Santorum Says Afghans Must Apologize for 'Overreacting' over Koran Burning

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

White House hopeful Rick Santorum accused Afghans on Sunday of "overreacting" over Koran burning as he stepped up his criticism of President Barack Obama for apologizing over the incident.

The Republican presidential candidate said there was "no deliberate act ... of disrespect" when U.S. authorities at Bagram airbase north of Kabul apparently disposed of the Islamic holy books in a fire.

The United States rushed to condemn the burnings, and Obama apologized to the Afghan people for what he said was a mistake.

President Hamid Karzai went on television Sunday to appeal for calm, after an explosion of outrage over the burning resulted in dozens of deaths, including two U.S. military advisers killed in Afghanistan's interior ministry.

Obama's apology in itself had "made it sound like there was something that you should apologize for, and there was no act that needed an apology," Santorum told NBC's "Meet the Press" talkshow.

"I think the response needs to be apologized for, by Karzai and the Afghan people, for attacking and killing our men and women in uniform, and overreacting to this inadvertent mistake. That is the real crime, not what our soldiers did."

Afghan Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak telephoned Defense Secretary Leon Panetta Saturday and apologized for the killing of the Americans, the Pentagon said.

Santorum's main Republican rival, Mitt Romney told Fox News Sunday that "with regards to the (Obama) apology, I think for a lot of people, it sticks in their throat.

"The idea that we are there, having lost thousands of individuals through casualty and death -- we've made an enormous contribution to help the people there achieve freedom, and for us to be apologizing at a time like this is something which is very difficult for the American people to countenance."

Santorum said he does "commend the president for his commitment of troops" in the counterinsurgency mission in Afghanistan, while Romney acknowledged the need for Americans to continue helping in the transition from U.S. to Afghan control of security.

"We don't want to see Afghanistan once again return to a Taliban-dominated nation with al-Qaida and other training camps," he said.

A third Republican presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich, made more strident denunciations of Obama's apology, labeling him an appeaser and saying he was "deeply offended" that Obama didn't hold Karzai responsible for the killings.

"There doesn't seem to be any request for an apology from Karzai," Gingrich told Fox News on Saturday.

"And I frankly just think this one-sided process of apologizing for America has gone too far," he said. "Churches get burned in Nigeria, there are no apologies. Churches get burned in Egypt, there are no apologies."

Comments 9
Default-user-icon John from Koura (Guest) 27 February 2012, 03:25

The Americans are ONLY concerned about the US murdering soldiers who are have slaughtered thousands of Afghan civilians.

Missing samiam 27 February 2012, 16:40

This guy is a wackjob who has no idea what goes on in the rest of the world--I can't imagine why anyone would vote for him.

Thumb chrisrushlau 27 February 2012, 18:49

The US has been providing comic relief to the World since before you were born.

Thumb chrisrushlau 27 February 2012, 19:03

To understand the US voter in relationship to the Israel lobby, consider a Lebanese voter living under the "Taef Accord". The first thing you might ask about this "accord" is who actually agreed to it. But you don't ask. People in the US don't ask what the Israel lobby is good for. They just fear it. Who do you blame?

Missing chris 27 February 2012, 19:24

People don't fear it. The politicians do, their job is digging dirt on each one, and save it in their files. They will blackmail the politician, when needed.

Default-user-icon Leo (Guest) 27 February 2012, 19:42

Most Americans don't even know where the hell Lebanon is, let alone cares what happens here. Lebanon is very irrelevent to the majority of Americans.

Thumb beiruti 27 February 2012, 19:46

The issue with the burning of Korans is that the soldiers who did it are part of a force that has been in country in Afghanistan for 10 years. In 10 years, they didn't figure out what a Kuran looks like, that you might get the natives riled if you burn them? And since when is burning any book, much less a religious book something that the US does?

The act was simply inexcusable. It had foreseeable consequences of creating instability and unless the President disavowed the act as being the act of individuals, not of the USG, then the entire force over there would have been put at risk.

Thumb beiruti 27 February 2012, 19:46

If we are intent on changing whole nations, it is incumbent upon the US to at least know their language, culture and religion. To do otherwise is to act out of ignorence, saw like George W. Bush did. What is incredible is that these clowns running to be the next US President, while claiming to be religious, condone the burning of religous books. Santorum needs to apologize for pretending to be a human being.

Missing ayoor 27 February 2012, 23:15

it is about time the americans say sorry and destroy hassouni and his familia in retaliation for all the masacres against the christians in iraq, egypt and nigeria. we want a christian lebanon