Assad Offers Talks with Opposition, Refuses to Quit
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةSyrian President Bashar Assad said he is ready to negotiate with the country's opposition but refuses to consider stepping down, in a rare interview with a UK newspaper.
Assad offered to hold talks with rebels in a bid to end the crisis on the condition they lay down their arms, but made the distinction between the "political entities" he would talk with and "armed terrorists".
"We are ready to negotiate with anyone, including militants who surrender their arms," Assad told The Sunday Times in a video-taped interview conducted last week in his Damascus residence, the Al-Muhajireen palace.
"We can engage in dialogue with the opposition, but we cannot engage in dialogue with terrorists."
His offer of talks echoed that of Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem in Moscow last week -- the first such move by a top Syrian official.
Syria is locked in a 23-month-long conflict in which the United Nations estimates more than 70,000 have been killed but Assad dismissed the idea that the fighting is linked to his continued role as president.
"If this argument is correct, then my departure will stop the fighting," Assad said. "Clearly this is absurd, and other recent precedents in Libya, Yemen and Egypt bear witness to this."
Assad accused the British government of wanting to arm "terrorists" in his country.
"How can we expect them to make the violence less while they want to send military supplies to the terrorists and don't try to ease the dialogue between the Syrians?"
Britain has been pushing for the lifting of a European ban on arms supplies to Syrian rebels but at a meeting last month European Union foreign ministers decided instead to allow only "non-lethal" aid and "technical assistance" to flow to the Syria's opposition.
Assad added that "Britain has played a famously unconstructive role in different issues for decades, some say for centuries -- I'm telling you the perception in our region.
"The problem with this government is that their shallow and immature rhetoric only highlights this tradition of a bullying hegemony."
The British government is currently bound by an EU arms embargo which European foreign ministers decided not to lift at a meeting in Brussels on February 18.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague had called for changes to the existing arms ban "so that we can provide a broader range of support to the National Coalition", the opposition umbrella group in Syria.
"We give them strong political and diplomatic support. We also give them assistance in terms of equipment at the moment to help them try to save people's lives," he added. "I think there is a broader range of equipment that we could give to them."
Assad in his interview dismissed the suggestion that Britain could play a constructive role in resolving the fighting, saying: "We don't expect an arsonist to be a firefighter."
He said that for a long time there had been no contact between the Syria regime and the British government, which lacked credibility in its dealings with Syria because of its history in the Middle East.
"If you want to talk about the role, you cannot separate the role from the credibility," Assad said.
"And we cannot separate the credibility from the history of that country."
Assad accused Britain of wanting to escalate the conflict through its desire to supply military equipment to the rebels.
"How can we expect to ask Britain to play a role while it is determined to militarize the problem?" Assad said.
"I think they are working against us and they are working against the interests of the UK itself.
"This government is acting in a naive, confused and unrealistic manner. If they want to play a role they have to change this, they have to act in a more reasonable and more responsible way."
Separately, Assad did not rule out retaliation for an Israeli air raid near Damascus in January.
"Retaliation does not mean missile for missile or bullet for bullet. Our own way does not have to be announced," Assad said.
Israel, which fears the transfer of Syrian weapons to Lebanon's Hizbullah, implicitly confirmed that it carried out an air raid near Damascus on January 30.
The raid targeted surface-to-air missiles and an adjacent military complex believed to house chemical agents, according to a U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Mortar rounds believed to be have been fired from Syria hit the southern Israeli-occupied Golan Heights on Saturday without causing damage or casualties, the Israeli army said.
In recent months, there have been several instances of gunfire or mortar shells hitting the Israeli side of the plateau. In November, troops responded with artillery in the first such instance of Israeli fire at the Syrian military since the 1973 war.
Israel seized the Golan from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War and annexed it in 1981, in a move never recognized by the international community.
It is currently upgrading its security fence along its armistice line with the work expected to be finished by the end of the year.
If Assad really believes that after all that has happened he can remain as Syria's president then he really is delusional to say the least. If by a miracle he were to stay then it would most certainly be over a much smaller version of what once was Syria.
Iran is actively engaged in preparing for this enclave. Let's hope those plans never come to fruition for it will be disastrous for our region and especially for Lebanon. The corridor they aim to establish runs through deep Sunni areas and securing it will be a nightmare for us Lebanese.
No intelligent logic coming out from this man head. Criticizing the support to the rebels when he is getting ten fold the support from Russian, Iran and its Khizbullah. No logic either why he should still stay president.
The only logic is that of tyrants Iran/Syrian regimes trying to survive. These regimes cannot last for ever. It's a question of time
This guy is too arrogant and too stupid. I have no love for the rebels either. My sympathy is for the citizens who have no part of all this and are made to chose sides.
elections, elections, democracy ,democracy....
means decision for the people
he who refuse elections in syria or lebanon are the real terrorists
Assad's real fault lies in his status as a semi-god by his fellow Alewites who continue to follow orders blindly.
The biggest danger to Israel is a progressive, literate and sophisticated Arab society. This is why the policy followed by the west to support that end is to back dictators at times until they grow independent then they prop up the religious extremists and zealots to bring them down. Then they reverse the order and bring dictators back to being down the religious zealots once they become danger to Israel. And through each cycle the exodus of well educated and moderates continues. Hence over the last 5 or 6 decades you see the down spiral the Arab countries are experiencing. What are we doing to reverse that trend, nothing .... instead we bicker who is worse.