U.S. Rejects U.N. Suggestion Its Syria Airstrikes Could Constitute 'War Crimes'

W460

Washington's top envoy for Syria rejected Thursday an allegation put forward in a U.N. report that some U.S.-led air strikes in the conflict-torn country could possibly be categorized as indiscriminate attacks, amounting to "war crimes."

James Jeffrey, the U.S. special representative on Syria, dismissed findings published in a U.N. report on Wednesday suggesting that the US-led coalition had with a number of air strikes in the country "failed to employ the necessary precautions to discriminate adequately between military objectives and civilians."

The U.N. Commission of Inquiry, which has been investigating human rights violations in Syria's drawn-out war for the past eight years, pointed to a series of air strikes carried out by the coalition in January in the eastern province of Deir Ezzor, including one that killed 16 civilians.

"The Commission finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe that international coalition forces may not have directed their attacks at a specific military objective, or failed to do so with the necessary precaution," the report said.

"Launching indiscriminate attacks that result in death or injury to civilians amounts to a war crime in cases in which such attacks are conducted recklessly," stressed the Commission, which has also suggested in previous reports that U.S.-led strikes in Syria could amount to war crimes.

The Commission has also repeatedly accused the Syrian government and its main backer Russia, as well as other actors in the conflict of a wide range of war crimes.

"We take extreme care in every military operation," Jeffrey told journalists in Geneva when asked about the report.

"We do not accept the findings of that particular body," he said.

Jeffrey was in Geneva Wednesday for consultations with the UN envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen.

Pedersen, a seasoned Norwegian diplomat who took over the job in January, is trying to help create a committee to draft a post-war constitution for Syria.

His predecessor, Staffan de Mistura, stepped down after his four years in the post ended with a year-long abortive push to form the constitutional committee.

But Pedersen, who has been consulting extensively with the various Syrian actors, as well as with countries with influence in the conflict, voiced optimism that the constitutional committee could soon see the light of day.

Following his meeting with representatives from Britain, Egypt, France, Germany, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United States Thursday, he told journalists he was "confident that we are moving forward.

"Hopefully I can have positive news on this in the very near future."

Numerous rounds of UN-led peace talks have failed to end a war that has killed more than 370,000 people and displaced millions since it started in 2011 with the repression of anti-government protests.

Comments 2
Thumb chrisrushlau 13 September 2019, 00:07

France has proposed to Israel that Israel take over the management of Syria. Israel is said to be considering the proposal.

Missing phillipo 13 September 2019, 12:11

Assuming that your comment is trueful :
If Israel agreed, the situation in Syria couldn't be worse than it is at the moment.
The kids would be able to go to school, the wounded and the sick would be able to go to the hospitals, the Iranian thugs would be thown out of the country, the farmers would be able to tend their lands, and commerce and business would be able to thrive.
What could be bad in all that?