Opposition Hails French, UK Move to Arm Rebels as Regime Says it Violates International Law

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

France and Britain are seeking to lift an EU embargo to enable them to arm Syrian rebels, arguing that Moscow's supply of weapons to Damascus is giving the regime an unfair edge, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said Thursday.

His comments were welcomed by the Syrian opposition as a step in the right direction, but condemned by the regime of President Bashar Assad which said arming the rebels was "a flagrant violation" of international law.

The European Union is sharply divided over the issue, with some fearing that sending more weapons to Syria could further escalate a brutal two-year conflict that has left about 70,000 people dead according to U.N. figures.

Fabius said Paris and London plan to call for the next EU meeting on the weapons ban, currently planned for the end of May, to be held sooner.

"The position that we have taken with President Francois Hollande is to ask (the European Union) to lift the embargo on arms (to the rebels)" he said.

Fabius said Paris could decide to arm the rebels even if the 27-member body does not give unanimous agreement, underscoring that France "is a sovereign nation" and hinting at independent action.

The EU last month amended its embargo to allow member nations to supply "non-lethal" equipment and training to the opposition but stopped short of lifting the ban entirely.

Prime Minister David Cameron said Tuesday that Britain would consider sidestepping the EU arms ban and supply weapons to Syrian rebels if it would help topple Assad.

"I hope that we can persuade our European partners if and when it becomes necessary (to provide weapons) they'll agree with us," he said. "But if we can't, then it's not out of the question we might have to do things in our own way. It's possible.

"We are still an independent country, we can have an independent foreign policy."

Fabius told France Info radio that France and Britain will ask "the Europeans now to lift the embargo so that the resistance fighters have the possibility of defending themselves."

"We cannot accept the current disequilibrium with Iran and Russia supplying arms to Assad on the one hand and the opposition unable to defend itself on the other," he said.

French officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Paris was considering providing the rebels with ground-to-air missiles to retaliate against air strikes by government troops.

"Lifting the embargo is the only means of moving things on a political level," Fabius said, hinting at pressure on the Damascus regime and Moscow.

Syria's main opposition National Coalition welcomed the announcement.

"We consider it a step in the right direction... Assad will not accept a political solution until he realizes he is faced with an (armed) force that will defeat him," spokesman Walid al-Bunni told Agence France Presse.

Syria's state news agency SANA said Paris and London's intention to provide weapons to "terrorist groups" was in "flagrant violation" of the principles of international law.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of Russia -- the regime's biggest arms supplier -- had made similar comments on Wednesday.

But Fabius said one could not take recourse to legal arguments to say that "'we can supply arms to Assad but will not allow resistance fighters to defend themselves'."

Western powers have stepped up aid for the rebels, with Britain currently giving "non-lethal" support, but Germany has warned that delivering weapons to the opposition could lead to a dangerous arms race in the region.

The next EU meeting to study the embargo is planned for the end of May, but Fabius said Paris and London want to hold the meeting sooner and did not rule out a gathering before the end of March.

"We must move quickly," he said, adding: "We along with the British will ask for the meeting to be moved up."

More than 70,000 people have died in the Syrian conflict, according to the United Nations, while the number of refugees fleeing to neighboring countries has reached one million.

Comments 18
Default-user-icon SamSaaaaam (Guest) 14 March 2013, 10:33

Efficient lethal weapons is a no no. This is just a diplomatic smoke screen. They want to split opposition and give further advantage to Assad- Israel coalition. I got no sympathy for al Nusra but division especially NOW will ultimately hurt any chance for opposition to make further gains.

Thumb mouallek 14 March 2013, 16:58

And you have made a deal with stupidity.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 14 March 2013, 12:10

how convenient you mention that "Assad has mentioned the blood-thirsty history of this empire" but you make no mention of HIS and his family's blood-thirsty history.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 14 March 2013, 12:10

hahahaha 7aboob the russian bear is in hibernation...

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 14 March 2013, 15:18

making lots of money? sure, the corrupt government and private businessmen are making lots of money, while the people starve. the russians know they do not have the technological edge over the west in terms of weapons and that their outdated weapons will be smashed. Russia while resource rich have squandered the opportunity to pull itself level with the west. I will admit one thing, the only edge they have is in their air defense systems... the best in the world i think. but that is defensive.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 14 March 2013, 12:12

odds are and i agree that this is all talk... UK and France know the repercussion of arming the rebels when there are extremist elements within them.. but on the other hand, if it does happen, this war will be over soon after.

Default-user-icon Joseph (Guest) 14 March 2013, 12:59

Is the French army strong enough to fight the Islamist Terrorists simultaneously in Mali and the Quai d'Orsay?

Thumb mckinl 14 March 2013, 13:30

Since England and France are so committed to further mayhem then they should give just as much to taking care of the Syrians they displace and have displaced.Same deal for the GCC. You, the GCC have armed these rebels you also owe the refugees compensation for their misery and losses.

Countries that destabilize other countries must be held accountable for the pain and suffering that their policies create. Countries that are victims should be able to sue the perpetrators in the International Court of Justice.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 14 March 2013, 15:14

but who will hold Assad accountable?

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 14 March 2013, 17:13

long overdue! even if it is just a bluff.

Missing peace 14 March 2013, 17:17

lol! as if the syrian regime didn t violate any international laws!!! first one being shelling its own citizens with military weapons as if they were enemies....

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 14 March 2013, 17:29

The saddest part of all this is the support some lebanese give the same regime that did the same to Lebanon.

Missing peace 14 March 2013, 19:07

stupidity and ignorance at its best....

Thumb beecause 14 March 2013, 19:16

waw! your intelligence contaminated us including me!!!

Missing formerlebaniz 14 March 2013, 22:02

They should change this country's name from Lebanon to Hypocrisia or Hypocranon.
1st Hypocrisy, you guys been claiming the west been supplying Weapons to the Rebels since day one, now they are talking about supplying them you are going nuts.
2nd Hypocrisy, An airsupply line NONSTOP going from Iran/Russia to Syria supplying your beloved leader with weapons and ammunition, but god forbid anyone else supplies his opposition with weapons.
3rd Hypocrisy, While you think it's the right of Assad to mass murder his people and the opposition to simply die, you neglect to remember they also have the right to defend them selves and providing them with the means to do so is in your eyes illegal.

Fascinating creatures you are.

Missing peace 14 March 2013, 22:48

and u FPMers the most hypocrit people in lebanon praising this regime who tortured many christians... you are just not lebanese and don t deserve the nationality...

Missing peace 14 March 2013, 22:58

those who ally with a party they labeled as terrorist for years and defend a regime they always treated as terrorist too only deserve contempt because they have no dignity whatsoever and are insulting the memories of the aounis tortured or killed by their present allies.....

Missing lebcan 15 March 2013, 08:43

OK asaf sure BUT Russia, China and Iran TOO you Hypocrite.