Ziad Doueiri Says Risked Jail to Film in Israel
Lebanese-U.S. director Ziad Doueiri said Friday he was willing to face jail to film his award-winning movie "The Attack" in Israel, flouting Lebanon's laws against entering the neighboring Jewish state.
Describing the production there as a "crazy trip", he told an audience at the Frankfurt Book Fair that it still bothered him that the movie, released this year, had been banned in the Arab world.
The film, adapted from a novel by Algerian writer Yasmina Khadra, portrays the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the eyes of a Palestinian doctor with Israeli citizenship who discovers that his wife carried out a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv.
Doueiri said the project had faced artistic, financial, legal and political challenges from the get-go, including objections to its portrayal of Israel by its main financers from Qatar and Egypt after the film's completion.
After a festival screening the Qatari team had asked for its name to be removed from the movie's credits and, when asked why, said "because you are showing the Jewish point of view", Doueiri recalled.
Its Egyptian producer later did the same, he said.
Lebanon and the 22-member Arab League then banned the film "simply because I hired, I worked with Israeli Jews", said Doueiri, who grew up in Beirut, stressing the film had to be shot where the story was set.
"The film had been sold everywhere except in the Arab world, which, unfortunately, bothered me a lot, and I am still thinking about it constantly," said the filmmaker, who worked as a cameraman for Quentin Tarantino on movies such as "Reservoir Dogs" and "Pulp Fiction".
"All we care about is telling the story."
The film was well received at a number of festivals including in Morocco and Dubai, and in April it received three awards at the COLCOA French film festival in Hollywood.
Doueiri, who has both U.S. and Lebanese citizenship, said his lawyer mother had warned him that for a Lebanese "the sentence of setting foot in Israel is three to five years in jail and hard labor".
"It's not a simple misdemeanor, it's not like going through a red light. This is a very serious thing."
But he also told the discussion on storytelling at the book fair that "of course I was willing to risk it. I didn't care.
"I thought I had a good story... I am not going to stop because some government is going to tell me 'you're not allowed to film'."
Doueiri, who was born in 1963 and grew up during Lebanon's civil war, acknowledged it had not been easy for him to go to Israel and work "with those people I demonized all my life".
But he said, to focus on producing the film, he had had to put all prejudices aside.
"And then you start slowly realizing that those people you considered enemies, who are also working in the arts, top-notch actors in Israel, share your values. They think like us," he said.
what a shame on the Retarded Lebanese authorities! inno they pretend they are honorable and they pretend that they dont know that most europeans and americans and even lebanese with foreign passports have two passports and have visited Israel and frequently visit Lebanon and Israel.
When you go to Israel, they stamp your visa on a separate sheet if you ask them to. Obviously Mr Doueiri would have had to use a patronym for his movie in order to remain anonymous and invisible.
I think you are wrong, it is lot easier for a person identified as an Arab to enter Israel than it is for a xxxx/Lebanese to explain to the authorities in Beirut why he should not be sent to jail for visiting Israel.
Pilgrims from all over the world, Christians and Moslems, including many from countries with which Israel does not have relations travel there every year with the knowledge of their governments. It is a pity that the Lebanese Government does not allow its citizens to go on their pilgrimages.
When I first started my travels to the Middle East in the 1960's I was asked at the Passport Office in Liverpool whether I wanted two passports, one for the Arab States and one for Israel.
Unfortunately, for over 30 years I have not been able to have two.
Exactly. Authorities fear that our opinion might diverge from theirs. We have a brain and we can appreciate or not an artistic production on our own.
As Duchamp said: «l'art c'est la vie», if you ban art, you ban life. Nobody has the right to do so. Not in Lebanon, not in Israel, not in Jamaica, not in Togo.
Ano TX,
Lebanese killed much more of their own during the civil war than Israel since its creation. Yet, we are now hanging out together everyday because we knew we had no other choice. We also don't have the luxury of choosing who our southern neighbour is. We have to end the hostilities one day or another. Don't count on aoun, jumblatt, nasrallah, hariri, geagea and the others. The longer they control our lives and borders, the better for them. They want Lebanon to remain archaic, obsolete, uncompetitive. I decided a long time ago that these people have no right to decide who we are at war with or who our enemies are. No2ta 3al water.
While Egypt and Jordan enjoy their peace treaty with Israel, while Princes, Amirs and the likes with shares and interests in global corporations are elbow deep with Israeli and Western businesses and interests, and while Israel pumps oil from disputed Lebanese territories, Lebanon is stuck deep inside a sea of quick sand that has crippled almost every aspect of Lebanese life and fundamentally transformed the country will deadly consequences. If a Lebanese person wants to go to Israel, he/she will find a way to do so and his/her risk. Some are driven for pilgrimage which the international community should organize, support and protect. If you want to exploit Israel, I would suggest lifting the ban from entering Israel and turn what has been dealt to us on its head.
The only reply you will get from Lebanese people to these remarks of your will be negative ones.
These are people who prefer to damage the economy and security of their own state rather than have peace, tranquillity and economic co-operation with their neighbour to the south.