Britain Fears New Cold War over Iran Nukes
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةIran's nuclear ambitions could trigger "a new Cold War" more perilous than that between the West and the Soviet Union, British Foreign Secretary warned on Friday.
William Hague said Iran obtaining a nuclear bomb would spark an atomic arms race between rival Middle Eastern nations that could be more dangerous than the original Cold War because the old "safety mechanisms" are missing.
"If (the Iranians) obtain nuclear weapons capability, then I think other nations across the Middle East will want to develop nuclear weapons," he told Britain's Daily Telegraph newspaper.
"The most serious round of nuclear proliferation since nuclear weapons were invented would have begun with all the destabilizing effects in the Middle East," he continued.
"And the threat of a new Cold War in the Middle East without necessarily all the safety mechanisms... would be a disaster in world affairs."
Iran faces four sets of U.N. sanctions and a raft of unilateral U.S. and EU sanctions designed to halt a program the West fears conceals a drive for nuclear weapons.
Tehran denies this charge, saying its nuclear project is for purely peaceful purposes.
In response to feverish speculation in recent weeks that Israel is preparing to mount a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear program, Hague said Iran being "attacked militarily" would have "enormous downsides.”
"We are very clear to all concerned that we are not advocating military action," he told the Telegraph.
"We support a twin-track strategy of sanctions and pressure and negotiations on the other hand."
"We are not favoring the idea of anybody attacking Iran at the moment," he added."
Earlier Friday, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the European Union's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton voiced cautious optimism about the prospect for Iran to return to stalled nuclear talks with six world powers.
In a February 14 letter to Ashton, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili said Tehran is ready to resume talks at the "earliest" opportunity as long as the six powers respect its right to peaceful atomic energy.
That letter should have been sent to Israel. It is the world power. How come Pakistan and India and China are not a problem in possessing nuclear weapons. The answer is the number of their population.
guys at the rate naharnet is removing posts (without any logical reason) and keeping really offensive cmments like flamethrower and jabalamel and mowaten,... it looks like the person in charge on this site is not correct.
i suggest you all beware......
They are doing what Nasrallah instructed the current 'opposition' to do. Control the press, internet site etc. it was in his Thursday night speech. sad, sad, sad! Everyone should be able to speak freely as long as they don't insult other people.
the filthy zionist media terrorists found conspiracy explanation for naharnet editors removing their retarded posts.
it's nasrallah instructed the patriotic coalition to control the media so now naharnet editors will be killed, together with their wider families if they don't obey.
i knew you would say something retarded like this. how could they not remove you after this?
Iran has its nukes, story over. All that can be done now is to isolate Iran with its nukes by breaking the land bridge that runs from Tehran to the Eastern Med.
This means Syria. The world should support the Syrian people, not just for the sake of their martyrs but for the sake of all people who wish to contain the Persian nuclear bomb, for the sake of the rest of the world that values human life, human rights and the rule of law.