Israel Raids on Syria Killed at Least 42 Soldiers

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Israeli raids on Syrian targets at the weekend killed at least 42 soldiers, a watchdog said Monday, as U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon led calls for restraint to prevent the war spilling over borders.

"At least 42 soldiers were killed in the strikes, and another 100 who would usually be at the targeted sites remain unaccounted for" after the Israeli strikes near Damascus, said Rami Abdel Rahman of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

The Britain-based watchdog group had earlier given a toll of at least 15 soldiers killed.

"These three sites (targeted) would usually have around 150 soldiers in them, but it's not clear if they were all there at the time of the strikes."

Sunday's pre-dawn Israeli raids were the Jewish state's second such attack on Syria in 48 hours.

A senior Israeli source said the raids targeted Iranian weapons destined for Lebanon's Hizbullah.

Iran and Hizbullah are steadfast allies of Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime, and arch-foes of of Israel.

The strikes came ahead of a visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's to China, another ally of Assad's regime.

Ban, meanwhile, warned against any escalation of a conflict that has killed more than 70,000 people in Syria since it erupted in March 2011.

"The secretary general calls on all sides to exercise maximum calm and restraint, and to act with a sense of responsibility to prevent an escalation of what is already a devastating and highly dangerous conflict," his spokesman Martin Nesirky said.

"The secretary general urges respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries in the region, and adherence to all relevant Security Council resolutions."

Ban spoke by telephone with Arab League chief Nabil al-Arabi, whose 22-member bloc demanded U.N. Security Council intervention to stop such Israeli attacks.

Egypt condemned the raids as a "violation" of international law, Britain warned of "increasing danger" to the Middle East, and France called for a political solution to the conflict.

Russia, the Assad regime's most powerful ally, said it was "especially" concerned by the Israeli strikes, warning they threatened neighboring Lebanon.

China implicitly criticized the Israeli strikes as Netanyahu arrived in Shanghai, saying "we are opposed to the use of force and believe that the sovereignty of any country should be respected".

The Syrian regime's main regional ally Iran said the strikes would shorten Israel's existence, and denied the weapons targeted were from the Islamic republic.

Damascus said in a letter to the Security Council that Israeli warplanes launched an "aggression," firing missiles against three army positions.

A diplomatic source in Beirut told AFP the sites were the Jamraya military facility, a nearby weapons depot and an anti-aircraft unit in Sabura, west of the capital.

The letter said claims Syria was transferring anything were "unfounded" and accused Israel of coordinating with "terrorist groups" -- the regime term for rebels fighting to oust Assad.

Official Al-Ikhbariya television quoted unnamed sources as saying that "Syrian missiles are ready to strike specific targets in case of any (further) violations".

Sunday's strike came about 48 hours after a reported Israeli raid on a weapons storage facility at Damascus airport.

Residents of the Damascus district of Dumar said Sunday's strike felt "like an earthquake".

Video footage appeared to show missiles lighting up clouds, blazing fires, and an explosion producing a massive orange fireball.

Israel reportedly targeted the Jamraya facility earlier this year, in a January 30 raid its officials have implicitly acknowledged.

Comments 15
Missing maroun 06 May 2013, 12:29

you are spot on.

Missing paulassaf 06 May 2013, 14:24

And now the Shia will retaliate on Israel by raping women then chopping off their breasts like the hazara shia have done in Afghanistan

Thumb shab 06 May 2013, 14:46

more popcorn please

Thumb benzona 06 May 2013, 15:11

2.OOO LL please!

Missing h.mousawy 06 May 2013, 14:46

The Anglo-Wahhabi-zionist mafia is determined to prevent a peaceful resolution to the crisis in Syria by flooding the country with weapons and al-Qaeda terrorists.

True, there are myriad groups battling government forces but they are neither independent nor have support of the Syrian people. The overwhelming majority is made up of mercenaries financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar — two “shining examples” of democracy in the Muslim East — and aided and abetted by the US, Israel, the Hariri clan in Lebanon and an odd assortment of US allies from Europe. 

Nor is the uprising in Syria as 'spontaneous' as those that occurred in Tunisia and Egypt. The Syrian uprising has multiple layers and numerous players. Beyond the media war is a convergence of forces that appear determined to bring about regime change in Syria.

Missing beirutbastard00 06 May 2013, 19:53

Exactly! But also don't forget that the fsa is comprised of the same soldiers that were stepping on our necks. That's y I say f-em both.

Missing peace 06 May 2013, 16:04

lol....

Default-user-icon Cedruslibani (Guest) 06 May 2013, 17:48

Agree with ex-progma... It's all a game against the Ghanem of the Middle East. Assad is smarter than people give him credit for. He is 100% in coordination with Israel. He will never cross the red lines... Pity our Shiite brothers have not smelt the coffee yet. No to Israel, Syria, Iran and Saudi. Yes yes yes to Lebanon.... Wake ya Ghanem....

Default-user-icon Cedruslibani (Guest) 06 May 2013, 17:51

Agree with ex-progma... It's all a game against the Ghanem of the Middle East. Assad is smarter than people give him credit for. He is 100% in coordination with Israel. He will never cross the red lines... Pity our Shiite brothers have not smelt the coffee yet. No to Israel, Syria, Iran and Saudi. Yes yes yes to Lebanon.... Wake ya Ghanem....

Missing beirutbastard00 06 May 2013, 18:51

The roar u seem to have a lot in common with abdelrahman, only he's in England n anti bashar, n ur in Australia n pro bashar.

The truth is probably somewhere in between the two extremes of u and abdelrahman.

Missing beirutbastard00 06 May 2013, 18:54

Starsky ur right 100%.

Missing beirutbastard00 06 May 2013, 19:10

Anyone who says this was coordinated with bashar is a total idiot.

Here is what is happening...

There is axis A, comprised of America, Israel, and the GCC. Vs axis B, comprised of Iran, hizballah, and Syria. Axis B is also protected in the UN by Russia.

The GCC is tasked with taking care of Syria, while Israel takes on hizballah, and America fights Iran. This is the plan put forward by the bush administration titled "the new Middle East".

What will happen, no one knows. But you are witnessing the birth of a new Middle East, how ever forced it may be. All these different wars are part of the same plan.

Missing beirutbastard00 06 May 2013, 19:49

Isn't it ironic that alqaida doesn't strike inside Israel? Or that it's so easy for the gulf to fund the Sunni opposition inside Syria, but not the ones in palistine? Look at how far the opposition in Syria has gotten, imagine the West Bank and gaza were funded the same way... But no.

The gulfs main concern is Iran. That's y u only see alqaids and other groups' full force directed at Shia areas.

The gulf and Israel have this concern in common. And for the GCC this is more important than the fight for Palestine.

Any attack on Iran by America will be launched from the gulf. They are full partners. Just as Iran Syria and hizballah are.

Missing beirutbastard00 06 May 2013, 19:36

No I totally agree with u, abdelrahman is sitting in London talking crap bout bashar... While ur in Australia talking crap bout the opposition. I was just pointing out that the truth of what's happening on the ground lays between the two extreme positions, as each will try to twist the facts in their favor.

Default-user-icon The Truth (Guest) 06 May 2013, 22:22

Israel could have ended the war that night, they chose not to.