Analysts: More Unrest Likely for Gridlocked Lebanon
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةPolitically paralyzed by deep divisions exacerbated by the war in neighboring Syria, Lebanon is likely to see a continuing cycle of political violence, analysts say.
On Thursday, four people were killed and dozens others wounded in a bomb blast in the Beirut southern suburb of Haret Hreik, a stronghold of Hizbullah, less than a week after the assassination of former finance minister Mohammed Shatah, a member of the March 14 coalition.
The attacks were the latest in a string of incidents linked to the Syrian conflict that have strained Lebanon's fragile multi-sectarian political system.
"I expect an escalation of the deterioration in the security situation," said Hilal Khashan, a professor of political science at the American University in Beirut (AUB).
"The explosions are a direct consequence of the situation in Syria and finding a solution to the crisis in Syria is facing a deadlock," he told Agence France Presse.
The effects have been far-reaching for Lebanon's political scene, traditionally fractious but now increasingly dysfunctional.
The government effectively collapsed nine months ago, with the resignation of Prime Minister Najib Miqati, and lengthy negotiations on the formation of a consensus replacement have gone nowhere.
Parliamentary elections have been postponed, and there are doubts about whether a presidential vote scheduled for May will go ahead.
At the root of the tensions lies a deep division between Hizbullah and the March 14 camp.
The split has only widened with Hizbullah's decision to fight alongside Syria's President Bashar Assad against an uprising that is supported by many Lebanese Sunnis.
"There is a deep underlying split (that is) obvious in this country," said Karim Makdisi, a professor of political studies at AUB.
"It comes in phases. The underlying issue remains, and then when there's a particular regional issue, this stuff comes back up to the surface."
Since the war in Syria began, Hizbullah has seen its southern Beirut stronghold targeted in three bomb attacks, along with a double suicide bombing that hit the Iranian embassy in Beirut.
The attacks illustrate a growing trend of Sunni radicalization in Lebanon fueled by the Syrian conflict and heightened sectarian rhetoric, said Sahar Atrash, an analyst at the International Crisis Group.
"The traditional leaders of the Islamists... are losing in favor of those who are more radical," she said.
"In the view of many they proved not to be strong enough to act against Hizbullah," she said, with the conflict in Syria adding a "new layer to the whole Sunni-Shiite divide."
Lebanon fought a civil war between 1975 and 1990 and its delicate sectarian balance is reflected in a complex political arrangement that has regularly generated political crises.
In March, PM Miqati resigned, effectively bringing down the government, but ongoing disagreements between Hizbullah and the March 14 movement have prevented even the formation of an interim replacement government.
Later this year, President Michel Suleiman's term expires and parliament should be called upon to elect a replacement for the office.
The candidate is usually chosen by consensus, which will be hard to come by in such a polarized environment.
"I don't see the two parties sitting at the table, agreeing on a government or a president," said Atrash.
"The gap is so deep and the issues at stake for both parties are so important, so existential in a way, that none of them would be willing to make a compromise."
Makdisi described all Lebanon's key political players as demonstrating "incredible irresponsibility."
"I don't think there's any strategy and I think that all sides are just playing a game of chicken," he said.
But he also pointed to the regional influence at work in Lebanon, where Saudi Arabia holds sway over much of the Sunni community, while its arch-enemy Iran arms, funds and trains Hizbullah.
The only solution for Lebanon is if "the Saudis say okay we're going to move towards some kind of agreement, they get together with the Iranians and they strike some kind of deal."
In the meantime, Lebanon's stalemate appears as intractable as Syria's war.
"I think the country will be on hold until after an agreement is reached on Syria." Khashan said.
(1). What our respected analysts are saying are facts known now by all. First, one look at the divisive situation that chronically plagues this forum will confirm the dynamics on the ground, Lebanese ground. Sadly, most Lebanese still give priority to the foreigner instead of Lebanon, even more sadly most Lebanese remain sectarian instead of Lebanese. The battle that rages since 2005 is a merciless one, one in which no quarters are given for free, up to the point where one side or for that matter the other, is willing to sacrifice the entire country to see the demise of the other, and vice versa. Our political system and everything that makes up this country is dishonest, and because of that, the world too will be dishonest to us. Because we lie to each other, the world too will lie to us.
(2). Here we are, at the beginning of the Arab Spring, (now a lasting Winter chill), but more particularly the Syrian conflict, we could have turned a losing situation into a win-win one, if only we saw beyond our noses, we could have hence turned Lebanon into a safe paradise for tourism, industrial, services and fiscal entities. Alas, we shall never see what's good for us, never. In 1975, we entered into what was one of the most bitter of civil wars ever, but just across the med, the Island State of Cyprus took advantage of our catastrophe and capitalized on our utter idiocies and misfortunes. Now in 2014, the Gulf is praying all it can to keep Lebanon the sleeping giant to remain in sleep for as long as possible. So Faraya will see snow, but most will go to Dubai's artificial slopes, it's safer, and there, they think at least.
unfortunately I have to agree to the content of your comment. and I say unfortunately because in general it is correct.
same goes for the roar. your comment is correct.
many people in Lebanon would talk about a secular Lebanon, but if you scratch their surface they run towards their sect immediately.
as long as we are divided bisects in Lebanon and our 'religious men' have a say in our civil lives, Lebanon is doomed. whatever solutions they come up with are useless.
each period one sect feels they are higher in number than the others and they try to change their quota in parliament. one question: how does it benefit Mr. anylebanese?
the big thing you are talking about can be a dictator but coupled with economic prosperity so the people have something else to do than think about politics.
The trouble is that Lebanon is ridiculously sectarian.
How can a government post be allocated based on religion instead of merit? It's the same as picking someone for a job because of his music preference!
Elsewhere it's a violation of equal opportunity and is illegal.
Military rule for a few years, that's what it needs. Not opperssive dictatorship, but true military. Where one law is for everyone and there's no politics, only discipline.
Yes yes yes, Saturn iza Allah bi7ebna, we will have military rule, at least for 5 years or ten, afdal ya akhi, because democracy for us Lebanese is a term used to cheat.
Wow.. The first time I hear the_roar making some sense... Impressive... After all, my bro the_roar has a brain, and I don't mean it in a bad way.. I agree with you the_roar. What you said about Lebanon and the people is so true!!
Are you living outside Lebanon?
the_roar ... 3rd generation and you are still involved... Very interesting because you don't see this so often... So I will take it you were not born in Lebanon??? If that is the case, why you have so much resentment for the Lebanese Forces and Geagea but yet you adore your general... Were you there at all during the Lebanese civil war??