Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon Insulted by Trump's 'Shameful' Deal

W460

"Insulting." "Shameful." "A disgrace." Those were some of the words used by Palestinian refugees in Lebanon on Wednesday to describe a White House plan for ending the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

At refugee camps across the country, Palestinians staged strikes, protests and sit-ins a day after U.S. President Donald trump revealed the long-awaited details of the plan, denouncing it as ridiculously lop-sided and saying it gives them no rights.

"Trump's words mean nothing to us. This isn't his land for him to bargain or sell or give to someone else," said Sawsan Warde, a middle-aged Palestinian woman at the crowded Bourj al-Barajneh camp in the Lebanese capital’s suburbs. "He can give the Jewish people or Netanyahu a part of his land, but Palestine is for us. It was, it is and will always be ours."

The words reflected the deep bitterness felt by Palestinians at the plan unveiled by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday. The plan supports the Israeli position on nearly all of the most contentious issues in the decades-old conflict and falls far short of Palestinian demands, leaving them with disjointed areas and allowing Israel to annex its settlements in the occupied territory.

"A thousand no's," said Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in response.

Among Palestinian refugees, many likened the plan to the Balfour Declaration, the British government's promise in 1917 to Zionists to create a Jewish home in Palestine.

"This is an extension of the Balfour declaration," said Mariam Jibril, who took part in a protest at the Ain el-Hilweh refugee camp -- an overpopulated, sprawling territory in the southern city of Sidon that houses up to 70,000 refugees and their descendants.

"Trump thinks he controls the world and other countries. He imposes sanctions, opens and closes embassies as he wishes. ... The world doesn't work this way," she said, saying Palestinians need to fight back with weapons because diplomacy and negotiations do not work.

Protesters burned tires and pictures of Trump and Netanyahu. They also set fire to American and Israeli flags. Many expressed outrage at Gulf Arab countries they see as complicit in the plan unveiled Tuesday. Representatives from the Arab countries of Bahrain, Oman and the United Arab Emirates were present at the White House on Tuesday, but there were no Palestinian representatives.

Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were forced out of what is now Israel during the 1948 war around its creation. Those refugees and their descendants now number around 5 million and are scattered across the region. The Palestinians believe they have the "right of return" to former properties, something Israel has always rejected, saying it would destroy Israel's Jewish character.

The White House plan says "there shall be no right of return by, or absorption of, any Palestinian refugee into the state of Israel." It says refugees can live in the state of Palestine, become citizens of the countries where they live or be absorbed by other countries, adding that the U.S. will try to provide "some compensation" to refugees.

"It is shameful and it makes you want to cry," said Warde. "The collusion by Arab countries is what makes us want to cry even more. Whether from Bahrain or the UAE, we would never have thought an Arab country would take this stance."

Many said a return to armed conflict was now inevitable.

"Neither Trump nor Netanyahu can decide for the 13 million Palestinian people that this land belongs to Israel," said Mahmoud al-Haj, whose family hails from what is now the Israeli city of Safed.

"This is the land of our grandfathers and we will not give up Palestine which will only come back through resistance and arms."

Comments 3
Missing phillipo 30 January 2020, 12:05

The woman in the photo doesn't look over 70, so she can't have been born anywhere other than where she is now, so therefore according to UNHCR SHE IS NOT A REFUGEE.

Missing phillipo 31 January 2020, 09:33

That is why many countries are now refusing to donate money to UNRWA, as it does not fit in withthe UN and UNHCR definitions of refugees.
Why do the Palestinians think that they deserve special treatment and a separate organisation? In 1947 India and Pakistan had 3-4 times more refugees than the Palestinians, they had no separate organisation and each side has incorporated the refugees and given them citizenship. In 1948 at the same time as the refugees were persuaded by their leadership to leave their home in Israel, 800.000 Jew were expelled from Arab countries, becoming refugees,but not a single one was left living in a camp or without citizenship of the country they arrived in (not only Israel).
So again, why should the Palestinians be different from others?

Thumb kanaanljdid 30 January 2020, 19:10

Well, did they accept anything or any solution for the past 100 years ? Lebanon's interest is not in being hijacked by these die-hard supporters of eternal war against Israel. Even if they got 99% of Israel and Palestine land, they will say it is shameful and not enough.