Hizbullah Strongly Denies Involvement in Syria Clashes
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
Hizbullah on Friday strongly denied media reports accusing the Shiite party of being involved in the ongoing clashes in Syria, describing them as “rumors aimed at inciting sectarian tensions.”
“Lately, some Arab and Israeli media outlets and a number of websites have been circulating rumors accusing Hizbullah of being involved in the military confrontations taking place in some Syrian regions,” said Hizbullah in a statement.
Those media outlets, according to the statement, have also reported that Hizbullah members were killed in clashes between Syrian security forces and protesters.
The party accused certain media outlets of “fabricating names of alleged (Hizbullah) martyrs.”
It said the aforementioned media reports were “part of the same conspiracy targeting Syria and the resistance movements” in the region.
10 June 2011, 22:59
11
لا تتصوروا كم يسيء حزب الله للطائفة الشيعية سواء داخل او خارج لبنان. أمس قرأت لكاتب شيعي يطالب الحزب نفسه بأن يمنع أمينه العام من القاء اي كلمة بعد الآن. الشعب السوري يكرهنا كشيعة وكذلك المصري ونصف سكان البحرين وجميع شعوب منطقة الخليج وأكثر بكثير من نصف سكان لبنان، فالى أين يمضي حزب الله بالشيعة اللبنانيين باسم مقاومة ليس فيها الا الاسم فقط وهو الذي لم يطلق رصاصة على اسرائيل منذ خمس سنوات ؟.. نحن كشيعة نعتذر من الجميع من مسيئات حزب الله.
10 June 2011, 23:21
23
As usual, hizbullah dinies involvement in Syria, as they denied involvement in Egypt, Bahrain and Kuwait. They are masters in prostituting the "resistance" name while they are nothing but a bunch of thugs and assassins.
10 June 2011, 23:27
10
To be credible Hezbollah should condemn the slaughter of peaceful Syrian protester and appeal to the Syrian regime in order to stop its repression.
Denial is not enough, especially when Nassrallah sided with Assad and expressed his full support for his regime.
10 June 2011, 23:57
11
hassan supported the regime in his suppression openly,if this is not invovment,it's what?
11 June 2011, 02:38
11
jazeera has become the voice of the muslim brotherhood. The ones supporting what's going on in Syria will also pay the price if the regime goes down. They want to replace bad with worst. Real smart.
It is clear the powers are trying for a sunni-Shia war and I hope they don't get it. Don't be stupid guys.
11 June 2011, 03:41
01
Sunni - Shia clash ...
Nothing new, these two tribes been battling it out since Islam became a concept.
They are holding the region hostage..
May the strongest win ...
11 June 2011, 06:23
10
Al-Jazeera was glorified as the voice of the Arab's true resistance against the West until it's started reporting on the event in Syria. How can anything be worth than this .. General Aoun: "By the way, I remind you here that the Syrian regime had said that it came to Lebanon to save its Christians from extermination. I want to ask this regime who, apart from it, in fact wanted to exterminate us?"
11 June 2011, 08:32
01
"urotherside" I quote for agreement,
by the way the news outlets both arab and international have twisted this uprising beyond facts and turned it into a propaganda machine to create chaos in the arab world, one such news agency to the surprise of many but not to some has been " AL Jazeera" channel, whcih has now made huge business deals with the Brittish comapnies and qatar recently signed off an enormous multi million billion dollar security deal with a comapny whos president been runnin pro zionist history for decades.
whats really happeining in syria on the ground is very different than whats being said outside, and this has been proven countless times by false imagery videos and reporting , they are paying people thousands of fdollars to act things out, recently a number of european incluiding a well known german news agency confirmed and apologized for the mislead info and news they had received and aired. by the way the demo numbers are nowhere near that high.
11 June 2011, 09:53
12
The Syrian army doesn't need any help to finish the job against these Sunni Salafi Wahhaby terrorists .
11 June 2011, 10:31
12
I often wonder why some people in Lebanon are quick to defend the Assad regime, giving all sorts of excuses and justifications for doing as much. Statements like "you don't know what's going to come next" and "the current regime is better than the one which will follow it" gloss over the fact that the Assad regime(s) have meant nothing but disasters for Lebanon. Invasion of the country, occupation that lasted 29 years, continuous interference in the country's internal affairs, disappearance of thousands of citizens and other atrocities are conveniently cast aside because of "what will come next".
The worst replacement of the current regime will not be worse than the one already in place. So, why worry? Take a chance on a new regime. It may be just as bad as the current one but it may turn out to be better.
11 June 2011, 15:00
11
@ le phenicien - thousands of civilians in the street in Syria, and they are all Sunni Salafi Wahhaby terrorists? R u for real?
11 June 2011, 18:30
00
Ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmazing. Hizballah supported all the uprising in the arab world. But Syria.
I rest my case.
