Pietton: Protection of Lebanon from Regional Developments Vital after Geagea’s Attempted Murder

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

French Ambassador to Lebanon Denis Pietton said Saturday that Lebanon would have been placed in a very dangerous situation if Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea was killed.

In an interview published in An Nahar daily, Pietton expressed concern at the situation in Lebanon after Geagea escaped an assassination attempt as he was walking in the garden of his fortified residence in Maarab.

“We strongly condemn it. Had it succeeded God forbid, Lebanon would have been in a very dangerous situation,” he said.

The alarm that the murder attempt sent calls for strong efforts to protect Lebanon from the developments in its surroundings.

“Whether this was called a policy of distancing itself (from the Syrian crisis) or not, the protection of Lebanon from the developments becomes much more important,” Pietton told his interviewer.

“It is in the interest of Lebanese officials to preserve national unity and dialogue so that the Syrian crisis does not expand to Lebanon,” he said.

Pietton urged Lebanese officials to resume the national dialogue under President Michel Suleiman “even if it was not immediately productive.”

On the 2013 parliamentary elections, the ambassador said the polls should be held on time.

“It would be a big mistake to postpone them under the excuse of waiting as to what’s going to happen in neighboring countries,” he told An Nahar.

“I agree that the attempted murder against Geagea was aimed at stirring LF fears and maybe an organized chaos because it’s not clear who would take charge after him and this would affect the (results of ) the elections,” he said.

Comments 7
Thumb chrisrushlau 21 April 2012, 16:20

So the French government recognizes that this warlord is a warlord. But perhaps Geagea is France's preferred warlord. "It's not clear who would take charge after him". Definitely France wants a warlord, so they (who exactly in France?) can know who will take charge. And since Hezbullah is not mentioned, nor Jumblatt, etc., can we assume France wants a Christian (minority) warlord? If the STL weakens Hezbullah with its dubious telecoms evidence, would that worry this France?
"National unity and dialogue" means "Taif Accord". If "France" wanted democracy in Lebanon, one-voter one-vote, equal representation, it would say it wanted equal representation and an end to the confessional political system.
So what does "France" want? Despite its denial, it wants "organized chaos". Unfortunately, France would need how many thousand soldiers in Lebanon to keep democracy from happening. It may already have its new Napoleon.

Missing peace 21 April 2012, 16:54

lol! if france asked all you said , you would have said that france is meddling with lebanese affairs! so funny

Missing applesandoranges 21 April 2012, 21:38

Dr.Samir Geagea was a warlord during the civil war (like so many current government and opposition figures). Now though, he is a first-class politician whether you like it or not.
By the way, before asking whether France wanted democracy and one-voter-one-vote in Lebanon, go ahead and ask your speaker and his "minion" our foreign affairs minister the reason for obstructing the expatriates votes in local parliamentary elections.

Default-user-icon Sam (Guest) 21 April 2012, 16:30

@chrisrushlau: You are a confused individual.

Default-user-icon Sam (Guest) 21 April 2012, 17:27

@ chrisrushlau: You are truly confused!!

Default-user-icon Drake (Guest) 21 April 2012, 17:42

It's more like Geagea's fabrication of an attempted murder. The fabrications and the farce must go on. How else can they continue to brain-flush their bright followers?

Default-user-icon Le Phenicien (Guest) 22 April 2012, 06:09

He who assassinates Lebanese political figures serves as slave for an evil foreign master, that is M8(Iran and Syria puppets)
France has always stood by the Lebanese, for the blind to read history and get the facts.