March 8 and 14 Take Anew Dispute on Spending to Parliament

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

A proposal by three March 8 lawmakers to probe alleged spending violations made between 1993 and 2011 is aimed at taking the dispute with the March 14 opposition to new levels, highly informed parliamentary sources said Sunday.

The proposal was made on Saturday by Loyalty to the Resistance bloc MP Ali Fayyad, Development and Liberation bloc lawmaker Yassine Jaber and Change and Reform bloc MP Ibrahim Kanaan to form a parliamentary investigative committee to “probe the violations of spending made since the beginning of 1993 until the end of 2011.”

The sources told An Nahar daily that this step is aimed at escalating the row that was sparked by the counter-accusations launched between the two sides during the latest three-day parliamentary session that assessed the performance of the March 8-led cabinet of Premier Najib Miqati.

During that session two March 14 MPs - George Adwan from the Lebanese Forces bloc and Phalange party’s Samer Saadeh – made requests to form parliamentary committees to investigate the issue of leasing of power-generating vessels and the general spending since 1990.

But the sources said that the Hizbullah, Amal and Change and Reform trio sought on Saturday to prevent the opposition from taking a unilateral action in accusing the March 8 forces of committing violations on the eve of the 2013 polls and to revive the growing financial dispute after the cabinet suffered from internal divisions on the $5.9 billion extra-budgetary spending bill of 2011.

The cabinet members argued during a session held on Wednesday whether President Michel Suleiman should sign the $5.9 billion bill after the parliament failed to approve it over conditions set by the opposition that it would vote for the bill only if the March 8 forces agree to settle the extra-budgetary spending made by the governments of ex-Premiers Fouad Saniora and Saad Hariri between 2006 and 2010.

The ministers loyal to Hizbullah, Amal and the Free Patriotic Movement exerted pressure on the president to use his constitutional authorities by resorting to article 58 of the constitution which allows him to issue a bill deemed urgent by the government after the failure of the legislature to approve it.

But Suleiman and ministers loyal to Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat insisted that carrying out such an act is illegal and would be subjected to a challenge because the bill includes violations.

MP Jaber refuted the accusations of the parliamentary sources in remarks to An Nahar, saying his request to form the investigative committee stems from his statement to parliament during the three-day session.

So did Fayyad and Kanaan, he said.

Jaber stressed that the request does not aim at creating committees to counter the opposition. Instead it means there is consensus on the necessity to form this committee to inspect the spending violations made in previous years.

Comments 7
Default-user-icon Chris (Guest) 29 April 2012, 10:08

We remind the President he signed it last year!

Thumb geha 29 April 2012, 11:56

I agree with you Ft, but you should also agree that a commission goes into the dealings of this government too :)
and let us put the thieves in jail together :)

Default-user-icon + oua nabka + (Guest) 29 April 2012, 16:58

m8 or m14 do not mess with the rights of the citizens
do not put politics where it should not be
as for the president if he wants to make politics with the public affairs let him at least propose a referrendum on all issues and let let the people decide after all
no voice above people s voice

Missing cedars 29 April 2012, 17:41

Ok, we audit and spend more time and money to foil and discover the bad boys, the big question will be can the ISF enter the controlled armed areas to detain the bad guys? We agree that the law is above all, but why is it only applied on one section of the land? Is it because those who carry arms and claim that they are fighting the enemy will have a CARTE Blanche for ever to do whatever they please, in essence the state is in a hostage situation, and the law cannot be exercised properly as long as you have a state within a state.

Missing peace 29 April 2012, 21:06

and when are they going to take care of the real problems of the lebanese citizens?????
no retirement pensions, no social security, no good salaries, no infrastructure, no plans to reduce pollution, no urban planning, no water, no electricity, no clean rivers, no green parks, no playgrounds for children, no transportation system, no......

Default-user-icon Former Lebanese (Guest) 29 April 2012, 22:08

Flamethrower,

You seem like you don't know your history. Hoss was Prime minister from 1998 to 2000 when he resigned. That's when Hariri was fed up with the puppet ministers they kept forcing on him. Do you also remember how many times Hariri resigned from the government because of the idiots they forced on him in his cabinet?

Default-user-icon Wally (Guest) 30 April 2012, 01:31

Come on Guys FT is Right.
Ashraf el ness :Emile Lahoud,Haraket Amal ou Nabih Berri,El Aoumi el Souri ou Assad Herdne,Michel Aoun ou el Few million $ he run away to France with,Hizballah ou its Drugs Cartel and car thieves gangs.Sleiman Franjieh ou Wizaret el Ashghel,Walid Jumblat ou Wizaret el Mhajarine.
Come Ft Please remind us,maybe i forgot to mention some of your Ashraf el ness ??