Lavrov Backs Transition in Syria but Rejects Solutions 'Dictated from Abroad'
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةRussia said Thursday it backed a political transition in Syria but rejected Western pressure to call for the exit of President Bashar Assad, ahead of international talks on ending the spiraling conflict.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov poured cold water on hopes that world powers have already agreed a common strategy ahead of the weekend talks in Geneva, saying Moscow was opposed to any solution imposed from abroad.
He also said it was a mistake to exclude Syria's ally Iran from Saturday's meeting of world and regional powers.
Assad's fate "must be decided within the framework of a Syrian dialogue by the Syrian people themselves," Lavrov told a news conference with his Tunisian counterpart.
"Foreign players should not be dictating their solutions to the Syrians. We do not and cannot support any intervention or solutions dictated from abroad," he said.
Lavrov said there was "clearly" a need for a political transition in Syria but said world powers had still not agreed on a final document based on proposals by U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan for the talks.
"There are no agreed drafts. Work on a possible final document continues," he said.
Lavrov complained bitterly that "individual working formulas" had been leaked to the press overnight. "I view this as a manifestation of an unfair approach to diplomacy."
Diplomats at the United Nations in New York said Annan has proposed setting up a Syrian transitional government in a bid to end the country's near 16-month conflict and that world powers generally back the plan.
Lavrov agreed that changes and reforms were much needed in Syria, saying: "We support changes which work towards national agreement on all questions of overdue reform.”
He said it was a mistake to exclude Syrian ally Iran from the Geneva talks, accusing the United States of "double standards" in opposing Tehran's attendance.
"Iran is an influential player in this situation and to leave it out of the Geneva meeting, I believe, is a mistake," Lavrov said, noting that Washington had agreed in the past to Iran joining talks on Iraq and Afghanistan.
"When the Americans needed to decide certain issues involving the security of their contingents in Iraq and Afghanistan, they initiated contact with Iran without wavering and agreed to something," Lavrov said.
U.S. officials have conceded Iran's influence over Syria while arguing that it had shown no good will thus far that could help support a political transition period backed by Western powers and Turkey.
God Bless and strengthen Russia and its people. They are a faithful and patriotic and honorable people. Lebanon and Syria are with you!
The level of stupidity this guy today and Clinton and Annan yesterday can rise to makes our leaders look decent. So he is basically saying Russia does not want Assad out. Oh, no shit. At least our leaders do not spend taxpayers dollars to fly somewhere like Geneva and have useless talks, they have their useless talks at the presidential palace and that saves money.
I cannot say I understood it as refusal to change Assad. Look carefully at key sentences. We are OK with transition. What bothered him is that info was leaked ahead of time. What is being said out loud , is definitely not what is discussed behind closed doors. I feel that the nose of the rope is tightening more and more around the neck of the regime and it won't be long we hear breaking news.
OK fair enough comrade Sergei, but would you accept a solution dictated by a broad. What if she had nothing on but fishnet stockings and army boots wielding a riding crop?
It appears the Russians have not yet been able to secure their required "reserve" to completely let go of Assad. Since they forced the Saturday meeting by agreeing to attend even before Annan announced it even if Iran is not invited leads one to believe the current bidding is not too far off from their required "reserve". Looking in anticipation to the weekend meeting, Lavrov's protestations not withstanding.