Islamists Claim Initial Victory in Egypt Referendum
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةA slender majority of Egyptians approved a disputed constitution backed by President Mohammed Morsi and Islamist allies in the first round of a referendum, Islamists and an opposition group said Sunday, citing unofficial results.
Saturday's voting in 10 provinces including Cairo came after weeks of mass protests organised by an opposition coalition that initially aimed to torpedo the referendum, before it instead issued last-minute calls for the draft's rejection.
The unofficial first round results, based on tallies providing by returning officers, fall far short of the landslide Islamists had hoped would quiet the restive opposition and reward Morsi's gamble of rushing through the charter.
By Sunday morning, with most votes tallied, Morsi's Freedom and Justice Party said on its website 56.5 percent voted for the constitution in the hurriedly organised referendum, roughly the same figure reported by Egyptian media.
The second round of voting will be next Saturday, after which the official result will become known.
The main opposition coalition, the National Salvation Front, had announced on Saturday night after polls closed that almost two thirds of voters had rejected the constitution drafted by an Islamist-dominated council.
But one of the coalition's main groups, the Popular Current, reported on its official Facebook page on Sunday morning that an estimated 56 percent of voters approved the charter, with the count almost complete.
Violence between the charter's supporters and opponents flared in Egypt's two largest cities, Cairo and Alexandria, in the past 48 hours, with police repelling an Islamist attack on the liberal Wafd party headquarters in Cairo on Saturday night.
According the preliminary results, a majority voted against the charter in the capital, the opposition's bastion.
If the constitution is approved, Morsi hopes it will end a tumultuous transition almost two years after a popular uprising overthrew president Hosni Mubarak, ushering in interim military rule and then Morsi's election in June.
But the lead-up to the referendum, staggered over two rounds to ensure there were enough judicial officials to monitor the voting after many judges boycotted the vote, has left the country deeply divided.
Liberals and Christians had boycotted the assembly drafting the charter, complaining that the Islamist-dominated assembly ignored their concerns.
Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood and its Freedom and Justice Party threw its formidable organisational machine behind a "yes" campaign for the draft constitution.
The proposed charter "offers rights and stability," said one Cairo voter who backed it, Kassem Abdallah, on Saturday.
But many opposition voters were especially hostile towards the Brotherhood, which the National Salvation Front believes wants to usher in strict Islamic sharia laws.
Sally Rafid, a 28-year-old Christian voter, said: "There are many things in the constitution people don't agree on, and it's not just the articles on religion."
International watchdogs, the U.N. human rights chief, the United States and the European Union have all expressed reservations about the draft because of loopholes that could be used to weaken human rights.
Analysts said it was likely -- but not certain -- that the draft constitution would be adopted.
Whatever the outcome, "lasting damage to the civility of Egyptian politics will be the main outcome of the current path Morsi has set Egypt on," analyst Issandr El Amrani wrote for the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank.
"If the 'no' vote wins, the Morsi presidency will have been fully discredited and the pressure for his resignation will only increase," he said. "If 'yes' wins, the protest movement is unlikely to die down, (and) may radicalize."
The referendum was made possible only by Morsi's adoption last month of extensive powers that stripped a court of the right to annul the constituent assembly, as many had expected it to do on December 2.
Morsi was forced to rescind his powers after mass protests and clashes outside his palace between his supporters and opponents killed eight people last week and injured hundreds.
The voting is so about Morsi and the Islamists. Why are you trying to deny facts? Democracy is not just about the rule of the majority. It about guaranteeing minority rights, personal freedoms the separation of church/mosque and state among many more concepts.
A constitution is like the foundation of a hi-rise, if not correctly and solidly implemented then it will carry within it the seeds of the collapse of the whole structure.
Does that mean now that one can go to Egypt and find that 5-year old wife he's already dreamed of? Sick, sick Islamist trash.
does that mean that if I go to the Vatican I will see people hanging themselves on crosses with nails in their arms? Stop Islamophobia.
you make no sense mohammad...and yes, you can go to the vatican and do an islamic prayer in front of st andrew square, that is not only lawfully permitted...but also socially tolerated. very terrible irrelevant comparison.
A constitution that is not in the best interest of ALL constituents of a society is not a constitution but an instrument of oppression.
Morsi is too obsessed with his new powers that he is leading Egypt into ongoing turmoil.
It is impossible to please all...did you know that the US constitution was written by 56 people and only 39 of them voted "yes" on it? It was never put to the public...Canada's constitution is still not ratified by the province of Quebec which has 24% of Canada's population...
But both constitutions guarantee equal rights and representation for all. Minorities are safe from the doctrines of the majority. Separation of Church and State. etc. etc.
Even illegal immigrants have undeniable rights.
Quebec has some autonomy but they are very much part of Canada. There are some tiny differences in the Charter of Rights & Freedoms, Meech Lake Accords, if that is what you are thinking. You can't compare a democratic and peaceloving country like Canada, to a backward state whose most dominant political party are the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. You are talking about a party which seeks to strip many of their rights based on religious alone, implementation of Islamic law (which violates much of Canadian law), reduced rights for women, increased religious enforcement, censoring news media, blasphemy charges. Very bad comparison again, with all due respect. Not even Rene Levesque himself had that much animosity for the English as Ikhwani ilks have for non-Muslims and Muslims who do not follow their fascist ways.
Kanadian you are talking like religion is the source of all evil, which is, of course, ridiculous. Quebec NEVER signed the constitution to this day (I am not talking about the Meech Lake Accord, I am talking about the constitution...Quebec, with 24% of the population, to this day never agreed to the constitution) And yes, Canada is very much functioning even though Quebec never signed it. (Actually, the constitutions did not guarantee equal rights, are you forgetting about the Quebecois? Are you talking about Slavery in the US? They were both constitutionally sanctioned prejudices... And neither constitution was voted upon by the general populations...
You can't compare the Muslim Brotherood + Salafi party's to anything found in a civil state like Canada. In Quebec, people of all religions/atheists have equal rights -- these are not tangible. People of all colours, ethnic backgrounds have equal rights. The only ones that got a little bit jaded were the English, but not much. I liked in Quebec for years, never had an issue. With the party's in Egypt, you have one side who seeks to strip the side opposed of their rights based on the perception they acquired of Islam.
What you said is all besides the point...and by the way having a fundamentalist Christian like Harper in power and a separtist fundamentalist like Marois in power is also equally worrying. French laws passed in Quebec are quite discriminatory and Catholic school funding in Ontario is also very discriminatory so let's not fool ourselves, nowhere is perfect, nowhere has full consensus on a constitution..
it's comical to see people comparing free voting, free protests, a real sense of opposition in Egypt, free press, and then they compare that to Mubarak and 'a lot worse'
Lebanon's constitution says, "Shiites, go to hell, and Sunnis, help them get there." This constitution was approved by an overwhelming majority of French spies, English managers, US mercenaries, and Israeli mental patients. Not to overlook the "kings" of the Persian Gulf.
chrisrushlau.......Lebanon's constitution has its shortcomings for sure, but our citizens have bigger shortcomings and it is still the most democratic of all Middle Eastern Countries (including Israel's).
Let me ask you this ... if you were to propose a constitution, what will its tenants be? Just main outlines (couple of sentences). I will read your response objectively.