الخارجية السورية: بيان واشنطن بشأن السلاح الكيميائي "مليء بالاكاذيب"

What's funny is that the UN specifically documented FSA-Al Qaeda using chemical weapons, but no one else seems to care.

Finito la musica.... The end is nigh

It is funny that when there were claims that the rebels used chemical weapons the us denied the UN report and said that it had to be assad. The only reason the US has made these claims is because the rebels have started to lose ground and need US backing since the rebels plans are starting to fall apart

The US is looking for another Iraq, Afghanistan military adventure in the Middle East by fabricating accusations to support her adventures in Syria. I cannot give myself any logical and convincing reasons why this barbarian country the USA should interfere and stick her nose in other countries internal affairs, by supporting gangsters,Islamic fanatics. Whether the Syrian Government is good or bad, it is none of the USA business.

It's hard to say what the US stands to gain by arming or attacking Assad and his terrorist militias. On one hand, they have waited so long that the FSA has been weakened and foreign extremists are starting to marginalize them, and on the other, Assad has clearly crossed all red lines.

I hope they drop a precision missile on his palace and end this. Maybe a bunker buster up Hassan Ns hole as well.

Like ANYONE believes what the Syrian regime claims/states. Just look who is on their side....HA & Iran. Have these two scums ever told the truth? GO USA & allies. Clean the world from this disease!

If you want a clean record you murderous nazis, you allow the international press to cover the uprise, you allow the UN inspectors to check on soil and human remains ! Time for accountability is drwaing nearer you scumbags!

Wow I can't believe anyone is disputing or criticising the fact that Assad used chemical weapons. It's like when reports came out that hizbulla was fighting in Syria, all of them here jumped saying BLASPHEMY! Than later oh well they are there to protect a shrine, than their leader comes on TV and declares it a holy war and the mouse is out.

Yes, it's a known FACT chemical weapons have been used by Assad, regarding the UN report whomever idiot said the UN report recorded that the rebel used them is DEAD wrong, there was a single investigator out of over 50 that said she saw pissibilty of such. No one agreed with her and she has since been relieved of her duty. Most likely fell in the traps of the Assad propaganda machine

If this murderous nazi regime wants to come out clean , it will allow the international press to come to Syria , cover the uprising , and not shoot down reporters. It would also allow the UN inspectors to conduct a proper investigation into chemical weapons use ! They have indicted themselves, the same way the Iranian have in the pursuit of an arms nuclear program, and Hizbollah in the STL political murders file !

One more things with all due respect everyone rooting for Assad but go f yourselves. The rebels are fighting against all odds for their lives against Syrian army + Iranian army + hizbullah army + Russia weapons daily shipment.

The rebels are getting nothing for support barely some non lethal aid and some light weapons. Let's make this conflict a bit more on the fair side and allow them to fight for their rights.

Gabby Russia said the evidence is not enough people dying on camera from sarin gas it was orchestrated, their bodies taken to turkey for autopsy, it was planted in them, video of Syrian army using chemical weapons while two French journalists were there, these journalists were lying.... You can't convince someone who doesn't want to be convinced.

All you need is Hezb and Iranian boots to survive.

"Russia Says Evidence of Syrian Chemical Weapons Is 'Not Convincing'"

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/06/russia-syria-chemical-weapons-not-convincing/66234/

You al Qaeda sympathizers should really check a source or 2 before barking.

I will not attack your person since really its a waste of brain resources. So you are telling me ONE person out of 50 saying X happened for you proves your point is right?

Does that mean in your head that if 98% of the people tell you that the sky is blue but one or two people that in theory they could be color blind or blind or high on mushrooms tell you it's pink you'll believe them? Wow Whois the idiot now?