Hizbullah and Mustaqbal Call for Creating 'Appropriate Atmosphere for Work of Institutions'

W460

Hizbullah and al-Mustaqbal movement agreed Monday that the country's political forces must try and create an “appropriate atmosphere” for the proper functioning of state institutions.

“The conferees discussed the current developments and situations in the country,” said a joint statement issued by the two parties after their 13th dialogue session in Ain al-Tineh.

“They stressed the need to continue dialogue, follow up on the implementation of the security plans and create the appropriate atmosphere for the work of constitutional institutions,” the terse statement added.

The two parties appear determined to continue their dialogue sessions although a war of words has recently flared between them over Syria, Yemen and the presidential crisis.

They have declared that the talks' main objective is defusing Sunni-Shiite sectarian tensions.

Speaker Nabih Berri, who is sponsoring the dialogue at his Ain al-Tineh residence, has reassured that the verbal feud between the rival parties would not have an impact on their talks.

In remarks to several local dailies published on Monday, the speaker revealed that the round of dialogue would focus on the paralysis of the executive and legislative branches.

“It is true that the talks did not make major achievements in the past two sessions, but they are necessary to protect the security situation,” he told the newspapers.

Lebanon has been witnessing a vacuum at Baabda Palace since the term of president Michel Suleiman ended in May last year. The presidential deadlock has caused a paralysis at the parliament, which is not able to convene over lack of quorum to elect a head of state or legislate, and a cabinet paralysis.

The talks between al-Mustaqbal and Hizbullah had kicked off in December.

Y.R.

Comments 3
Missing humble 15 June 2015, 22:42

They sit, they talk, they express 99% opposite views and claim it is a dialogue (new definition in dictionnary)!

Missing alyanko10452 16 June 2015, 04:31

It's a charade. Who are they kidding. Why give Hezbollah that much importance.

Thumb -phoenix1 16 June 2015, 15:46

Gabby, this scenario is not far-fetched either, when a force or a regime begins to lose a war, the disenchanted amongst their ranks will always try to end the war by assassinating the conflict maker. This was one such case during WW2 when some of Hitler's top officer's tried to kill him and hope to end the war they were already losing.