Ministerial Committee Meets on Policy Statement, Salam Proposes 'Non-Contentious' Draft
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةThe ministerial committee tasked with devising a government policy statement met on Wednesday afternoon at the Grand Serail amid reports that Prime Minister Tammam Salam will present it with a draft statement.
"The committee convened in the Grand Serail and the meeting was presided over by Salam,” the state-run National News Agency reported.
"The seven members of the committee were all present in the meeting,” the NNA noted.
The committee is composed of State Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Mohammed Fneish, Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil, Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil, Telecommunications Minister Butros Harb, Health Minister Wael Abou Faour, Labor Minister Sejaan Qazzi, and Interior Minister Nuhad al-Mashnouq.
LBCI television revealed that Salam prepared a draft policy statement that he will distribute to the ministerial committee during the meeting.
Sources close to Salam told LBCI that there are priorities on which the ministerial statement will be based.
"These priorities include security matters, the issue of refugees and the presidential elections."
“A ministerial policy statement proposal was discussed with a positive attitude meeting,” LBCI quoted Health Minister Wael Abou Faour as saying.
Radio Voice of Lebanon (100.5)a also said a positive atmosphere prevailed in the first meeting of the ministerial committee.
"The brief statement proposal does not include any controversial articles,” LBCI remarked.
Later in the evening, the same source noted that the army-people-resistance equation has not been tackled yet in the meeting.
However, Hizbullah sources told the the television channel that the party will not accept to abandon the army-people-resistance equation in the ministerial policy statement.
Telecom Minister Butros Harb announced from the Grand Serail that a decision has been made to speed up an agreement on a policy statement and to come up with one that “does not deceive the people.”
“There will be no issues of contention in the ministerial statement and we will agree to a consensual one,” Mashnouq told LBCI.
Meanwhile, ministerial sources told MTV that studying the draft requires three or four meetings before voting on it at the cabinet.
Earlier in the day, An Nahar daily reported that the ministerial committee will avoid discussions on controversial issues and instead focus on the principles of the Constitution and the resumption of the national dialogue to resolve the differences between the rival parties,.
An Nahar quoted al-Mashnouq as saying that the members of the committee would be able to agree on a blueprint acceptable by all political parties.
“We should be able to agree on a plan that backs the role of the state and stresses that only the state would be responsible for the Lebanese in political, military, economic and security issues,” he said.
As Safir newspaper also said that Salam will propose to the committee a “blueprint that satisfies everyone.”
It quoted several unidentified ministers as saying that the policy statement would focus on “the Lebanese government's commitment to all the principles that were consolidated by the Lebanese cabinets since the Taef Accord.”
Such wordings would avoid a controversy on the “people-army-resistance” equation which Hizbullah was holding onto before the formation of the cabinet.
They would also appease the March 14 alliance that was sticking to its call for the adoption of the Baabda Declaration as the basis of the policy statement.
Hizbullah's al-Manar TV confirmed that neither the “people-army-resistance” equation nor the Baabda Declaration would be mentioned in the blueprint, a sign that both the March 8 and March 14 camps have agreed to steer themselves clear of a dispute inside the committee.
The new government's main task will be the preparation for the presidential elections. It was formed on Saturday after a ten-month deadlock and has only a few months of authority before the polls to choose a new president by the time Michel Suleiman's term expires in May.
"the state would be responsible for the Lebanese in political, military, economic and security issues”… that is an excellent policy statement, they should all agree on that and hold to it.
Now we finally have a government, but also, now is not the time to procrastinate or foot-dragging. The country is in a terrible state, chaos is just round the corner, today two cowardly blasts occurred in Al Dahieh again making new victims, our telecoms system is now well below par, as is almost every service sector of the land. The economy is in absolute tatters and shambles, we have now over a million Syrian refugees, and over 600,000 untrustworthy Palestinians, we have militias forming and following in the footpath of other militias, and a simple statement is taking so long to make public. I wish we were like the Ukrainians, not that I condone any act of violence, absolutely NOT, but at least we the people will no longer be taken for such silly and utterly stupid rides by our utterly reckless and irresponsible politicians.
'600,000 untrustworthy Palestinians'
funny how all christian and shia palestinians got citizenship but sunnis cant even buy property or access proper job. They must have a gene that makes them 'untrustworthy'.
The more I read phoenix the less I believe he's christian.
But then, I have to admit that it's a stupid cliché to believe that all christians are educated, civilized and open-minded...
cedre
shia and christian pals did not get citizenship except maybe a few exceptions.
sunnis sided with pals in the civil war and tried to kick christians out of lebanon. They failed. Now with mustakbal, sunnis came around and became partners to the christians.
As a sunnite, your ennemy is assad. As chiites, the enemy is israel. You have to understand that as christian, our ennemy is the pals.
To live together as partners, we have to stop talking exclusively of israel as the enemy. We have to say it clearly that assad and pals are also enemies of lebanon.
haret hreik.
You have to understand that we, as lebanese got nothing good out of these pals.
They started our civil war, tried to kick christians out of lebanon, invited israel, and now are doing terrorism.
Compare this to the armenians, say.
They open businesses, hire people, activate the economy...
I agree with you, Phoenix views about society is a bit backwards, especially if he is homophobic as you say. However in this case he is 100% right. pals are the worst catastrophe that befell lebanon.
Phoenix.... If you want I am with you in terms of doing a Ukraine style civil disobedience but the problem is no one will follow unless they get orders from the political camp they support, there wont be a single voice and a single agenda if you know what I mean... but get 100 000 people to go with us and I think it could be the start of something....
You're right George, which is why I lament my writing in such wishful thinking. As the saying goes, "If I could, I would move mountains". here in Lebanon, if we could, not only would we move mountains, but more so the mountains of political trash that litter our lives. It's truly sad to note, that our politicians have very early on taken the lead when we took independence 70 years ago. They give us the impression that they are divided and opposed to each other, but trust me when it comes to sharing the kitty, they'll remind us that they are best friends between themselves. For this, they'll never leave us any room to defy them.
The committee would be wise to hold firm to the constitution in drafting the policy statement. The equation since 2005 of “people-army-resistance” is no where to be found in the constitution.
Including in the official policy statement of the Government a provision that condones the existence of a "resistance" which is nowhere authorized in the constitution, is extraordinary, to say the least.
While it is true that the Taif Accord exempted Hezbollah from the requirement that all militia disarm, that was agreed to in 1989 when the country was occupied. The occupation is now more than 14 years in the past. No need for "resistance" any longer.