Diplomats: West has 'Hard Evidence' of Syria Chemical Weapons

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Western nations have "hard evidence" that chemical weapons have been used at least once in the Syrian war but a U.N. investigation is now unlikely to get into the country, diplomats said Thursday.

President Bashar Assad's government asked the U.N. to investigate its claims against rebel forces. But it is now refusing to let international experts into the country because the U.N. wants to look into claims against Assad's forces.

"In one case we have hard evidence," a western diplomat told reporters, commenting on the rival claims.

"There are several examples where we are quite sure that shells with chemicals have been used in a very sporadic way," added the diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity and without giving details of the evidence.

A diplomat from a U.N. Security Council nation also said that "quite convincing" evidence had been sent to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to back accusations against Assad's forces.

Britain and France have submitted information to the United Nations about allegations that government forces used chemical arms in the city of Homs on December 23 and at Ataybah near Damascus last month. Neither has disclosed details but the Homs case is said to be the most serious of the two.

The Syrian government called for a U.N. investigation after it said opposition rebels fired a chemical weapon shell into Khan al-Assal in Aleppo province on March 19.

Syrian government troops were among those killed or wounded in the attack, according to diplomats.

The U.N. has assembled a team of international experts, led by Ake Sellstrom of Sweden, in the region. But Syria's Foreign Minister Walid Muallem wrote to Ban this week saying his government could not accept an inquiry that went beyond the Aleppo incident.

"It is regrettable that the Syrian government has rejected my offer to engage in (an) investigation," Ban said Thursday after talks with US President Barack Obama in Washington.

Ban had demanded "unfettered access" to all of Syria before sending the team. "They are now ready. They can be deployed any time soon; so this is my urgent appeal," Ban told reporters.

U.N. Security Council diplomats said communications between the Syrian government and the United Nations had been severely cut back. They added that the chemical weapons inquiry was now likely to fall victim to divisions on the 15-nation council.

Russia and China have blocked three council resolutions intended to increase pressure on Assad over the conflict, including by threatening sanctions.

But with the conflict worsening -- well over 70,000 people have now been killed -- the international showdown over the conflict has also deteriorated. Ban has blamed the divisions for the failure to make progress on a negotiated settlement to the war.

"It is obvious that the Security Council is going to go nowhere on Syria. It is totally blocked," said a senior council envoy.

Comments 17
Thumb geha 12 April 2013, 08:19

where is mowaten?
is this acceptable? chemical weapons against civilians?

Missing realist 12 April 2013, 19:21

Syrian government or Syrian gang rejected the investigation after calling for it, did you read that genius? Murderers and you are a neo Nazi

Thumb banima3roof 12 April 2013, 23:58

more like did you read the article because you missed the whole point of: "But it [syrian govt] is now refusing to let international experts into the country because the U.N. wants to look into claims against Assad's forces."

but you want us to believe what the dictator said about the deaths of his troops? he kills his troops who defect everyday!

Default-user-icon Truth (Guest) 12 April 2013, 08:27

By refusing a UN inspection, Assad has alredy indicted himself, the same way Khamenei has with the nuclear file. Two outlaws that will hopefully be eradicated soon!

Thumb jcamerican 12 April 2013, 12:44

Saddam refused and he had nothing. What is your point?

Missing samiam 12 April 2013, 21:29

actually, technically speaking he gassed and killed thousands of kurds, so try another argument. The nuclear thing was a fraud obviously but the chemical thing is a fact.

Thumb LebCynic 12 April 2013, 09:35

Hard evidence? Where is this evidence more important what is the evidence?

Default-user-icon Skyfall (Guest) 12 April 2013, 17:57

Geagea did not choose sunni wahhabis, he made it clear though he accepts the support of KSA, they are a regime of wahhabism and they do not support that. Read ur facts and precedent articles. Nasrallah has always talked about an islamic state and His ally Iran is an islamic state. Hariri has never talked about an islamic state and yet has an islamic ally as well. What is the difference? Hariri accepted all beliefs in his mustaqbal bloc, he brought you riad salameh, which is one of the best bank governors in the world, he built the downtown, the airport, middle east back again. You all fools think that cost only few millions??? a mini bridge here in canada like the once dbayeh bridge costs a minimum of 100 million... + the syrians were eating the money with ur lahoud friend and Jumblat & Co..

Default-user-icon Skyfall (Guest) 12 April 2013, 18:03

Of course you will hear bad things about Hariri, as the lebanese people are like that, always complaining. Yes he bought houses and lands downtown for what it was WORTH back then! if those families did bad business and then saw the lands get a lot more expensive, they complained that Hariri bought it cheap and they were forced to sell to not appear loosers and stupid business men..... We all know lebanese people mentality, Hariri has helped Aschrafieh during the war giving bread, olive oil and other supplies, i wonder who did that? you are hating a man that has given you everything he could. You say he was with the syrians , he was yes because he was obliged ! he created world connections in order to do something about it like the UN 1559 that moved the syrians after the lebanese revolution out of Lebanon.

Default-user-icon Skyfall (Guest) 12 April 2013, 18:03

He was no warlord he could not do anything else! bunch of hypocrites and beggars, you never saw what Rafik Hariri gave you, he was killed by Israeli mossad with Hezbollah double agents in connection with their syrians beloved allies that you fools still think are ennemies...

Missing realist 12 April 2013, 19:23

And rebels used MIGs and scuds and killed their own families and children. More like your dog bashar being pushed back gradually. Another neo racist Nazi you are.

Missing idris_gray 12 April 2013, 22:06

Whatever you think of the rebels (as if they are all the same), bashar is a dog and a mass murderer. There's no way around it.

Missing peace 12 April 2013, 22:19

no bashar is not a mass murderer he takes care of his people according to M8ers....

Missing idris_gray 12 April 2013, 22:25

baathist logic: in order to show who is the biggest defender of arab nationalism, I will kill hundreds of thousands of arabs.

Missing idris_gray 12 April 2013, 19:31

the rebels are being pushed back gradually? lol Which war are you watching?

Missing idris_gray 12 April 2013, 22:02

Eyewitnesses like SANA? If gambling wasn't haram, I would bet everything that FSA wins this war. Don't delude yourself.

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 13 April 2013, 01:06

You used to fight alongside Bachir you say? Yet these days you say let Bashar stay even though he kills us because the alternative will kill us more and worse? Let me ask you again, you used to fight alongside the greatest patriot Lebanon has ever seen? Go take a long hard look in the mirror my friend then come back read your posts again.