China, U.S. Agree on Need for Strong Syria Resolution

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi agreed Thursday on the need for a binding U.N. Security Council resolution on Syria's chemical arms, a U.S. official said.

Kerry and Wang "were in strong agreement" on the need to act quickly to nail down a U.N. Security Council resolution, the official said.

But it remained unclear whether Beijing -- a veto-wielding member of the U.N. Security Council -- would throw its weight behind the language of a resolution currently being drafted.

"On Syria both ministers were in strong agreement on the need for a mandatory and binding U.N. Security Council resolution," a senior State Department official said.

"They discussed the value of unity among the P5 and both felt it is important for the council to act quickly.

"And for the OPCW to similarly act quickly," the official added, referring to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which oversees treaty compliance.

But he refused to be drawn on whether the two men had discussed the issue of how to enforce any resolution over their breakfast meeting at an upscale New York hotel.

"I think that gets us into the molecular structure of the conversation," the U.S. official said, adding it was "a greater level of detail than I can go into."

During Syria's civil war which erupted in March 2011, China and Russia have three times vetoed U.N. Security Council resolutions seeking to condemn the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

And it remained unclear whether Beijing would back the new resolution being drafted by the United States and Russia to bring Syria's chemical weapons stockpile under international control.

"This was not a negotiating session, this was a strategy session," the U.S. official insisted.

Russian and U.S. envoys to the United Nations are currently fine-tuning a resolution on Syria which both sides want to bring to the U.N. Security Council.

But the two sides appear to have hit a hurdle on what kind of sanctions would be slapped on Syria if it violates the resolution.

Asked whether Beijing would back the resolution, the U.S. official said: "I can't think of anything I heard this morning that would provide an indicator one way or another."

Comments 1
Thumb Senescence 26 September 2013, 18:36

They did so after Russia agreed.

The Chinese aren't really involved, they're more concerned on overtaking the US in terms of economic strength and as a world superpower in the coming decade.

They're just nodding their heads because Russia agreed, so it's in the interest of China as well by extension.

The sooner chp7 is agreed on the sooner Russia will send in troops.