Sarkozy Orders New Text as Armenian Genocide Law Ruled Unconstitutional
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
France's top court ruled Tuesday that a law backed by President Nicolas Sarkozy to punish denial of the Armenian genocide was unconstitutional as it infringed on freedom of expression.
Turkey welcomed the ruling -- but Sarkozy, whose right-wing party had put forward the bill, swiftly vowed to draft a new version of the law that has plunged France's relations with Turkey into crisis.
Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their forebears were killed in a 1915-16 genocide by Turkey's former Ottoman Empire. Turkey says 500,000 died and ascribes the toll to fighting and starvation during World War I.
France had already recognized the killings as a genocide, but the new law sought to go further by punishing anyone who denies this with up to a year in jail and a fine of 45,000 euros ($57,000).
However, the Constitutional Council labeled the law an "unconstitutional attack on freedom of expression" and it said it wished "not to enter into the realm of responsibility that belongs to historians".
Turkey quickly welcomed the ruling on the law which Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has denounced as "tantamount to discrimination and racism".
Turkey's deputy prime minister Bulent Arinc said on Twitter the ruling "has averted a potentially serious crisis in Turkish-French ties".
The decision "does not indulge political concerns," Arinc said after Sarkozy was accused of pandering to an estimated 400,000 voters of Armenian origin ahead of an April-May presidential election.
The top court "gave a lesson in law to the French politicians who signed the bill, which was an example of absurdity," said Arinc.
Turkey's EU Affairs Minister Egemen Bagis said France had averted a "historical mistake", and Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu called the decision "an important step that will legally avert future exploitations".
However, Sarkozy's office quickly put out a statement saying the president "has ordered the government to prepare a new draft, taking into account the Constitutional Council's decision."
Sarkozy noted "the great disappointment and profound sadness of all those who welcomed with hope and gratitude the adoption of this law aimed at providing protection against revisionism."
After winning passage in the National Assembly and Senate, the law was put on hold in January after groups of senators and MPs opposed to the legislation demanded that its constitutionality be examined.
The groups gathered more than the minimum 60 signatures required to ask the council to test the law's constitutionality.
At least two ministers, Foreign Minister Alain Juppe and Agriculture Minister Bruno Le Maire, had spoken out against the bill.
Ankara has already halted political and military cooperation with France and had threatened to cut off economic and cultural ties.
Trade between the two states was worth 12 billion euros ($15.5 billion) in 2010, and several hundred French businesses operate in Turkey.

In France, the Gayssot Act, voted for on July 13, 1990, makes it illegal to question the existence of crimes that fall in the category of crimes against humanity as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the basis of which Nazi leaders were convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-46. When the act was challenged by Robert Faurisson, the Human Rights Committee upheld it as a necessary means to counter possible antisemitism.
That doesn't infringe on freedom of expression but this does? Seems contradictory. It should either be no to both laws or yes to both.

This is complete cover for the corrupted regimes of the middle east like Iran, Syria, and Turkey will do no good for the future of economy and freedom, stop this culture of corruption by allowing the criminals to hijack the future of the minorities in middle east.

This is a wise decision taken by the French top court. Such matters should be left to historians and to the decendants of the peoples involved i.e. the current Turkish and Armenian peoples. Otherwise, the world will have to be consistent and apply same standards to atrocities and injustices inflicted on the Algerians during the French colonial period, Africans enslaved during the 15th to 19th century, Native Americans genocides, Spanish Muslims and Jews masacared during The Spanish Inquisitions, Palestians sufferings inflicted by the Zionists etc.