Geagea Calls for Dialogue to Resolve Lingering Disputes

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea considered on Thursday that the Lebanese foes should reconsider dialogue to confront the current situation in the country and to achieve swift solutions over the electoral law and other main issues.

Geagea expressed readiness to resume dialogue with the rival parties to resolve the ongoing disputes.

Lebanon plunged in a political crisis in October after the opposition blamed the government for the assassination of Internal Security Forces Intelligence Branch chief Wissam al-Hasan.

The March 14 opposition alliance boycotted dialogue despite President Michel Suleiman's extensive efforts to resume talks between the rival factions.

The last dialogue session was held on September 20.

Geagea pointed out in comments published in As Safir newspaper that there is a chance for parties to reach consensus on an electoral law.

The main political parties in the country have failed to reach common ground on an electoral law, prompting Suleiman and Prime Minister Najib Miqati to sign an electoral decree setting elections on June 9 based on the 1960 law of the winner-takes-all system.

The decision angered several parties that stressed the importance of reaching an agreement over the matter.

Asked about the fear of the rise of Islamic extremism, Geagea stressed that the March 14 alliance, in particular, al-Mustaqbal, favor moderation, calling for fortifying the role of the state, security forces and the army.

“The main political factions support this option,” the LF chief said.

He stated that the Lebanese have to “safeguard the state and the Islamic-Christian moderation and to renew communication to resolve the sharp disputes.”

Concerning Hizbullah's alleged interference in the Syrian turmoil, Geagea said that the party's stance and direct meddling in battles to support the Syrian regime against rebels “will definitely lead to negative repercussions on Shiites in Lebanon and the region.”

“Hizbullah should have abided by the dissociation policy and supported the regime without getting involved in its battles,” he added.

Hizbullah has been accused of sending fighters to Syria to support the regime of President Bashar Assad against the rebel fighters.

Comments 4
Thumb jabal10452 07 March 2013, 14:20

IKarim, first I appreciate your statement about Bashir. We have something in common here. Second, when it comes to Samir: Yes, he has hands and he is the first to admit it. He was one of the main players in the civil war just like Berri, Jumblat and the rest. But Karim, he was the only one who paid anything for his role: 11 years in solitary confinement. Maybe you feel that it is not enough, but it sure is much more then Jumblat and Berri and the rest of this sorry crew. While he was in prison, they were free and enjoying their millions of dollars. Since his release from prison he has been consistent and clear in his stance and that is: all arms should be in the hands of the state. You deride him for calling for dialog. Would you be happier of if he called for war? You should be happy that he constantly advocates dialog or legal action for solving our conflicts. He is also the only warlord to have ever publicly apologized and asked for forgivness for his mistakes.

Thumb jabal10452 07 March 2013, 14:21

sorry, I meant he has blood on his hands.

Missing allouchi 07 March 2013, 14:37

May god protect our Hakim...he truly cares about our country...

Missing abraham 07 March 2013, 17:19

Is this the same person who said 6 months ago, dialogue is waste of time. and that's why he didin't attnd the National dialogue meeting.
Woow