Jumblat: Assad's Collapse Doesn't Mean Hizbullah will Hand over Arms
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةLeader of the National Struggle Front bloc Walid Jumblat said on Friday that the collapse of Syrian President Bashar Assad will not make Hizbullah hand over its weapons as the March 14 alliance believes, assuring that the price will not be less than a new Taef agreement.
Jumblat called on all political powers to follow President Michel Suleiman's calls for a defense strategy stressing the necessity to avoid strife, he told As-Safir daily in an interview.
The Progressive Socialist Party leader criticized the stances of some political factions and the heated rhetoric adopted by some al-Mustaqbal party officials following the assassination of Internal Security Forces Information Bureau chief Wissam al-Hasan.
Hasan was assassinated in a massive bomb in October. His assassination was blamed on Syria and March 14 accused the government of PM Najib Miqati for covering the crime.
The alliances called for the resignation of the cabinet and boycotted all parliamentary activities.
A solution for the Lebanese crisis can only come form inside Lebanon, stressed Jumblat, noting that any help from other countries, similar to the Doha agreement in 2008 brokered by Saudi Arabia, is not possible now in light of the current circumstances.
Denouncing al-Mustaqbal movement's rejection for dialogue, Jumblat urged political powers to gather for talks to distance Lebanon from conflicts, adding “in order to topple the government and form a new one, parties should agree to unconditional dialogue,” he said.
“Parties concerned for Lebanon's stability should back Suleiman's role to preserve civil peace,” he said, stressing the necessity to distance Lebanon from regional conflicts in light of the looming parliamentary elections.
On the Syrian revolution, Jumblat has almost lost the enthusiasm and support he had before, according to the daily. He fears for Syria's unity now and its role in the region as a result of massive destruction sweeping its civilization and culture.
On calls to postpone the 2013 parliamentary elections, Jumblat said “there is no need to postpone the elections if the situation remained stable,” he said.
Joint parliamentary committees have formed an electoral subcommittee to study the disputed issues concerning the electoral draft law despite sharp difference among the political foes over the matter.
On the other hand, Jumblat voiced concerns over the economic situation in Lebanon, stressing that the risks are comparable to the risk of civil peace. The time of economic boom has gone and we need a policy of austerity. Lebanon needs to save itself, he concluded.
Preventing an economic explosion is the responsibility of all political forces, said Jumblat, but he invited Hizbullah to contribute to saving Lebanon.
Walid Jumblat lays it all out ... brilliantly. His portrayal of the Lebanese situation is spot on. His anxiety over the deterioration of the economy is well founded.
At this point Lebanon's best strategy is to coalesce around the existing government and then have the elections in 2013. Stability can only help tourism, exports and confidence.
To see the future one only need look at Greece or Spain ... These countries aren't the exceptions to the rule they are the fore runners of the coming world crisis.
Lebanon can either face the coming crises with a stable government or in chaos. The contraction of Lebanon's economy will only mean severe pressure put on old issues that will give fodder to crippling violence.
I read the arabic version of this article and it seems that nahernet english version has left out some intricate details.
The economic situation is a ticking time bomb specially that we will not be seeing the influx of gulf tourists in the near future.
Lebanon is a country that is destined to be on the bubble. Instead of celebrating our diversity, we tend to use it as a trigger for trouble and destrction.
according to other comments of jumblat starting to come out today: the price of hizbushaitan disarming is a new taef accord.
so this is what they are looking for :)
they want more power in the country.
who is going to give it to them? no one.
this means a new civil war.
collapse of assad does not mean hizballah's arms will be confiscated. that's true...but at least it will be "classified"..meaning organized geographically at least ,including the palestinian camp's arms....including also political arena....including urself and the generals of democracy and their families...dont worry its coming.
This is jumblatt buying time w inta sade until the regime in syria falls. This same jumblat woul go kiss FSA hands one day and HA will ask for forgiveness from the syrian people. Mark my words