سقوط صواريخ من الأراضي السورية على الهرمل والقاع

dont be a hypocrite, you wouldnt have cared anyway. dont pretend you have a righteous excuse for your sectarian hatred and double standards.
about akkar though you can't say it was the syrian army, as i was telling the other drone earlier:
hitting akkar served no objective whatsoever for the syrian army, whereas the rebels are desperate to get lebanese to come fight for them. throwing a few shells on akkar and blaming on the syrian army creates anger that serves that purpose.

sectarian MF (MF stand for "My Friend", of course)

Everynow and then u hear on the news that the army arrested a camion transporting amunitions, arms to syria from ersal but when did hear the army arresting some hezbollah fighters and arms going to syria?...are they invisible or the "governement" cause any army takes order by the governement , or the governement has double standards?????
And that's a fact...

My allegeance is to my country

I wish i could say to my people, but my people are going nuts and i cannot find any clear base to start with them, so why not start by lebanon?... U know there is still plenty to fix inthere....

thefact: i agree in substance but just something: the syrian army did attack some border areas around arsal, not akkar. the hits were on targets in the barren mountains, the no-man's-land around arsal, suggesting they were targeting smugglers and/or rebel hideouts.

the hits on akkar were different, shells fell on residential areas inside cities, and therefore suggesting they were random hits. this is why i believe they were done by the rebels to fuel anger against the syrian army

also in the no man's land of arsal the hits were done by helicopters, meaning they had direct visual on the target and knew what they were hitting. in akkar shells were fired by mortars several kilometers away, this is why i said random.

i'm not saying the location makes a difference, i'm saying the situations were different.
one was a targeted strike, the other random shells.