It is about time to say no to any compromise or dialogue with the largest threat to the Lebanese identity, Hezbollah.
20 July 2011, 22:00
00
I convey anyone who understands French to read this terrible tale in today's edition of the L 'Orient Le Jour; A Sdonian Baathist terrorizes the locals... (youtube video in the article! ) ==> http://tinyurl.com/42evbj8
