Phalange Party Calls for Tightening Security Measures on Border with Syria

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Phalange Party on Monday condemned the continuous Syrian violations of Lebanon's sovereignty, calling on concerned authorities to tighten security measure on the border with the neighboring country.

"Security measures are very important in al-Masnah, al-Abboudiyeh, and al-Arida border crossings,” the conferees said in a released statement after the political bureau's weekly meeting.

They added: “The identities of the people arriving to Lebanon must be checked to prevent groups belonging to suspicious cells from entering the country.”

The political bureau called for not allowing in any foreigners "with no valid and official documents with detailed information regarding their residence in Lebanon."

“We also urge concerned authorities to go after suspicious cells in the country that work on inciting sedition through placing bombs in different regions.”

The politburo pointed out to the accumulating problems in the country "with parliamentary and governmental dimensions," calling for solving the political problems obstructing the cabinet's formation.

“Forming a strong cabinet is the necessary passageway to fixing these problems.”

The politburo praised President Michel Suleiman's speech on Army Day, considering it a roadmap for Lebanon's “salvation.”

"We demand that the Baabda Declaration becomes a basis for any new cabinet's policy statement, whatever was its form or size,” it said.

"We also reject the use of rockets as a response to such patriotic stances."

"This is a national failure and political impotence.”

During a speech he gave at a ceremony marking Lebanon's 68th Army Day, Suleiman lashed out at the military interventions in Syria, without naming any sides, saying the blood of Lebanese should not be sacrificed to serve the interests of other countries.

He called for a review of the national defense strategy, while stressing the state should enjoy a monopoly over the use of military force to defend Lebanon’s sovereignty.

Comments 7
Thumb bipartisan 05 August 2013, 18:19

yeah just like Amine gemayel did for 6 years of presidency. When are gonna learn to deal directly with the core rather than paying tactics. If Bashar loose we will have all the M8 asking for what M14 are asking today, if he win the other way around. the truth is that after 50 years of middle eastern war the calculus is still the same we need the arab to survive economically yet we want to keep them at the door because as minorities we fear them. At some stage we have to decide wether we want diversity and wealth or we want to preserve the homogeneity of our races

Missing helicopter 05 August 2013, 23:34

We want diversity and wealth, but is this what the Arabs are offering? They are offering Islamic this vs Nusra that vs HA this vs Jund Elsham that and so on.

Thumb lebanon_first 05 August 2013, 21:23

Dans un monde d'aveugles les borgnes sont rois....
Who gave orders to Amine? I see Geagea taking orders, hariri, Nasrallah,.... but amine?

Default-user-icon i-4n-i (Guest) 05 August 2013, 23:42

you are right, I think amine had to lead the country in the toughest times ever, I remember his words " you will miss my reigning days" , amine has no more to lose, so he is all in , wouldn't take orders from anyone, aren't the gemayels all like that? wasn't stubbornness and believing in himself what got bashir killed ?

Missing helicopter 05 August 2013, 23:32

No this is NOT what HA was doing. HA was one of the biggest offenders of what is said in this article.
Also as added bonus
The politburo praised President Michel Suleiman's speech on Army Day, considering it a roadmap for Lebanon's “salvation.” ..........
Definitely this is NOT what HA would say.
And finally
God save Lebanon from HA with help from the army.

Missing helicopter 05 August 2013, 23:36

Same with Dany and Dori Chamoun........ the charismatic and strong ones get eliminnated (up to the most recent Rafic, Gibran, Pierre, and many others).

Missing VINCENT 06 August 2013, 02:28

The resistance and the army can't be separate institutions.