Virginia High Court Rules in Favor of Climate Scientist
The supreme court of Virginia on Friday ruled in favor of a prominent climate scientist, blocking a two-year attempt by state officials to get access to his university emails and grant materials.
The case was brought by state attorney general Ken Cuccinelli, a skeptic of global warming, against the University of Virginia where well known climate scientist Michael Mann taught from 1999 to 2005.
Cuccinelli had tried to obtain Mann's communications relating to grants he received to conduct climate science research, alleging there may have been data manipulated to show a rise in global temperatures linked to fossil fuel use.
The attorney general sought the information -- which would have included research drafts, handwritten notes and emails -- via the state's Fraud Against Taxpayers Act.
But the Virginia Supreme Court came down on the university's side, saying Cuccinelli's bid had no legal standing because the university was neither a "person" nor a "corporation" under the act and therefore could not be probed.
Also, Cuccinelli's stated reason for the investigation "did not sufficiently state what the Attorney General suspected Dr. Mann did that was 'false or fraudulent,'" the ruling said.
The Union of Concerned Scientists hailed the ruling and said Cuccinelli was part of a "small but vocal minority in a pointless and costly investigation."
"We applaud the high court for reaffirming that Mr. Cuccinelli didn't have a legal leg to stand on in his pursuit of Mann's and other scientists' private correspondence," said Michael Halpern, program manager for UCS scientific integrity program.
"The university should be commended for its courage in standing up to the attorney general to ensure Virginia will remain a safe place for scientific research, even when elected officials don't like the results."
A lower circuit court judge had set aside Cuccinelli's request in 2010, ruling the attorney general had failed to provide evidence of wrongdoing by Mann or his colleagues.
Mann, who is now director of Pennsylvania State University's Earth System Science Center, was among the scientists whose emails were leaked in the 2009 "Climategate" scandal after the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit's servers were hacked.
If he is getting public money he should turn over all his research as any good scientist would. If he is open and above board why did it have to go to court? The only reason is he lied. I don't know if his lie is about the climate or if he used public funds for things other then what they were granted for. But that is what is going on. Any scientist shares his data and the methods of how he acquired that data. That is what the scientific process is. This uy sticks.