Obama Says U.S. Won't Send Troops to Syria, Kerry Says Military Act Sends Deterring Message to Iran, Hizbullah
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةU.S. President Barack Obama said Friday he had taken no "final decision" on striking Syria but that the world could not accept the gassing of women and children, as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Washington knows “where the rockets were launched from."
Calling Syria's alleged use of chemical weapons a threat to U.S. national security, Obama said the response would be "narrow" and "limited."
The U.S. president slammed the "incapacity" of the U.N. Security Council to act on Syria, warning the world must not be "paralyzed" on responding to a chemical weapons attack.
"What we have seen so far at least is an incapacity at this point for the Security Council to move forward in the face of a clear violation of international norms," Obama said, as he met Baltic leaders at the White House.
The president said he recognizes the world and the U.S. are war-weary but stressed that the United States has an obligation "as a leader in the world" to hold countries accountable if they violate international norms.
Obama said he has strong preference for multilateral action, but added that he does not "want the world to be paralyzed."
He also stressed that Washington will not send troops for a ground operation in Syria.
"This kind of attack is a challenge to the world," Obama told reporters at the White House.
"We cannot accept a world where women and children and innocent civilians are gassed on a terrible scale," he said, calling the attack a threat to U.S. "national security interests."
"I have said before, and I meant what I said, that the world has an obligation to make sure we maintain the norm against the use of chemical weapons," he said.
Earlier on Friday, Kerry said the expected U.S. military action against Syria would be a "tailored response" to punish President Bashar Assad's regime whom he accused of staging the reported chemical attack near Damascus, noting that Obama will consult with the Congress regarding any move.
Kerry said Obama "has said very clearly that whatever decision he makes in Syria, it will bear no resemblance to Afghanistan, Iraq or even Libya. It will not involve any boots on the ground. It will not be open ended."
“We know where the rockets were launched from and where they landed,” he added, noting that “when the U.N. inspectors finally gained access, that access was restricted and controlled."
“We need to ask what is the risk of doing nothing. This crime against conscience, this crime against humanity ... matters to us ... It matters if nothing is done,” Kerry said, in a speech that acknowledged that Americans at home and U.S. allies abroad are weary of war.
Kerry cited the accusations of the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, France, Turkey and Australia against the Syrian regime concerning the reported chemical attack.
He added: “We will continue talking to the Congress, talking to our allies and most importantly talking to the American people.”
“History will judge us all if we turn a blind eye to dictators using weapons of mass destruction,” he said.
Kerry stressed that Washington remains “committed to have a diplomatic process that can resolve this (Syrian conflict) through negotiations.”
“The world's most heinous weapons must not be used again against the most vulnerable people,” he stressed.
Kerry said the United Nations cannot tell the world anything about the reported chemical attack that the U.S. “doesn't already know.”
He noted that U.N. investigators probing the attack are limited by a mandate to determine if an attack took place, adding that they won't say who is responsible.
"This is the indiscriminate, inconceivable horror of chemical weapons. This is what Assad did to his own people," Kerry said.
"The question is what are we collectively, what are we in the world, going to do about it?" he added.
The secretary of state warned that international failure to take action against Syria would embolden Iran, Hizbullah and North Korea.
"This matter also goes beyond the limits of Syria's borders," he said, in a statement that left little doubt that U.S. military action against Syria was imminent.
"It's about whether Iran, which itself has been a victim of chemical weapons attacks, will now feel emboldened in the absence of action to obtain nuclear weapons. It's about Hizbullah and every other terrorist group that might contemplate the use of weapons of mass destruction," he added.
Meanwhile, a U.S. intelligence report blamed Syria's government for the reported chemical weapons attack with "high confidence" and said it was "highly unlikely" the outrage was a ruse plotted by rebels.
The report said that 1,429 people were killed in the attack, including 426 children, and said the assessment was based on "multiple" streams of intelligence.
"The United States Government assesses with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs on August 21, 2013," the report, released by the White House said.
"We further assess that the regime used a nerve agent in the attack."
The report went on to detail casualty figures from the attack on a Damascus suburb on August 21, and said they would likely rise as new intelligence comes in.
"A preliminary U.S. government assessment determined that 1,429 people were killed in the chemical weapons attack, including at least 426 children."
The unclassified assessment, which omitted sourcing and raw intelligence to protect U.S. intelligence assets, also debunked the theory, advanced notably by Russia, that opposition forces could have carried out the attack.
"We assess that the scenario in which the opposition executed the attack on August 21 is highly unlikely."
"The body of information used to make this assessment includes intelligence pertaining to the regime's preparations for this attack and its means of delivery, multiple streams of intelligence about the attack itself and its effect, our post-attack observations, and the differences between the capabilities of the regime and the opposition.
"Our high confidence assessment is the strongest position that the U.S. Intelligence Community can take short of confirmation," it added.
Kerry said the U.S. government had repeatedly assessed the intelligence in the report, to avoid the kind of fiasco that erupted over botched covert material used to justify the Iraq war.
"We will not repeat that moment," he said.
Meanwhile, an aide to Francois Hollande said the French president and Obama are both convinced the Syrian regime used chemical weapons on its own people last week.
The two leaders "share the same certainty that the attack was chemical in nature and that the regime was undoubtedly responsible," the aide said after Obama and Hollande held phone talks Friday.
"Francois Hollande repeated France's determination not to leave these crimes unpunished and felt the same determination on Obama's side," the aide said.
The aide said the two leaders spoke for around 45 minutes and had "reviewed the chemical attack and the proof" that it was carried out by Assad's forces.
Hollande said in an interview with Le Monde newspaper due to be published Saturday that his government wants "firm" action against Assad's regime in retaliation for the attack.
France is poised to become the United States' main ally in the Syria crisis after the British parliament rejected involvement in any military strikes.
I guess the Americans have made it clear that they will go ahead with surgical & tailored military action against Syria. In my opinion, as a journalist and correspondent that Syria's response will be very limited and tailored as well. Obama needs to uphold his credibility in the region, while Bashar Al-Assad must respond to keep Geneva two alive.
48 hours at max, Syria will be attacked..
The phone lines are very busy now between Washington & Tehran on how the attack and response will look like.
Hezbollah will not be dragged into this conflict nor Israel..
Hey guys
Based on what I have seen on TV, it looks like new tourists will be visiting Syria any time now . They are "guided' tourists among them Tomahawk, etc...
let's welcome the American guided tourists
Southern
Your friends in Syria will be welcoming some "guided" tourists soon
so what you say bud??
Rhetoric from both sides, whether it is the Americans or the Syrians/Russians & Iranians. The military action against Syria, which i expect within the next 48hrs max, has been pre-negotiated between Feltman & leaders in Tehran. The so-called US targets & response have been agreed upon. Both sides don't favour & want wide-scale regional war now... However, what i see interesting is how a new coaltion was formed in the Middle East which in my opinion has pushed away for maybe a decade or two any war in the region..
in other words- accept the way bashar is killing us lebanese now with car bombs because takfiris are going to be worse? did i get your point correct big john?
OK- I can buy that and fully agree with you that we need to protect ourselves from both sides. However, tell me this. We are 100% sure we cannot protect ourselves from the current regime based on the last 30+ years of painful experience. that is a stone cold fact. show me proof that we will not be able to protect ourselves in the future if a regime change happens, the current government is weakened and replaced by a young group who put Lebanon first. I, for once, would like to have that opportunity and see what happens. It cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, be any worse than the last 30+ years.
Big John- Stating that M14 is waging a war against the regime is nothing more than an excuse for HA actually waging war against the opposition. They have boots on the ground, firing bullets and missiles. Taking part in killings in Syria. It is amazing that you attempt to compare the two, let along claim that M14 is waging the war! I am a supporter of M14 and am hoping that the opposition wins and hoping they will get the help that they need. That does not mean I am waging war. HUGE difference and comical to draw a comparison.
did you grow up in Lebanon? tell me during that time you speak of that all these people supported the Syrian occupation, was it because they truly supported them or for another reason? if you grew up in Lebanon you would know the answer to that question.
FT- your argument is stale and has been answered 10000001 different times. there are more than 2 choices in life. you can keep saying stick with choice 1 because choice 2 is worse all you want simply because choice 1 fits your party's needs only! It doesn't change the facts that choices 3-10000001 are available.
first- your answer clearly shows you are getting your information second hand. you either did not grow up in Lebanon or are too young to have experienced the occupation first hand.
second- I love the antics you and FT deploy as smear campaigns against the people that hurt your parties the most. tying wahabies to LF and syrian boot licking to burtous Harb. Shameless and worthless. As if these forums change public opinion in anyway. good night fellas and have a good weekend.
Southern, you keep talking about the US failure in Iraq.. Wake up man and stop hallucinating. US went there to remove Saddam and they did.. Saddam was hung.. Mission accomplished.. This murderer Syrian dictator will soon bite the dust...
looking 4 media visibility tinybrain? u rn't answering Gabby14; Y do u post up here? u belong to the bottom of this page, because u r @ the bottom of the lebanese society.
gracias 4 understanding.
Except the "hezz" was founded in 82... try again.
Plus, what are these petty accusations? 70s? really? Everyone was corrupt so to take a moral high ground is hilarious.
@bigjohn
There is no denying that the huge Lebanese demonstration on March 14 was the final nail in the coffin of Syria's presence in Our country. Nice of you to recognize that.
But if we're not for George Bush and Frances Jack Chirac putting the screws to Assad no Lebanese demonstration no matter how large would have accomplished the task. It was the combined American French threat of force that did the trick.
When recalling history please make the effort to make a complete recollection.
According to history you are all discredited ...
Mr.Preident Obama , swallow your pride ! Do what the Brittish did , consult your people first !
You have enough on your plate ..over Trillion plus in debt , unemployment at all time high , economy at all time low , how many theatres of war at a loss ? Worry about your own people & country , don't worry about Israel they are doing fine , at the moment , that is ...
Otherwise the "One way Door of Hell " is awaiting for you & your coalition !!!!!
Signed Wolf ...
I don't belied that there so many delusional bloggers on here who think that President Bashar will be toppled... The terrorist that you support have been at the same mission now going into 3 years without a result.. Now your new tactics of using chem weapons on civilians is also failing... I guess you all over read into Obama saying "the use of chem weapons is a red line" to any logical person all these recent event of countries that you counted on to take action are dropping like flies.. I believe it is now safe to congratulate the Syrian people and President Bashar for defeating the terrorists.. You might as well move on and shift your racist, extreme, takfiri focus somewhere else..
No one is more terrorist than the long neck airhead, who assisinated all the anti-syrian politicians in Lebanon, is it Israel and the takfiris, how about Ghazi Ka3an and his brother Ali, again the takfiris, now make some sense and tell me where those chemical weapons came from? if Al-Qaida had them, then 1- they would have used them against the US army in Afghanistan and Iraq, does it ever occur to you that any major assassination or mass killings (1400 in this instance) only occur on the anti-Syrian regime side? you mean to tell me that Al-Qaida messed up and bombed those who are against the regime.
GCC paid for the chem weapons that were supplied by the US transported via Turkish channels so qeida/nusra would unleash these weapons to force a western attack to end the leadership of Syria. However this has failed and now the Syrian terrorists and their backers being GCC and Turkey cry foul because their plan backfired in their face.. You claim 1400 dead? Can you back it? Or simply just another number plucked for propaganda purposes as per previous claims made unconfirmed sources?
They were launched by AL-Qaida, shame on the bonehead who let them steal those chemicals. Tomorrow they will sell them to Israel. Summary as I said last year, Bashar needs to move on and GO as he failed the leadership role.
@cedars
That is because the west have Supllied the CW, the Turks administered it then in turn the Rebels have used it !!!
Signed Wolf !
Those who die by chemicals are true martyrs , they make a difference in word behaviour and might save us all.
No one can say this isn't true, but if America was to kill bas hae all this would stop do you actually think the Syrian troops are anything without bashar. He is just a coward not really an enemy seriously he's hiding out. America could show that they will not tolerate any of his actions. It's can't be that hard to just eliminate bashar troops, do you really thing they even compare to us army. Like come one people America has the ability to end the war. I am lebaneese but do not live there. I know it can be a better place. Why let this war go on and get worse when it can easily get better. I'm my opinion he is not dangerous, it's just that there's no one stronger willing to stop him.