Iraq's Sadr Says No Anti-U.S. Attacks before Pullout
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةIraqi Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr ordered his followers not to launch any attacks on U.S. troops before a year-end deadline for their withdrawal from the country, in a statement seen on Sunday.
Sadr's remarks came just days after he backtracked on a call for popular anti-government rallies. American forces have accused militias linked to the cleric of largely being behind attacks on its soldiers.
"In order that Iraq can recover its independence through the withdrawal of the invaders from our territory, I judge it indispensable to halt all armed resistance operations until the complete withdrawal of the occupying forces," Sadr said in the statement originally issued Saturday.
"If the pullout is completed and there is no longer a single U.S. soldier on our territory, the military operations will end definitively but if that is not the case and Iraq remains in a state of dependency, they will resume with greater vigor," Sadr said.
He paid tribute to "the resistance for its actions" and said his movement was now working "hand in hand with the government to achieve the liberation of the country and supporting it against U.S. pressure."
In July, Major General Jeffrey Buchanan, spokesman for U.S. forces in Iraq, accused three Shiite militia groups of being behind attacks on U.S. troops.
He named them as the Promised Day Brigades, formed by Sadr in November 2008, and Ketaeb Hizbullah and Asaib Ahl al-Haq, two splinter groups which broke away from Sadr's former Mahdi Army militia which fought U.S.-led troops from 2004 to 2007.
The cleric's bloc holds six cabinet posts and has 40 seats in parliament.
Sadr said in a separate statement on Monday that he was giving Iraq's government a "last chance" to implement reforms, after earlier calling for protests.
His statement comes as Washington and Baghdad deliberate over the size of a U.S. military training mission to last beyond year-end, after Iraqi leaders said last month they were open to such plans.
The new U.S. Army chief warned on Thursday against leaving too large a force in Iraq after 2011, saying too many boots on the ground could feed the perception of an American "occupation."
General Ray Odierno commanded U.S. forces in Iraq until last year and was one of the senior officers who spearheaded the troop "surge" in 2007, which the military believes turned the tide in the war and reduced sectarian violence.
He spoke amid a debate in Washington over the scale of a possible future U.S. military mission in Iraq and after Defense Secretary Leon Panetta endorsed a tentative plan for a force of 3,000-4,000 troops.
Some U.S. lawmakers have criticized that number of soldiers and say senior officers favor a larger force of at least 10,000, which would include a unit deployed in northern Iraq to defuse Arab-Kurdish tensions.
But Odierno told reporters the United States had to carefully balance how many troops were needed to assist Iraqi forces while scaling back the American profile in a country where anti-U.S. sentiment still runs high.
"I will say when I was leaving Iraq a year ago, I always felt we had to be careful about leaving too many people in Iraq," said Odierno, who took over as army chief of staff on Wednesday.
"The larger the force that we leave behind ... (the more) comments of 'occupation force' remain," he added.
This should attract the LSM but the of those ignorant are considering Lebanon to be an island in the pacific ocean. Anyhow Iran Is trading off with the Americans . You leave Syria and we keep it calm in Iraq...
MrBrain
LOL What a retard that Sadr Baboon is! He actually thinks that he, the retarded sacrificial tool of the Supreme Criminal in Tehran, can blackmail the free world, well I'm sure he's got everyone shaking in his boots...!! Typical Iranian regime BS they get their sacrifial tools to execute their Tehran and Quom hatched plots against the allied forces and the free people of the ME and then use them as chips in hope they could blackmail the free world into submission.these individuals (like the turbanator in Lebanon) are usually chosen from the most ignorant of all of the Shiite population, otherwise how else can they render them zombie clerics in Qom and have them preach a self defeating and brainless suicidal Faqihi ideology of hatred, intolerance, criminality from their respective holes in the Ground. Does all of this rhetoric sound earily familiar to all the free people in Lebanon?...
All of these Baboons the likes of Sadr, Nasrallah, and the other newly "Quom Grown" sacrificial zombies are there to distract the allies from the real source ... GO AFTER THE DAMN SOURCE!!! Ayone in the ME who has ever dreamt about freedom and democracy and a good and proseprous peaceful future for his family and mostly Children (be he Christian, Muslim, Shiite, Jew, Druze, Alwaite...) cannot but realize that the source of all their ailements and sufferings lies in Tehran and Quom.Join forces with the free world (because only a freeman frees another man and never a slave) and send these blood thirsty criminal Mullahs back to hell where they came from!!!