Eight Syrian Alawites Abducted from Minibus in Wadi Khaled

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Eight Syrian Alawites were kidnapped on Monday from their minibus in the Lebanese border area of Wadi Khaled while en route to Syria, Lebanon's National News Agency reported.

They were abducted by the members of two families who hail from Wadi Khaled in retaliation for the disappearance of their relative who went missing in Syria more than a year ago, NNA said.

Wadi Khaled residents abducted eight Alawite workers after stopping a minibus carrying 14 Syrian nationals at the Jisr Qmar border crossing in the Wadi Khaled area of al-Bqaiaa, the agency said.

It identified the abductees as Mohsen al-Ali, Hazem al-Hasan, Salman al-Ali, Tamim al-Hasan, Nassim Khabouri, Muslim Gharib, Abdo Gharib and Yamen Khabouri.

The Lebanese army sent its troops to search for the hostages, the agency added.

Earlier on Monday, LBCI television said “the family of Fheid al-Ahmed abducted eight Syrian Alawite workers from a minbus in Wadi Khaled to swap them for their son who is being held in Syria.”

Meanwhile, Al-Jazeera put the number of Syrian abductees at five, noting that they belong to the same family.

It said al-Ahmed telephoned his family on Sunday to inform them that he is being held by Syrian security services.

For its part, LBCI said the clans and mayors of Wadi Khaled held a meeting to discuss releasing the hostages and avoiding a possible escalation.

Meanwhile, a security official told Agence France Presse that unknown attackers kidnapped nine Syrian Alawites after they crossed into Lebanon by bus.

The assailants seized the group "shortly after their bus crossed the Syrian-Lebanese border via the Jisr Qmar crossing into the Wadi Khaled area of north Lebanon," the official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

"Women and children were among the group," the official added, without giving any further details.

Later on Monday, al-Hisheh Municipality chief Dahham al-Nayef said “the Syrians held in the town by al-Ahmed family are guests, not hostages.”

He said the motive behind the abduction was “the belief of Hussein Fahd al-Ahmed's family that the relatives of some of the Syrian abductees played a certain role in the abduction of their son Mohammed Hussein Fahd al-Ahmed more than a year ago.”

According to al-Nayef, al-Ahmed was handed over to Syrian authorities after a blackmail attempt.

The municipal chief revealed that efforts were underway to resolve the issue, calling on the Lebanese state to “play its role and mediate with the Syrian authorities to release al-Ahmed.”

He said most of the Syrian abductees hail from the Homs neighborhood of al-Nazha.

Two years into a spiraling war in neighboring Syria, sectarian tensions have flared up in Lebanon.

Frequent sectarian clashes have raged in the flashpoint city of Tripoli, where Alawite fighters have battled armed members of the Sunni community.

Last week, a wave of tit-for-tat kidnappings hit the Bekaa region, pitting Shiites from the Jaafar clan and Sunnis from the town of Arsal.

Comments 9
Thumb benzona 01 April 2013, 22:12

Agreed, but our army isn't allowed to check ALL areas in Lebanon. Hence, retour à la case Départ.

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 02 April 2013, 00:09

FT- what makes you so certain that the FSA will invade Lebanon afterwards? You speak with such certainty, I am curious as to how you came to that information. If it’s your opinion then I strongly disagree and here is why.
Do you really think people (everyone from the north to the south, east to the west) forgot what it was like to have Syria in Lebanon? On the contrary, the FSA will get no support if they decide to invade Lebanon (aside from a few people cheering for them here who are not involved in politics). The only thing they will do is cut off the supply line to HA and that my friend is the best and only thing they can, should and will do.
That’s my opinion of what is looming on the horizon.

Thumb LEBhasNOhope 02 April 2013, 17:07

sorry FT but what you are saying is a scare tactic to give support to bashar. FSA will not enter Lebanon. By the time the war will end in syria, there will be north of 100,000 people killed several million people displaced. A country in ruins that needs to be rebuilt. A government that needs to be formed. Once basahar is hanged, the FSA wouldn’t give a crap about HA or Lebanon for that matter. It will actually take several years before they can get their act together enough to secure the border with Lebanon. That is when HA clock will start ticking on when to turn in their weapons and what they can get in return for them (in a sectarian way of course) power wise in Lebanon. Mark my words and call me a liar later on if this scenario does not fold out verbatim.

Missing peace 02 April 2013, 18:45

it is more likely thet FPM will side with hezbis when they will feel cornered and then launch a war against lebanese who will want them to disarm... hezbis and FPM are just fighting for their interests even if it means sinking lebanon in another war to keep their beloved weapons...

Default-user-icon Sae Kubo in Tokyo (Guest) 02 April 2013, 05:07

I sippose, during the political vacuum before the election organised, the discussion based on the Baabda declaration -it must be! - will be continued between rival coalitions. By reading the escalation of the civil war in syria and the need of the foreign aid and help for syrian children, if just because Syrian are alwaite, eight syrian on a bus were killed by unknown attackers, it must be considered such terrifying to threten syrians as criminal action.

Missing helicopter 02 April 2013, 05:43

Agreed mfawaz .......... we need to lead by exxample. We should not operate in the same mode our opponents do. We need to be the change we are seeking. Moqawam before Hezb did as much damage to Lebanon as today's Moqawama, both weakened the State and the Army and the end result will be civil war just like the first moqawama resulted in.

Missing helicopter 02 April 2013, 05:48

In that case mfawaz, I withdraw my support of your previous comment. I do not believe in the existence of a Resistance in the presence of the State. It was fine to have it before 2005, but since then it has done nothing but divide the country and weakened the State.

Missing mohammad_ca 02 April 2013, 14:54

where are these tribes that you speak of and, if they exist, how representative are they of "Saudis and Yemenis". On the other side, look at societies that sanction abortions and, in specific, sex selective abortions.

Missing peace 02 April 2013, 18:48

yes hezbi are indirectly allied with israel as both cannot accept a strong lebanon! they both need a divided lebanon to better rule it... hezbi needs a weak lebanon to keep its arms and do whatever they want without any fear! and israel to thrive economically without a competitor in the region!

so yes hezbis are allied with israel on that matter!!! but blind FPMers don t see that, they only see their little interests....