Bkirki: No LF, FPM Meeting Has Been Scheduled due to High Tensions

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi's envoy Bishop Samir Mazloum lamented the eruption of the dispute between the Christian Free Patriotic Movement and Lebanese Forces over the parliamentary electoral law, urging calm to resolve their differences, reported al-Joumhouria newspaper Saturday.

He told the daily: “A meeting between the two sides has not been scheduled due to the high tensions between them.”

The dispute erupted between the two parties after the FPM accused the LF of abandoning the Orthodox Gathering parliamentary electoral law, which it had previously agreed to at the joint parliamentary committees along with the FPM, Marada Movement, and Phalange Party.

The LF had justified its decision to refrain from endorsing the proposal during a recent parliamentary session, aimed at voting on the draft law, to the inability to implement the suggestion.

LF chief Samir Geagea had said that it became clear to the party over time that the draft law would be impossible to implement due to the opposition to it by President Michel Suleiman, caretaker Premier Najib Miqati, MP Walid Jumblat's National Struggle Front, and independent Christian March 14 lawmakers.

The FPM has meanwhile held the LF responsible for parliament's failure to approve the law, with caretaker Energy Minister Jebran Bassil saying Thursday that the LF placed “personal interests above public ones by choosing March 14 camp instead of the country and by choosing Mustaqbal bloc over Christians.”

At the moment of truth, they (the LF and Mustaqbal) announced another law and wasted the chance to offer Christians fair representation, he commented.

“We lost Christian unity. We temporarily lost 64 seats, and we lost a real chance to organize the Christian arena and end the dispersion caused by some parasites and feudal lords,” he said.

The LF, Mustaqbal, and National Struggle Front announced on Tuesday an agreement over a hybrid proposal that calls for 54 MPs to be elected under the winner-takes-all system and 46 percent via the proportional representation system.

The Phalange Party, of the March 14 alliance, did not endorse the law.

The Orthodox Gathering law considers Lebanon a single district and stipulates that each sect elects its own MPs under on a proportional representation system, is strongly backed by Hizbullah and the FPM.

Mazloum meanwhile told al-Joumhouria that the proposal endorsed by the LF, Mustaqbal, and National Struggle Front grants Christians no more than 50 MPs.

He revealed that Bkirki was surprised by the agreement, criticizing the LF for failing to consult it and other Christian parties over its decision.

He also criticized the FPM for “overreacting” to the LF's position, saying that the party was subject to “vulgar accusations of treason.”

Moreover, Mazloum said that Bkirki itself had agreed months ago to suspend the agreement over the Orthodox Gathering proposal after it realized that it would not be adopted given the opposition to it.

This was followed by a period of consultations held between the LF and its allies and the LF and the FPM under the watchful eye of Bkirki, he added.

The consultations however came to a halt with the LF's agreement with the Mustaqbal and National Struggle Front over the hybrid law, he said.

Comments 9
Missing -karim_m1 18 May 2013, 10:23

"Mazloum said that the proposal endorsed by the LF, Mustaqbal, and National Struggle Front grants Christians no more than 50 MPs. He criticized the LF for failing to consult it and other Christian parties over its decision."

There's no doubt now that Bkirki is strongly opposed to the February 14 Saudi-Wahabi coalition and the LF puppets. Saying an electoral law grants Christians no more than 50 MPs is pretty much dropping a hammer on Saudi Arabian terrorism.

The February 14 Saudi-Wahabi Christian imposters are in deep trouble in the upcoming election. They no longer have a pro-Arabist/Wahabist Batrak to hide behind (actually the complete opposite), the elections will be closely monitored for illegal funding (Saudi-Wahabi terrorist petrodollars), and you have gems like "Fal ya7kom al ikhwan" while Christian bishops are being kidnapped. Even the Phalangists are starting to wake up and realize that they've sold the Christians to the Saudis for far too long. It's about time.

Thumb Chupachups 18 May 2013, 10:52

Hello

Thumb Chupachups 18 May 2013, 10:55

if u have any suggestions as to which faces you would like to see on my avatar, request it. And i will put it.

Thumb Chupachups 18 May 2013, 17:23

Dandoun left me :(...... But I will put her pic on just for u

Thumb geha 18 May 2013, 15:44

the1phoenix
this comment of yours is for the least not fair:
- please advise which Christian leader you would propose instead of the existing ones?
- We Christians do not accept to be led by just one leader blindly, unlike sunnis and shia. this is against our nature as we like to think for ourselves.
- kindly advise your preference between a leader that wants the state to prevail, and a leader that is allied to an Iranian entity that works daily on dismantling the state?
there are so many things going on under the hood, and being superficial as you have been in your comment is misleading.
believe me when I say that there are such bad plans being prepared for us that what you saw these days is just smoke.

Thumb geha 18 May 2013, 15:48

please do bear in mind that I do not route for Geagea, but I do consider him more representative of what we as Christians need currently to exist in this country.

Missing cowboymicho 18 May 2013, 17:16

Sorry I don't agree Geha. Geagea is only partnered up with Hariri because he's getting bankrolled. He's not doing it for leb. I think what needs to happen in Lebanon is an all out, winner take all war. Christians/Israelis/Europeans/US vs Saudi/Iran/Syria. Hmmm, I wonder who would win?!?!?! Loser leaves or at least becomes the peasant. Winner rules. Maybe by the graces of God and the prophet Mohammad pbuh just like the battle of Badr the super power will be defeated by having rocks thrown and fighter jets. Lol. Lol lol

Missing cowboymicho 18 May 2013, 17:08

I can't believe how stupid these two men are. They didn't learn from their mistakes of the civil war when they fought against each other instead coming together as one. Had they done that, the Christians would be the single power house in Lebanon today instead of the hizballah. The dream of Lebanon died when Sheikh Bachir Gemayel died. All these other so called leader of all the political parties in Lebanon are just plain out thieves. The Christians need to come together instead of staying divided. We need another Bachir but sad enough, the world will never see another like him.

Missing peace 18 May 2013, 19:27

they should make a law dissolving ALL the parties that took part in the civil war and forbid ALL the leaders that were actively part of the war too!!
lebanon is still living in the past and the civil war is still going on in the heads of those incompetent fools called lebanese politicians...