Syrian FM Welcomes Russia's Calls to Hand Over Chemical Weapons
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةSyrian President Bashar Assad's foreign minister on Monday welcomed Russia's proposal that Damascus hand over control of its chemical weapons arsenal to international supervision to avoid U.S. military action.
"I carefully listened to (Russian foreign minister) Sergei Lavrov's statement about it. In connection with this, I note that Syria welcomes the Russian initiative based on the Syrian leadership's concern about the lives of our nationals and the security of our country," Walid al-Muallem said in televised comments.
"We also hail the wisdom of the Russian leadership which is trying to prevent an American aggression against our people," he added without elaborating.
Lavrov called Monday on the Syrian regime to hand over control of its chemical weapons arsenal to international supervision as a way of staving off the threat of military action.
After talks with al-Muallem in Moscow, Lavrov called on Syria to "place the chemical weapons under international control and then have them destroyed".
He said such a plan would help "avoid military strikes" that are being considered by the United States and its allies. Lavrov said he had already made the proposal to Muallem and hoped for a "quick and positive answer" from Syria.
"We do not know if Syria agrees to this, but if placing the chemical weapons under international control helps avoid military strikes, then we will immediately get to work on this," Lavrov said.
"We have already handed over this proposal to minister Muallem, who is in Moscow, and hope for a quick and positive answer," Lavrov said in a prepared statement he read out to reporters at a news briefing in Moscow.
As well as handing over the weapons and having them destroyed, Syria should also become a full member of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, Lavrov said.
Meanwhile, Syria's top rebel commander in a television interview Monday accused President Bashar Assad's regime and Moscow of deceit after Syria welcomed a Russian proposal to hand over its chemical weapons.
"We call for strikes and we warn the international community that this (Assad) regime tells lies, and the liar (Russian President Vladimir) Putin is its teacher. Putin is the biggest liar," Free Syrian Army chief Selim Idriss told Al-Jazeera.
Idriss was enraged by both Lavrov and Muallem's comments, and urged the world not to believe them.
"The regime wants to buy time to save itself" from a proposed strike, the rebel chief told the Qatar-based satellite broadcaster.
"I say to decision-makers that we know this regime, we have experienced it, and we warn you against falling into its trap of deceit and dishonesty," Idriss said.
Damascus and Moscow both "know that a vote is coming up in the U.S. Congress, and they also know that such strikes would bring down Assad's regime", he said.
Lavrov's comments on Monday came after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said earlier that Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding his purported use of chemical weapons by turning "every single bit" of his arsenal over to the international community by the end of the week.
Asked by a reporter in London whether there was anything Assad's government could do or offer to stop a military strike, Kerry answered: "Sure, he could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week -- turn it over, all of it without delay and allow the full and total accounting (of it), but he isn't about to do it and it can't be done."
Moscow has also made clear it is unconvinced that the Syrian regime was behind the chemical weapons attack on August 21 that the United States and its allies say was carried out by the government.
The visit by Muallem came as U.S. lawmakers were to return Monday from a summer break and debate limited U.S. military action in Syria.
Russia and the United States agreed in May to organize a peace conference in Geneva bringing all sides to the table, but the idea is fast receding as momentum grows for strikes over the alleged chemical attack outside Damascus.
Nice move Lavrov:) But that will not help, would it not since it was not the regime that used Chemical weapons! You need to lobby with the rebels and convince them to hand over their stockpiles of sarin and put it under international supervision.
Not necessarily.
You see, if chemical weapons are under international control and accounted for, then there can be no future false flag operations as the regime claims. The US has said Al-Assad must be punished so to not use chemical weapons again, a deterrent. You know, because the US apparently fear chemical attacks on their soil, and are appalled by the affront to humanity, whatever that's interpreted as by the US government.
No point in a military strike if there are no chemical weapons to use eh? Slick, the Russians, now to see how Obama handles this (another foreign policy blunder probably).
Even Kerry agrees:
"John Kerry said earlier Monday that Syrian President Bashar Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding ... use of chemical weapons by turning "every single bit" of his arsenal over to the international community"
Well anyway, things seem to be steering in the right direction, a political solution to replace Al-Assad rather than killing more people.
Why not endless. But someone has to pay for the 1429 lives that Assad took by ordering the chemical attack. Destroying them is NOT enough.
benzona, yes I agree, but don't see how it's so different than using conventional weapons in the case of Syria because it's not fully participant in the prohibition of chemical weapons community. Of course, laws don't hold much weight in the face of such death, yes, it should definitely be punished.
I personally believe that it was likely, as likely a false flag by the opposition, that it was Al-Assad's older brother; the impulsive, easily crazed commander of the 4th armored division which was tasked in the relevant offensive attack.
More investigations will tell, you need to scratch the surface a bit more to realize the evidence isn't as strong as they tell us they are.
benzona: whoever ordered the attack should pay, yes, but until now there is no proof that it is the regime. common sense is actually against this account of the facts since the regime had just allowed UN chemical weapons inspectors to enter syria.
this blatant violation of the "red line" was designed to provoke a foreign intervention, and who profits from the crime?
@gabby14
We share the same views and I am not sure that the use of pejorative words help our case any. Leave it to the other side to take the low road. Please.
haile.selassie, true indeed, they are to be used as a deterrent.
Your point it seems is Israel's unlawful possession of Atomic weapons, which is a clear danger. My saying this is exactly its point. It's a deterrent. But this is only the beginning of the issue.
You see, those 300 or so nuclear warheads only work as a deterrent so long as nobody in the region has such weapons. It's a very effective deterrent. However, Israel is too small a country to continue using them as a deterrent if anyone else in the region has advanced nuclear technology. They will no longer act as deterrents and Israel would follow the example of South Africa.
What's more pressing is that this is an issue that must be dealt with, because nuclear technology is the future, and especially relevant to the KSA, they will start relying on nuclear technology to pump oil/produce more oil/save money/become modernized/use less oil themselves, and this, which will have direct impact on the price of oil in the world, will be a big issue with Israel, which will work to prevent it from being realized, potentially endangering the world economy because of oil's absolute vitalness, if it has not yet made peace with its regional neighbors.
naharnet doesnt tolerate the use of animal names, or so they say.
"Calling Saudis by animal names not only is abusive and disrespectful but brings no value to your comment" Naharnet.
Obama don't you believe those blatant liars ! Just like the basij in the nuclear file, they will keep cheating , and slipping away. They only understand the language of brutal force which they have been applying to their people and neighbouring countries for so long. Give them a stick! The big one!! That's what they understand best.
"too much energy and resources fighting each other rather than fighting the Israeli enemy because we have LOUSY leaders."
you are a bit off here--yet we have lousy leaders and even worse leadership, but resources should be spent on education and making people and society better, not 'fighting the israeli enemy' as you refer to. You want to beat israel, you do it economically, socially, and have people look at your country as a beacon, not a dumping ground.
Scapegoating israel or any other country as a symbol of failure is the work of a fool and a sign of failure. If you can't look at yourself to see both the problem and the solution, then you may as well live with big FAIL across your forehead.
dude, please you sound more and more childish any time you bring up a point. "well if he does, then he has to do it"
grow up
I don't despise you--I just think you don't know how to think.
you have the classic symptoms of indoctrination--please seek help.
"there is another part not discussed in here that talks about assad not running for presidential election next summer."
Can you verify this?
M11er, I see, an interesting development. I'm sure we will hear of it soon. Cheers for the heads up!
Southern, by friendly states you mean Israel? Just wondering...oh! must include North Korea.
you are a coward....by the tree if sound like you might be lebanese. If so go bury yourself...if it was not for syria, you would be in occupied land right now. all you lebanese should appreciate everything that the SYRIANS did for you. You make me SICK
JANET (Guest)
Syria has killed more of my family than any other unnatural cause. You decimated tyhe Christians for 30 years and now you market yourselves as the defenders.
Please be my guest and free your own occupied Golan before worrying about our land.
syria seems afraid of a strike... but i guess they just want to buy more time and it s all a bluff....