Jumblat Says Support for Syria Uprising 'Doesn't Mean Change in Alliances'

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat on Sunday stressed that his support for the Syrian uprising does not imply a change in his domestic alliances, noting that his ministers will not resign from Premier Najib Miqati’s government.

“We stress the firm stances: we will stay in this government and we are with (Hizbullah’s) weapons in order to defend Lebanon in the face of Israel, but we reject the use of arms domestically,” Jumblat said during a meeting with his party’s cadres in the Mount Lebanon town of al-Khalwat.

“Nowadays, we have chosen to side with the Syrian people, but that does not mean a change in alliances. We have agreed with Hizbullah to manage our differences. They have their point of view concerning the Syrian regime but I won’t discuss it now, and we have our point of view which is supportive of the Syrian people, and in my opinion they will eventually realize that they were mistaken,” Jumblat added.

He also noted that Moscow will sooner or later regret its support for the regime in Damascus, calling on Russia and China to “rescue Syria” and stressing that the regime’s crackdown on dissent will only lead to “further killings, displacement and destruction.”

The Druze leader also stressed commitment to the “settlement” reached with Hizbullah in the wake of the May 7, 2008 clashes.

“We changed alliances in order to prevent civil strife,” Jumblat said, referring to his decision in 2011 to join Miqati’s cabinet, which is described by its political rivals as “Hizbullah’s government.”

Turning to the issue of the U.N.-backed Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Jumblat called on Hizbullah to defend itself in court.

The STL has accused four Hizbullah members of involvement in the 2005 assassination of former premier Rafik Hariri.

“The method of political assassination was introduced by the Syrians,” Jumblat charged, referring to the period between 1976 and 2005, when Syrian forces were stationed in Lebanon.

Addressing Hizbullah’s controversial arsenal of weapons, the Druze leader said the party’s arms will in due course become under the authority of the Lebanese state, calling on the March 14 camp to engage in dialogue with Hizbullah without preconditions.

“Residents of the South consider these arms as part of their dignity and pride, and believe they are the first line of defense (against Israel). One day, I believe they will demand that these arms be under the Lebanese army’s authority, but that cannot be achieved through telling them ‘you either hand over your arms or we cannot talk’,” Jumblat added.

“Dialogue is the only way to communicate with the dear Shiite sect, that’s why those calling for disarming (Hizbullah) -- or rather seeking to remove weapons at any cost -- are mistaken,” he went on to say.

Comments 21
Default-user-icon MUSTAPHA O. GHALAYINI (Guest) 08 April 2012, 19:35

jumblat is serving lebanon inside the gvmt more than he is outside.
but i dont know how walid beik is maintaining stable relations with hizb,hassoun knows that mikati gvmt is the last gvmt under his control.
i hope walid beik can finish his game b4 getting killed.

Thumb jcamerican 08 April 2012, 19:43

Very interesting views.

Missing beirutbastard00 11 April 2012, 02:26

U just described a politician.

Missing usjabaley 08 April 2012, 20:19

indeed!

Missing realist 08 April 2012, 21:58

Does that mean you too have realized that the regime in Syria is doomed and that you as an f.t. support the revolution lol?

Missing realist 08 April 2012, 22:02

Can Russia really afford another year of support for regime atrocities in Syria? Lavrov clearly thinks that the people are not gona back down (another fact inferred in lavrov statements). Was Russia able to support to Milosovich to the end ?..anyone with a clear head will realize that sooner or later the people in Syria will prevail.

Missing mohammad_ca 08 April 2012, 22:36

so let's see, he supports the STL, he is against the Syrian regime and against Hhizbolla's weapons internally....what is making him different from the M14 camp? lol I wonder when M8ers are going to realize this dude is playing the and taking the for a ride lol

Missing realist 09 April 2012, 05:11

f.t, jumblatt is only saying nice words to M8 cause he is afraid for his life, grow up, he hates their gutts in his heart and he does not believe that anyone will hand any weapons, unless you believe the earth is flat you believe any of that will happen. Let me give you a dim/realistic expectation. There will be more weapons in lebanon instead of less following the chaos/collapse of the syrian government/society, there will be another fundamentalist organization with weapons to counter the hizzies. I hope in my heart that i am wrong, but that is what history suggests.

Default-user-icon Sebouh80 (Guest) 08 April 2012, 23:08

Walid Jumblat's politics has always been built on contradictions.

So it would be unwise to take his words seriously.

Thumb shab 08 April 2012, 23:34

Only filth takes pride in arms that has only been used to murder civlian Lebanese

Thumb primesuspect 09 April 2012, 16:19

We're not Arabs, moreover, they are Persians.

Missing beirutbastard00 11 April 2012, 02:30

All 3 of u sound stupid.

Thumb primesuspect 09 April 2012, 04:29

Jumbo jumby is funny. Is anyone still listening to him? Well, except some fools like us ^^

Default-user-icon Youssef (Guest) 09 April 2012, 04:38

Funny this happens after Geagea's assassination attempt. Is the intimidation/death threat tactics at work again?

Missing beirutbastard00 11 April 2012, 02:32

That's quite a stretch.

Thumb benzona 09 April 2012, 05:17

not sure what's more captivating, watching my series Games of thrones or reading stuff about Wally(gator).

Missing cedars 09 April 2012, 05:41

Let's summarize what Jumblat said: Assassinations were introduced by the Syrians regime, and who is executing them on the ground since 1976?
It is okay if I re-arm and have weapons outside the state authority for now but let's not use it for internal disputes which is why I switch sides, who is guarding those weapons to draw the line? or I'll ask the question in a different way who has the highest authority of the land? the state or militias?
Then thru dialogue everything will be resolved? no it does not work as it has not worked for 35 yrs, the only way out is to write a new law that every bullet must be received thru the Army and in turn the Army can funnel it to whomever in the case of state of emergency (Attack on the state), it's illegal for any party or individual to receive or engage in any arms deals period as the security of every street belong to the ISF.

Missing beirutbastard00 11 April 2012, 02:34

Lol ok so we pass a law... Then what? How do u solve our fear n hate of each other if not thru dialogue?

Missing helicopter 09 April 2012, 09:09

Yes cedars... this is how it should be.

Default-user-icon lubnaan (Guest) 09 April 2012, 15:39

about time he took a stance against the people that killed his father

Missing beirutbastard00 11 April 2012, 02:37

He took that stance in 2005, n we seen how that turned out. He needs to keep his mouth closed n hope for the best, like all the other politician r doing.