Berri Hopes his Policy Statement Proposal Would Gain Ground
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةSpeaker Nabih Berri has said a proposal made by him could salvage the government, hoping that Premier Tammam Salam would not resign before Monday.
In remarks to As Safir daily published on Friday, Berri said: “If there were good intentions and readiness to reach a settlement, then this proposal should be accepted by the March 14” camp.
The Hizbullah-led March 8 alliance wants to legitimize Hizbullah's arms but March 14 is demanding that the resistance be put under the state's authority.
The speaker, who is also the head of the Amal movement allied with Hizbullah, hoped that Salam would allow more time for consultations on the resistance clause of the policy statement.
A seven-member ministerial committee tasked with drafting the blueprint has until Monday to complete its work or else the cabinet would be considered resigned and President Michel Suleiman would have to call for binding parliamentary consultations to name a new premier.
According to As Safir, Berri's proposal that was backed by Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat, a centrist, calls for adopting the following statement: “Out of the state's responsibility to preserve Lebanon's sovereignty, independence, unity and safety, the government stresses its duty to seek to liberate the rest of the occupied territories with all legitimate and possible means.”
The proposal “stresses that the resistance is an honest expression of the right of the Lebanese people in liberating their land and defending their dignity to confront Israeli aggression and greed.”
The statement adds the right of “holding onto their (Lebanese people's) waters and oil.”
Salam has threatened to resign before Monday to protest the failure of the rival March 8 and 14 alliances to resolve the deadlock on the resistance clause.
The 24-member cabinet met on Thursday but failed to reach a solution on the row. Another session is scheduled to take place on Friday.
I totaly agree with you... or if they want to be more honest let they use "hezbollah" in place of the resistance, or at least its official name "islamic resistance"...
Real banana republic...
Yes cedre the problem with what u are saying is who judge what is islamic or christian? I wish cenrtral affrican christian who are comitting attrocities worse than daech can be peacefull christians as i like to think of to (i'm a secular person so religion fir me is not a criteria) and i'm sure that we would also agree that muslims should be tolerants as they were some decades ago in their large majority...
Anyway this is a philosophical debate but i was refering to the fact of the hypochrisy used, it is the hezbollah not the resistance, and the official name of hezbollah resistance is "islamic resistance" (al moukawama al islamiya) so let them use this terminology
Anw...
Hello imagine1979, mckinl
How are you doing guys? good to "see" you again. Hope everything is ok with you guys
@mckinl
we already are paying a lot for basic services namely electricity and generators etc.....
so rather than resort to the IMF we should resort to the streets and kick out our politicians and replace them with new blood a new and honest politicians
Man always great post, i'm sure with hezbollah and berry we will leave prosperous in a wonderfull civil state, by the way how many costed majless al janoub?..
Have u heard of any pharmacetical scam lately, it is nice to put the fault on march 14 guys but on the level of corruption they both do very good (even bassilo for my dear fellows who stayed in tayyar seems so more wealthy than 10 years ago don't u think)
As usual mcknil, thx for ur very objective comments and go have some chupachups...
stop your hallucinations and useless economic analysis. Lebanon's increasing and accumulated debt is due to subpar and subsidized public services that are overloaded with public servants imposed by warlords such as Berri and Jumblatt. Privatizations will stop this bleeding and will improve the services.
" “If there were good intentions and readiness to reach a settlement, then this proposal should be accepted by the March 14” camp."
Why is it that if there's good intentions on the March 14 camp? Why not good intentions on March 8 camp? Why don't they stand down with their weapons and external B.S and do something for Lebanon instead of for Iran?