March 14 Christians Claim Bridging Differences with al-Rahi

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The misunderstanding between some March 14 Christian officials and Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi has ended and talks between the two sides will continue, a delegation that visited the head of the church in Bkirki announced on Friday.

“If there has been any summer cloud with Bkirki, then it has dissipated,” Phalange leader Amin Gemayel said after holding talks with al-Rahi along with the delegation that included MPs Butros Harb, Strida Geagea and Dori Shamoun, and former lawmakers Nayla Moawad, Fares Soaid, who is also the March 14 general-secretariat coordinator, and Camile Ziade.

Bishops Samir Mazloum and Boulos Sayyah also attended the meeting.

Without detailing al-Rahi’s remarks on Hizbullah’s arsenal and the situation in Syria, Gemayel said his statements “could be built upon.”

While stressing the price that the Lebanese paid during the Syrian hegemony on Lebanon, the Phalange leader rejected any Lebanese interference in Syria’s internal affairs.

But said: “Neutrality does not mean remaining neutral in our principles or the Syrian actions in Lebanon.”

He was referring to several security incidents on the Lebanese-Syrian border.

“The meeting was very friendly and positive and we hope that it would set the stage for a new period during which we would meet on new principles that protect Lebanon,” he told reporters.

“It was necessary for us to agree on the principles and the meeting was fruitful in that regard,” the former president added.

Relations between al-Rahi and the opposition’s Christians deteriorated after the patriarch made several controversial statements on the Syrian revolution and Hizbullah’s arms.

March 14 is a staunch supporter of the uprising in the neighboring country and calls for integrating Hizbullah’s arsenal in the state.

“A misunderstanding took place between us and him in the past over statements he made,” said Harb, adding “today’s meeting will mark a new phase of relations.”

Soaid, in his part, told reporters that there was no personal dispute between the opposition and the patriarch. He stressed, however, that March 14 has a clear stance from the local and regional developments.

“The main reason for our visit today is that the country and the region are going through a delicate phase that could have repercussions on Lebanon,” the former MP said.

“So it’s everyone’s responsibility to reach common grounds,” he added.

Geagea also said that al-Rahi heard all the delegation’s concerns which among others want to see the seat of the church above all conflicts and confrontations.

The March 14 Christian officials are preparing a document that sets their stance from the controversial issues, the members of the delegation announced after they handed the patriarch a memo on their vision on the role of Bkirki and the future of Christians in Lebanon and the region.

They said discussions with the head of the Maronite church will continue.

“There are some basic principles that we are not allowed to give up and we will meet Patriarch al-Rahi but away from the media spotlight,” said Moawad.

Comments 8
Thumb lebneneh 22 June 2012, 14:41

I look forward to the day when religion is separated from politics and politics is separated from religion. This is not an attack on religion but an attack on politics because politicians whether wearing suits or not use religion to control their followers by using religion or sect as the common element that unite them with their followers whereas otherwise there has to be ideas, morals and real leadership that make people trust a politician.

Thumb lebneneh 22 June 2012, 14:42

I look forward to a day when a politician speaks in the name of Lebanese as Lebanese not as Muslims or Christians.

Thumb geha 22 June 2012, 17:54

do you mean bkirki supports an iranian terrorist state?

Thumb normzz 22 June 2012, 19:35

Rise up people,make a new group invite all lebanese to join,but no politicians allowed. the free lebanon movment. 1st thing ,shout for support for the army to inforce the law with no ristrictions. No to divisions ,no to guns,no to ahzeb.make a new roof for all lebanese to stand under.no to history,whats in the past stays in the past."A new begining"

Reply

Thumb normzz 22 June 2012, 19:37

No1 wants to help. and not 1 politician has a goal in site fore a better lebanon. first things first,make ahzeb illegal in all of lebanon. give the army the power to inforce the law with a iron fist.make gun laws very tight.get caught with a gun, 1 year imprisonment no ifs or buts,dosnt matter who you are. put a big no to WAR in the media and in school's, no more religious divisions.politicians are public servants,not the other way around.

Missing tarator 23 June 2012, 06:49

Beware what you are asking for. You may be sick of bickering political parties but abolishing them and giving absolute powers to the army is a recipe for disaster. The first thing a militocracy will do is to take away your right to speak your mind freely.

Thumb liefighter 23 June 2012, 07:18

ban ahzeb, keep hizb Hassan,reiterate the baath state, you see how it ends

Missing tarator 23 June 2012, 06:40

A mending of the fences? Why bother?

The war of words between Rahi and Geagea and between Kabbani and Sanioura led to an unexpected result: less political declarations from the clerics. This should be seen as a positive result in a country that could use less rhetoric.