Syrian Forces Bomb Area of Alleged Chemical Attack

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Syrian government forces pressed on with a military offensive in eastern Damascus on Thursday, bombing rebel-held suburbs where the opposition said the regime had killed over 100 people the day before in a chemical weapons attack.

The government has denied allegations it used chemical weapons in artillery barrages on the area known as eastern Ghouta on Wednesday as "absolutely baseless."

The United States, Britain and France have demanded that a team of U.N. experts already in Syria be granted immediate access to investigate the site.

Syrian opposition figures and activists have reported widely varying death tolls from Wednesday's attack, from 136 to as high as 1,300. But even the most conservative tally would make it the deadliest alleged chemical attack in Syria's civil war.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it had no word on casualties in the Thursday morning bombing of eastern Ghouta. It said Syrian warplanes conducted several air raids on eastern and western suburbs of Damascus, including three that took place within five minutes.

The Local Coordination Committees, another activist group, said President Bashar Assad's forces were bombing eastern Ghouta from the Qasioun mountain overlooking Damascus. It also reported several air raids on the suburbs.

Wednesday's alleged chemical attack had killed scores of children. The small, lifeless bodies appeared in amateur videos, wrapped in white cloths, their pale skin unmarked by any wounds.

Images of dead children lined shoulder to shoulder in rooms and of others being treated for breathing problems brought worldwide condemnation and shock.

Mohammed Abdullah, an activist in the suburb of Saqba told The Associated Press via Skype on Thursday that most of the dead were buried hours after the attack in collective graves in different areas in eastern Ghouta. The burials took place quickly for fear the bodies might decompose as a result of the heat and lack of electricity, he said.

Relatives identified some of their dead family members before burial while unidentified victims were photographed and their graves tagged with a number in case their loved ones come to collect their bodies in the future.

"Most of the dead were buried in mass graves," Abdullah said.

UNICEF said in a statement that the reports of attacks on civilians, presumably including children, were "deeply disturbing."

"Such horrific acts should be a reminder to all the parties and all who have influence on them that this terrible conflict has gone on far too long and children have suffered more than enough," UNICEF said. "Children must be protected, and those who fail to protect them will be held accountable."

From New York, the U.N. Security Council called for "a thorough, impartial and prompt investigation" of the latest allegation of chemical weapons' use in Syria.

Syria's state media quoted on Thursday an unnamed Foreign Ministry official, according to its standard practice, as saying that allowing the U.N. team to go to Ghouta would require an agreement between the Syrian government and the United Nations.

A 20-member U.N. team led by Swedish chemical weapons expert Ake Sellstrom is in Damascus since Sunday to investigate three sites where chemical weapons attacks allegedly occurred in the past: the village of Khan al-Assal just west of the embattled northern city of Aleppo and two other locations being kept secret for security reasons.

France, meanwhile, raised the possibility of the use of force in Syria if it is proven that Assad's regime used chemical weapons, while Turkey said several red lines have been crossed.

"We need a reaction by the international community .... a reaction of force," said French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. He excluded boots on the ground as an option, though, and declined to be "more precise" on the type of force that could be used.

Yuval Steinitz, Israel's minister for intelligence and strategic affairs, said their "intelligence estimates" concluded that chemical weapons indeed were used, and appeared to blame Assad, calling his regime "exceptionally cruel."

In Germany, Turkish and German foreign ministers underlined demands for the Syrian regime to allow U.N. inspectors to investigate the claims. The Turkish diplomat called for new sanctions.

"Several red lines have been crossed — if sanctions are not imposed immediately, then we will lose our power to deter," said Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

He added that he had spoken to U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon and told him that "the U.N. must not behave hesitantly anymore, sanctions must now be imposed."

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said the Syrian opposition's allegations were "so serious, so monstrous that it is necessary to enable a real examination before talking or speculating about consequences."

The unrest in Syria began in March 2011 and later exploded into a civil war. More than 100,000 people have been killed in the conflict so far, according to U.N. figures.

Comments 23
Missing rudy 22 August 2013, 15:44

how convenient. covering something?

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 August 2013, 18:38

the combat hadent stopped there in weeks before the chemicals were used, it didnt stop yesterday neither did it stop today. no amount of combat can make the traces of such a massive chemical attack disappear, the soil must be drenched with it, the walls of the buildings, the blood of the victims, the bodies... traces will no go because a few shells fell here and there.

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 August 2013, 18:44

the most basic logic would indicate that it was done by one of qaeda's group in syria.
first we all know they never gave a damn about innocent lives as shown in their terrorist attacks where they'd deliberately blow up scores of civilians without hesitation
and second the syrian army had neither the need for, nor any interest in such an attack. the only outcome of this massacre is to try to incriminate the regular troops.
little reminder, the britam email leak:
http://www.cyberwarnews.info/reports/a-look-into-the-britam-defence-data-leak-files/

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 August 2013, 18:44

Phil

We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?

Kind regards

David

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 August 2013, 19:24

i cannot always explain everything anonyme, as i told you yesterday i see facts and try to analyze from there and make my opinion.

here i'm sorry to say it, but there are no facts. did the UN team ask to go there or are you assuming they did? did the regime deny or delay or are you assuming they did?
maybe the inspectors themselves are still assessing whether or not it is possible/safe to go on-site, maybe the council needs to issue some sort of order (i doubt they can just go around and wander)...

and about sending rescue teams are you serious? the nusra boys have been slaughtering all government employees and sniping them where they can, just a couple of days ago i saw that: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0d9_1377040297
those were probably workers trying to restore electricity to a neighborhood, but it makes no difference to these animals, they just shoot

Default-user-icon Enough (Guest) 22 August 2013, 16:09

@Rudy: definitely.
@anonymetexasusa: bravo. Exactly what happened in Houla 24 hours after the arrival of the "Observers" mission in 2012...
Syrian Regime is the champion of cover up. Remember how fast they cleaned the area when they killed Mughniyeh...

Missing thesyrian 22 August 2013, 16:55

Hmmm Your Wishful thinking: "Living to see the end of bashar..." The thing Bashar will live throughout millions of Syrian who managed for the last 50 years to bring Syria out of Back-warded Gulf-Style cannibal-Eating culture. Bashar might die, you might die but Baath never dies. Peace!

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 August 2013, 18:34

anonyme: a handful? they are tens of thousands, they already took over the FSA and are most likely behind this attack. they have the most extreme sort of views and literally terrorize the population under pretext of coming to save them from dictatorship. of course they are more dangerous

Thumb _mowaten_ 22 August 2013, 18:46

yes, so those who support the rebels are responsible for terrorism, executions and mass murder

Thumb Maxx 22 August 2013, 21:36

...And those who support the Iranian Occupation Forces and Baschar's barkers support mass-murder, plural executions, collective terrorism, child-sniping, and the butchering of grannies and infants with machetes (a là Qusayr). You've got the wrong flag for your avatar ya "mowaten".

Thumb cedre 22 August 2013, 19:40

He gazed yesterday the area, now he is bombing it and 4th mechanized brigade wii try to assault east ghouta...

Missing samiam 22 August 2013, 20:08

if there is nothing to hide, what are the ASSad supporters afraid of?

Default-user-icon :) :) (Guest) 22 August 2013, 20:49

ROFLMAO " bombs created a space-time singularity making the gas time travel and affect people one day before " . dude I like that one, u watch " doctor who " ? haha a good one

Thumb Maxx 22 August 2013, 21:02

There are your "Takfiri terrorists" right there in that photo ya Hasan. What a brave man you must be to be so "terrorized" of them. Who needs Qana when you have Ghouta?

Thumb jabal10452 23 August 2013, 10:27

Qana was thoroughly investigated by the UN, Human Right Watch and Amnesty International . The reports squarely placed the responsibility on the Israel, as well as acknowledging that HA had a mortar position within the 200 m perimeter of the Fijian UN base where civilians were sheltering. Here's what the UN report said:
(f) Contrary to repeated denials, two Israeli helicopters and a remotely piloted vehicle were present in the Qana area at the time of the shelling. While the possibility cannot be ruled out completely, it is unlikely that the shelling of the United Nations compound was the result of gross technical and/or procedural errors.

Thumb Maxx 22 August 2013, 21:07

I'm with Tex on this. Give the area two, three days - maximum a week - of ventilation, and those molecules would have become so dispersed that the evidence would not stand in a court of law. By keeping up the bombardment on the area he (Baschar) can keep up the pretence that he is denying UN inspectors access to the area because "it is unsafe" (because surely Baschar cares a lot). If the government did launch that CW attack, it would be in the rebels' interest that the fighting lulls and the inspectors come over and do their job: inspect. But who is keeping up the bombardment? That's right.

Default-user-icon beid (Guest) 22 August 2013, 21:40

bit hebbo lal beid ?

Thumb beiruti 22 August 2013, 22:37

Now convenient that the regime started bombing the place just as UN inspectors wanted to get in and inspect. The Regime is playing the international community as fools and the international community is complicit in being fools. The complicity is to the point now of enabling atrocities to be committed against the Syrian people with complete international impunity. Shame on the so called "world leaders". This is not leadership, it's lawyership. There is a difference.

Thumb beiruti 23 August 2013, 04:54

Anonymetexas, the Arab League countries will not stage an intervention so as not to seta precedent. The various kings and autocrats of the region wish to reserve their right to commit genocide against their own people too, if necessary for their regimes's survival.

Really, we are going to wait for this bunch to act, or justify our forbearance on this??? Since when has the member states of the Arab League set the international standard for detecting and preventing crimes against humanity??? They are the ones who commit crimes against humanity. Their inaction can provide the West no credible cover for Western inaction. It was the US that set the international standards for human rights. Our abdication during these atrocities leaves no one to hold the standard for those who fall victim to the likes of Middle Eastern regimes.

Thumb jabal10452 22 August 2013, 23:55

I just love the way my comment was removed. I wonders which party was offended this time?

Default-user-icon daron (Guest) 23 August 2013, 01:02

the acceptance of the big powers in using chemical weapons inorder to solve a political problem in their favour will be dangerous example to the other nations who will try to solve their problems in a new chemical era way

Default-user-icon John (Guest) 23 August 2013, 01:02

Chemical attack, SAA "accident" ?

Default-user-icon Leo (Guest) 23 August 2013, 07:33

bigjohn....MR. Expert on everything. Just how exactly do you know everything. You get your information from skewed second hand sources and the Internet...which of course, is certifiably FACTUAL! You can now insult me, cause it's all ya got!