ISIL Claims Responsibility for Haret Hreik Bombing

Hezbollah and Iran pioneered sucide bombings. Remember the barracks in 1983. Mohammad Hossein Fahmideh was a 13 year old Iranian suicide bomber who was hailed as a national hero by Khomeini himself in the 1980s.

Sad, that the only thing they are good at, is suicide bombings.

The irony is that Hezbollah began as a suicide bombing terrorist organization.

Difference is, to target American Marines, and to target civilians as your heroes do yazid. So what is the irony there?

"In the early 1980s, Hezbollah popularized suicide bombings as an effective terrorist tactic. In April 1983, Hezbollah allegedly blew up a van filled with explosives in front of the U.S. embassy in Beirut killing 58 Americans and Lebanese. Then in October 1983, Hezbollah is believed to be responsible for a truck bomb that detonated in the U.S. Marine barracks killing 241 American peacekeepers, and a simultaneous truck bombing at the French barracks that killed 58 French soldiers. These attacks contributed to the decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon the following year. Hezbollah also carried out a number of kidnappings of Westerners in Lebanon during the mid 1980s, in which they executed the hostages or traded them for money or weapons.
"

Hezbollah, a world renowned terrorist organization famous for suicide bombings.

You should follow in the footsteps of Ibrahim Hussein Berro.

"In addition to Lebanon, Hezbollah's security apparatus operates in Europe, North and South America, East Asia, and other parts of the Middle East, and it is believed to be responsible for a number of other high profile terrorist attacks. In 1985 Hezbollah members hijacked TWA flight 847 and held the 39 Americans on board hostage for weeks. In addition, the 1992 bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Argentina and the 1994 bombing of a Jewish cultural centre in Buenos Aires are attributed to Hezbollah. Furthermore, in June 1996, Hezbollah allegedly attacked the Khobar Towers housing complex in Dharan, Saudi Arabia, killing 19 U.S servicemen and wounding hundreds of others.
"

True the hijack of the TWA flight 847 happend, but no civilians were killed, only one US. Navy seal marine died, so what is your point ya yazid?

Btw, Hezbollah was not created back then.

The attack on the Jewish Center in Argentina resulted in civilian deaths.

There were no proofs that it was Hezbollah behind it, just as what happend in Bulgaria, leaks indicates they were comitted by Al Qaeda affiliated groups.

Who did the 9/11 again hmm? Your beloved so called "Sheikh Osama" that worked for CIA against the soviets back in the day. Very smart yazid

The Bulgarian and Argentine governments can confirm the attacks were conducted by Hezbollah agents. As usual, it's hezbollah's zionist conspiracies against the world and reality.

Now that makes no sense yazid, first of all why would the zionist want Israeli civilians to die? And why would Hezbollah destroy their image by targeting Civilians? That is not true, and wont happen. There is a difference between accusing and having the proofs behind it. Ofcourse they blamed Hezbollah, they also blamed Hezbollah in 9/11 before they knew who it really were.

The investigations link to Iran and Hezbollah in both cases, and only to them, not so with 9/11, furthermore Al-Qaeda is generally open about their attacks, why wouldn't they be here?

Because i believe CIA and Al Qaeda are working together, just like Osama worked with them prior to 9/11 and just as they did with the influx of fighters from Turkey into Syria. It all makes perfectly good sense.

Shia Iran worked with the zionists in Afghanistan and Iraq. They are co-conspirators with the zionists, if there is any conspiracy. For the bombings, all evidence points to hezbollah and iran in those cases. What does Bulgaria have to do with the CIA or the Mossad?

What zionists are you talking about? Iran didn't work with anyone, The west already had sanctions on them back then. All your Qaeda theories don't give any points or facts Yazid, maybe they do in Saudi Arabia, but not here.

Iran offered to sell out Hezbollah in exchange for direct assistance in Iraq. That is a fact, and the zionists overthrew Saddam and replaced him with an iranian puppet shia regime, and the shias worked with the us occupational govenrment against the Sunnis. In Afghanistan, both the US and Iran worked with the northern alliance against the Taliban.

What facts are those? Something you believe yourself, good for you. Now there is a difference between, wishes and facts Yazid.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6274147.stm

Also, see the book "Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States"

An Iranian agent living in the US, Trita Parsi admits to the historical background dealings between Iran and the US 'evil zionist empire'.

Mystic - "leaks indicates they were comitted by Al Qaeda affiliated groups" do you specialize in lying?

"Since that time, Lebanese guerrilla group Hezbollah inflicted significant military losses on the major US ally in the region, Israel, in the 2006 conflict and is now claiming increased political power in Lebanon."

Wasn't it you who just said Hezbollah and Israel were working together? The quote above is from your very link.

Iran doesn't control Hezbollah, they support them nothing else. No matter how much the BBC or American wants it.

They are in Syria, to protect Lebanese & Syrians against the takfiri threat, and because Syria is a long time ally of the Resistance, they helped us against Israel.

There would be no hezbollah without the syrian connection and Iran. Hezbollah is a pet dog that depends on the leash linked to Syria.

Whatever you wanna believe yazid. Just don't forget who are loosing in Syria now.

Don't forget Shia Iran's failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. All the shias in syria need to do is lose once...

That is indeed, what the takfiris and western leaders, said would happen 3 years ago. You said every month that it was only a matter of time, but it never happend. Now it is your takfiri days that are being counted Yazid.

The days of the shia regime are already numbered. In Afghanistan, a complete failure for the west and their shia zionist buddies, the Taliban are set to regain complete control, and in Iraq, the shias still don't even have control over a significant part of iraq despite US zionist assistance. It's the secular FSA who are losing, which in the long-run, is good for the islamists.

FSA are Al Qaeda controlled aswell. What is all this paranoid delusions about shia hegemony? Saud really makes you takfiris paranoid with all this nonsense, Syria was a peaceful country and their people lived in harmony until, the takfiris started calling out for "freedom". Now is this the freedom you want? Death and destruction.

No, the FSA are secularists like the Egyptian Army, that's why the US supports them, and that's why the US hasn't said anything about the coup in Egypt. The Islamists are against the FSA. The Shias wanted to oust Saddam, but Saddam was a real Arab Baathist Nationalist, unlike assad who caters to the Iranians, so at least Saddam Baathists were intellectually consistent. And there was never any real peace in any baathist regime, ask ethnic minorities like the kurds.

So how come, if this is an all out Shia sunni war, as you claim, and which i deny. Then how come the Egyptian army are crushing the Muslim brotherhood? They are both sunnis and it still happens? That is indeed because nobody wants to live under takfiri rules yazid, normal sunnis rejects them aswell. That is why you will loose, Syrians are fighting for the country they once were, you are fighting to destroy everyones lives, and insert your fake caliphate, that wont include any minorities or normal sunnis just the Salafi and takfiris will remain, in your dreams that is.

So how come, if this is an all out Shia sunni war, as you claim, and which i deny. Then how come the Egyptian army are crushing the Muslim brotherhood? They are both sunnis and it still happens? That is indeed because nobody wants to live under takfiri rules yazid, normal sunnis rejects them aswell. That is why you will loose, Syrians are fighting for the country they once were, you are fighting to destroy everyones lives, and insert your fake caliphate, that wont include any minorities or normal sunnis just the Salafi and takfiris will remain, in your dreams that is.

All these dictatorships were traditionally sustained by western support one way or another, and now the west is on the decline. The majority of Egyptians voted for the MB and then the Salafis, they wanted a sunni islamist system, just like in Iran, the majority of Iranians vote for the shia islamist regime. You can't have it both ways. The Egyptian military enforced zionist mubarak's rule and acts as agents for the US. So, what you're saying is that most egyptians are zionists going by your zionist conspiracy theories. LOL
How come the Saudis are backing the Egyptian military if they are supporting the islamists? Because the Saudis want dictatorships, they are opposed to the islamists. There are wealthy saudi individuals who support islamists, but those same islamists want to overthrow all the corrupt regimes including saudi arabia's. Unlike shias who try to make a black and white picture and say that they support Saudi Arabia.

Nobody is denying that Saudi arabia worked with USA, but my point is, that Saudi also backed US against Saddam. Just like both of them backed him, when he was fighting Iran, but Saudi wanted to protect their little brother Kuwait, so they had to support US against Saddam. Now about Egypt, Muslim brotherhood is supported by Qatar, and the Egyptian army, by US saudi etc.

Saudi and Qatar are fighting a war in Egypt.

I do believe the Egyptian army will cut their ties with Saudi & USA and be closer to Russia now.

All the Gulf countries supported the coup, except for Qatar, but that doesn't mean that Qatar ever wanted a caliphate, which is what the islamists would want. If push eventually came to shove, Qatar might have switched sides, but the specific modern MB agenda in Egypt did not openly advocate a caliphate.

Also, you had the shias in Bahrain whining about freedom until they
were put down like dogs. Saddam and the Saudis had issues over Kuwait, however, they both had the same view towards the Iranians and it was Iran that desperately wanted Saddam to be overthrown in order to dominate Iraq to the extent that they were willing to sell-out Hezbollah.

The Egyptian military is funded and was historically funded under mubarak by the US government. They would be broke and non-existent without foreign support propping up the regime.

As for Russia, LOL, Russia is not going to give them a dime (they couldn't even afford it), and Russia also has issues with Iran. Even in Syria, Russia is only using Assad for oil drilling rights. The Russians originally brainwashed the azeris into pan-turkism so that they are now allies of the sunni turks, against shia iran.

You mean the Al Qaeda, who killed all the which caused them to mass exodus from Iraq. Just like AL Qaeda is destroying the christians in Syria now,

http://en.alalam.ir/news/1541207

Syria before the war, and i know you will probaly say it is propaganda, because it is from an Iranian site, so here Western news aswell

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/11/al-qaeda-linked-syrian-rebels-force-christian-conv/?page=all

Here Al Qaeda beheaded a priest, which contradict the bs you said.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100224075/syrian-rebels-behead-a-catholic-priest-before-a-cheering-crowd-wheres-the-msm-reaction/

This is the same western media, that you send me before. So don't call it propaganda, this is just to show you, that you are lying.
By the way, Moqtada al Sadr is backing the Al Qaeda against Maliki aswell.

Apparently, you're double spamming posts now, here's my response from the other thread:

al Sadr has a political dispute with al-maliki over term limits, but he wants a shia iranian backed terror state to remain in place nonetheless.

Yes, in Iraq, it's both sunni and shia extremists who are killing christians, so there's effectively no difference. We know how shia operate when they are in the majority.

Apparently you are waitng for my every comment, so i had to make sure you read it. Now this is a waste of time. Christians knows that it is the Al Qaeda whom are killing them, christians in Syria seek protection from the government, and they know who the ones are, that is destroying their churches, forcing them to Islam, and beheading their children.

Al Qaeda rebels AKA FSA destroying the beloved virgin mary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9cQjAwjWMo

You re mentally ill ya resistance. Seriously. The guy said Iranians don't care about Arabs killing eachother. Was it the name that provoked you? Get over it.

We can't really have dialogue with each other Yazid, we are both enemies, and that it will continue on that path, until either one of us is finished. I Back the Resistance, you back Al Qaeda, it is ok. So what are we talking about? Our conversations wont gain anything. Just a waste of time.

LOL, you want to play politicking and popularity contests, but christians are also suffering from shia terror in iraq, shia terrorists are no different. This proves that shias are simply pure opportunists.

"Shia Terrorists have already shown their true colors in iraq with their death squards in which sunnis and assyrian christians are targeted and killed.

You see here the mahdi army killing an assyrian girl for being christian.

http://www.aina.org/news/20050324155721.htm

And a Shiite Iraqi Ayatollah has issued a fatwa to convert to Islam or die for iraqi christians:

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Shiite-ayatollah-launches-fatwa:-Iraqi-Christians,-conversion-to-Islam-or-death-26636.html"

Who are the Hezbalshaytan targeting now mystic? Doesn't seem like they re targeting an advanced war machine. Villagers who've risen up against their arms supplier!?!?

Just remember what happened to Husayn and continue to follow in his footsteps, that is all.....

Let the Christians decide for themselves, who their real enemies are. I do know one thing, it is not the sunni or the shia, it is the Takfiri Al Qaeda who are their enemies.

http://www.catholic.org/internationa
/international_story.php?id=53030

http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/11/26/report-islamis-slaughter-of-syrian-christians-ignored-by-obama-liberal-media/

http://au.christiantoday.com/article/islamists-besiege-two-christian-villages-in-syria-13-people-killed/16394.htm

Just like i know, it is not the sunni that is my enemy, just the takfiris. And you are a takfiri.

Sure, let the christians see how the shias act in iraq where they are in the majority towards christians and sunnis, they don't act any different, and christians are killed by shia terrorists as we have seen.

I look forward to the day, Lebanon has been purged by you takfiris, you are shooting yourself in the foot everytime. Just like in Syria, you are loosing we both know that, so now you are crying and whining, even glorifying the terrorist act, seen on this very post. Keep it going ya wahabi

Continue to cry and whine about Iraq and Afghanistan, where the Taliban is crushing the shia-zionist coalition, and in Iraq, where shias still don't have effective control over the state despite assistance from the us zionists. LOL, shias don't have any options regarding losing, there will always be more and more sunnis, since sunnis are the majority, on the other hand, shias only need to lose once, this is while iran is facing a massive economic crisis. Shias /Iran can't even AFFORD to continue at the rate they're going, curious, isn't it?

مئة عام من سايكس بيكو وستون عاما من حكم العسكر والاقليات الدموي في كل بلاد العرب والمسلمين. جرائم الابادة الجماعية التي يرتكبها الحكم العسكري العلوي ضد الشعب السوري هي جرائم لا تغتفر تضاف الى جرائم الاستعمار واذنابه ضد امتنا في الجزائر والعراق وافغانستان ومصر وفلسطين والصومال. ان نهاية المجوس والروافض ستكون نهاية دموية.

Yeah, are you the one fighting them? What happens when the army confronts them crossing the border - I wouldn't want my relatives who are in the army to have to clean up HAs mess.

ISIL is Al Qaeda

@Phoenix, i still believe it is the Takfiris who killed Mohammed Shatah, in order to create secterian war in Lebanon. I believe they did both bombings.

Lebanon gets out of this trouble, if the army starts clearing out Takfiris. That would be the end to the terror.

No Arab Natinalist/Baathist regime was ever peaceful, you can ask ethnic minorities like the kurds, but at least Saddam's regime was intellectually consistent, and he was opposed by the shia terrorists. Unlike Assad, who servers the iranians. Shia Terrorists have already shown their true colors in iraq with their death squards in which sunnis and assyrian christians are targeted and killed.

You see here the mahdi army killing an assyrian girl for being christian.

http://www.aina.org/news/20050324155721.htm

And a Shiite Iraqi Ayatollah has issued a fatwa to convert to Islam or die for iraqi christians:

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Shiite-ayatollah-launches-fatwa:-Iraqi-Christians,-conversion-to-Islam-or-death-26636.html

You mean the Al Qaeda, who killed all the which caused them to mass exodus from Iraq. Just like AL Qaeda is destroying the christians in Syria now,

http://en.alalam.ir/news/1541207

Syria before the war, and i know you will probaly say it is propaganda, because it is from an Iranian site, so here Western news aswell

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/11/al-qaeda-linked-syrian-rebels-force-christian-conv/?page=all

Here Al Qaeda beheaded a priest, which contradict the bs you said.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100224075/syrian-rebels-behead-a-catholic-priest-before-a-cheering-crowd-wheres-the-msm-reaction/

This is the same western media, that you send me before. So don't call it propaganda, this is just to show you, that you are lying.
By the way, Moqtada al Sadr is backing the Al Qaeda against Maliki aswell.

Yazid, you are mixing everything together. And your topics are clearly off this post. You should stick to one subject

al Sadr has a political dispute with al-maliki over term limits, but he wants a shia iranian backed terror state to remain in place nonetheless.

Yes, in Iraq, it's both sunni and shia extremists who are killing christians, so there's effectively no difference. We know how shia operate when they are in the majority.

I'm fully on the subject, you want to ignore shia terrorism, and then cherry-pick sunnis attacks, but, guess what, at the end of the day, shias are little different, as we see in Iraq.

Again, as i said before. Sunni & Shia don't kill christians. Al Qaeda do.

Iraqi Shias fully backed by the shia Iranian government have been killing christians and sunnis in accordance with their shia beliefs.

Or are you calling your shia ayatollahs munafiqs, thus making you a takfiri?

That makes no sense. So the majority of the se takfiris who are Syrian are all in a fuss because they had it so great and just didn't realize what you realize? You re an absolute moron mystic.

Even if the takfiris are stateless actors, the Syrian people have allowed them to fight against their oppressor, why? Because one is worse than the other. Bashar and his haiwan in HA are worse.

If you look at the history of war, the side who goes to war without allies suffers. It takes pain and patience to build consensus but that's what is needed to win, as well as the belief that what they re doing is right.

HA has none of the above.