Change and Reform Rejects 'Collaborators' Label for Lebanese in Israel, Says Vacuum Doesn't Forbid Passing Electoral Law

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The Change and Reform parliamentary bloc on Tuesday stressed the need to approve a new electoral law while maintaining efforts to elect a president, rejecting the “collaborators” label for the Lebanese who had fled to Israel in 2000.

“All parliamentary blocs had promised to prepare an electoral law so that we don't resort to another extension but nothing has happened until the moment,” MP Ibrahim Kanaan told reporters after the bloc's weekly meeting.

“We're witnessing a presidential vacuum because there is a defect in the constitution, but what prevents us from working on an electoral law for the parliamentary elections?” Kanaan wondered, warning that “we risk resorting to another extension or deepening the defect of representation in terms of the needed equal power-sharing between Christians and Muslims.”

“This reform is needed at the presidential and parliamentary levels and the electoral law is one of the extraordinary laws that the parliament is allowed to approve during the period of presidential vacuum,” Kanaan noted.

He added: “Are we supposed to maintain the defect indefinitely? Why don't we implement real partnership in the political system? There are laws that were referred to parliament and do not require a meeting of the joint committees.”

On Sunday, Change and Reform bloc MP Alain Aoun said the country should head to parliamentary polls in order to prevent a protracted presidential vacuum.

Turning to the issued of the exiled Lebanese in Israel, Kanaan said "a draft law proposed by General (Michel) Aoun had refrained from calling them collaborators, and we considered them Lebanese citizens who had sought refuge in Israel."

He urged an end to the current controversy because "the issue was resolved at the legislative level,” adding that “the memorandum of understanding (with Hizbullah) and the 2011 legislation are well-known” by all parties.

Hizbullah, which spearheaded military resistance against Israel's occupation of south Lebanon, has stressed that only the state can acquit or condemn those who fled to Israel while emphasizing that “we do not want collaborators in Lebanon.”

The party's remarks came in response to a statement on Friday by Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi from the Israeli village of Isfia near Haifa, during which he rejected that the Lebanese in Israel be considered “traitors and criminals” and called for their return to Lebanon without an amnesty law.

“We will press on with the bill that was approved in 2011 regarding those who fled to Israel and we will follow up on the approval of the needed decrees. Overbidding is not appropriate and the criticism against us is unjustified,” Kanaan said.

Separately, the MP said the issue of the stalled new wage scale requires "an extraordinary legislation that would provide stability at the political level."

"We have given a chance for consensus over this issue but this does not mean forsaking the plan," he added.

"The issue of the new wage scale will not be at the expense of the treasury and we hope the file will be finalized," Kanaan went on to say.

Y.R.

Comments 27
Missing greatpierro 03 June 2014, 18:36

Bravo for the courage of fpm against the hegemony of khizbollah

Thumb jabal10452 03 June 2014, 18:42

Mniha mennak Brahim!

Thumb amatoury114 03 June 2014, 21:42

yes yes mni7a minnak brahimmm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bysatipZAlI

shei 7elou shei mratteib...khaweija hal brahim!!

Thumb popeye 03 June 2014, 18:46

Kanaan: We're witnessing a presidential vacuum because there is a defect in the constitution.

for heavens sake, can someone point him to where the defect allegedly is? The constitution says go to parliament and vote for a president !! Simple as that... where is the defect that he sees? Change and Reform...Alas!

Thumb ice-man 03 June 2014, 19:01

@jabal: why are you attacking popeye today? btw, You still making a living at managing companies between phone calls?

Thumb popeye 03 June 2014, 19:08

hi ice-man! coz aounis like this @jabal don't really care about the vacuum in the presidency. He once recommended Kanaan for foreign minister, and it was between phone calls yes!

Thumb ex-fpm 03 June 2014, 19:13

why give him credit for something that is a given. Focus on the more pressing issues, jabal. The presidency seat is much more important for lebanon and the christians at this stage.

Thumb ado.australia 04 June 2014, 06:48

Popeye

the defect is that the president hasn't enough powers and the pm and speaker roles during vacuums are are not clearly defined. The taef accord was written on the back of cheque books and there will be constant dead lock because this was the purpose.

Small change is allowing parliament quorum achieved to sit with 66 mps instead of 2/3rds.
Giving the president to power to sack an ineffective cabinet and call early elections.
Electoral law being the responsibility of the "senate" and not needing parliament to approve.

Those 3 changes will stop almost all political deadlock.

Thumb liberty 04 June 2014, 07:27

Why divert the discussion. MPs should go to parliament and vote for a president. Sure the constitution like any other is not perfect. The FPM is obstructing the elections of a Christian president by not going to vote and this has nothing to do with some perceived defects in the constitution.

Thumb lebanon_first 04 June 2014, 07:27

Jabal agree 100%.

Thumb ice-man 03 June 2014, 19:02

What's with the story of the banker and the umbrella? remind us please:)

Thumb popeye 03 June 2014, 19:05

lol @the_roar, and you have seen a lot:)

Thumb ex-fpm 03 June 2014, 19:15

it is amazing how this forum gets disrupted once you start posting your nonsense on a daily basis, the_roar!

Thumb liberty 04 June 2014, 07:28

roar, every time you post somebody 'owns' you. you are a sorry excuse for a human being.

Thumb ice-man 03 June 2014, 19:20

are asylum seekers allowed to vote in the syrian elections?

Thumb EagleDawn 03 June 2014, 19:27

roar, how many posts do we expect to see from you tonite.... is it an all 'nighter' once again...?:) Post something of substance once in your miserable life.

Thumb EagleDawn 03 June 2014, 19:37

roar, i know all:)

Thumb lebanon_first 03 June 2014, 21:01

Good point Ibrahim. This shows that FPM is not blindly following HA and that it can stand by its stances when it deems fit.

HA are collaborators with Iran who invaded Beirut in 2008 and are therefore more criminal than those who fled to israel. Let this be known.

Thumb lebanon_first 03 June 2014, 22:22

Roar-southern. This does not concern me since I am living in christian Beirut. And it does not concern you since you were abroad. But all my Sunni friends living in west Beirut feel that ever since HA and amal invaded beirut on the 7 may 2008 they are living under shia rule.
Roar. The coup of HA then was not self defense. It was HA putting a red line for siniora against changing the security chief of the airport. 56 people were killed.
Southern. You have such an idealist vision of HA because you think they kicked Israel out that you are not rational when it comes to them

Thumb cedre 04 June 2014, 00:22

leb first is totally right, it was an invasion.
But he's wrong if he thinks it only concerns sunnis.
HizbIran didnt only invade sunni areas, they did a coup, showing they're now controlling Lebanon. They invaded chouf, they threatened Geagea and other christian leaders to stay quiet...

They told LAF to stay apart or they'll have all shias to desert with weaponry. Michel Sleiman got scared of another civil war and did nothing...

Thumb liberty 04 June 2014, 06:27

It should concern you lebanon_first and very much. This is not just a sunni concern. HA can come to your area and do the same anytime they want. The logic of outlaws is "but, you are my friend and I won't hurt you, I will hurt him" is not something we should accept. Sooner or later these outlaws will turn on you when they see fit.

Thumb lebanon_first 04 June 2014, 07:22

I meant it does not concern Christians as much as Sunnis since Christians had been marginalized before since Taaef, so they were screwed anyway and the invasion of west Beirut is not such a big deal to them as to the Sunnites who were controlling the country.

Thumb lebanon_first 04 June 2014, 07:26

Liberty. Extremist Sunnites came to our areas during the danish cartoons episode. They burned and killed also. HA could come anytime. But it didn't yet.

Thumb popeye 04 June 2014, 13:14

The extremists you refer to came to "your" area to express a political point of view which turned out to be ugly. They did not come to invade and conquer like the terror party in its invasion of Beirut. Had the Danish embassy been in another location, the outcome would have been the same.

Missing mansour 03 June 2014, 23:23

Approve the law for expats to vote and we will show you who the minority are..
Let the war between shia and sunni begin and may it last till the end of time.

Long Live The Syrian Civil War!

Thumb gma-bs-artist. 04 June 2014, 06:35

It's starting to dawn on the FPM that the MOU their leader signed without consulting most of them in the Mar Mikhael Church with Hassan is nothing but a worthless rag. Hassan did not only disrespected his own signature he disrespected the holy venue where the document was signed and the senile fool he signed it with. Hassan got everything he needed from Aoun ie Christian cover for his activities inside and outside the country and in return he gave Aoun nothing of any value except the incremental loss of support withing his own community. Now even Aoun and his close circle have realized this and are now desperately trying to mend the bridges he blew up between himself and Hariri. Stranger still official from HA are constantly threatening anyone who dares touch the MOU with all kinds of calamities when they themselves have broken every clause in it.

Missing coolmec 04 June 2014, 07:51

Pity the nation
Idiots are running the country and taking it further to the abyss
Haram