Jabal, on another post, just a few minutes ago you posted this
"Tayyéb layko? what if it turns out that those pilgrims were hezbollah operatives? What is Hariri supposed to do in this case?"
so, for you, pilgrims travelling with their wives in buses, because they are shia, you assume they were operatives and it's okay that they get abducted, probably killed or tortured or both by now. it doesnt bother you.
however an armed man, holding a gun on a highly tense border, supposedly "hunting for rabbits" deserves the full benefit of the doubt?
why the double standard? why when all indicates they are pilgrims you still want to believe they are operatives, and when all indicates it's an operative attacking syria from the border, you want to assume he's a bunny hunter?
nothing new here, you still think you're in position to decide who is lebanese and who is not, and you still think that only syria-haters are allowed to be lebanese.
i'll pass on your death threats, but just remind you that only a few days ago you were preaching "respect of all living creatures" (lol) and giving lessons on how nobody should get shot at by the army because only courts can issue death sentences.
good bye slash, never a pleasure to talk to you.
slash, i made the case clear: repeating one last time in case you didnt get it:
on one hand you have an armed person at a tense border that has been used for cross-border raids and smuggling, and it's not even sure he was on lebanese territory
on the other you have unarmed pilgrims in buses with their wives, passing legally through customs and getting kidnapped by mercenaries
in both cases nothing is CERTAIN, but common sense has it that the armed person is more likely to be involved than pilgrims with their wives
either way, we all know hariri was never going to help them, it was just funny to see his saudi master giving him orders and him obeying
20 killed by tanks and shelling, 88 executed. as lavrov said yesterday:
"On the massacre in Houla, Lavrov said some victims had been killed at close range in a district controlled by opposition militants."
this seems to confirm it, probably those who rejected the rebels got executed. the others in the village are either on the rebel side, or too scared to talk, or both.
i dont believe the government forces
1- had any interest in doing that
2- could have done it in a rebel-controlled district without the rebels intervening, knowing it took several hours
this hideous crime is just the latest fad from the so-called FSA to incriminate the regime. the regime might be ugly, but the FSA is way uglier.
very weird that my comment was censored! there was absolutely no reason besides the fact that i maybe hit a sensitive spot when i said that 20 dead by tanks and mortars means 88 executed at close range.
And quoting Lavrov:
"On the massacre in Houla, Lavrov said some victims had been killed at close range in a district controlled by opposition militants."
Since the rebels controlled the zone, and regime troops were kept at distance by the rebels, how could they have gone "from house to house" like it was reported, to execute these people without rebels reacting? Especially knowing that it took several hours.
The way i see it only the FSA can be responsible for that hideous massacre, probably the killed people had rejected the rebels and were punished for that. Other villagers are either with the rebels or too scared to talk or both.
I don't admire the assad regime, it IS ugly in so many ways, but the FSA is clearly way uglier.
hahaha bandoul, yes i am darth vader and you're a little ewok.
how did LF manage to line up people on walls and shoot them without me during the uncivil war they created is still a mystery, for everybody knows they were angels.
forcing you to what little ewok?live your life, nobody is interfering with it besides the leaders you follow and who use you like a toothpick to irritate a resistance group.
those you follow dream of seeing Hezbollah disarmed not for your sake, because if you had half a brain you would know that hezbollah is protecting lebanon, and your life, freedom and well-being.
but to make way for their personal interests, they need to eradicate those who could oppose them. read some more about the civil war, don't rely just on your uncle's personal and subjective view of what happened, and you'll see that some announced many pure and glorious intentions but all they did was massacre, kill all competitors including those in their own camps, racket the locals in areas they controlled, took control of ports to impose their own taxes and smuggle drugs etc... today they say they want to give you "sovereignty" and "freedom" and you run like a little ewoke
i would laugh if all this wasnt so sad.
this post had been censored. reposting it as it was, let me know if you have any idea why it would be censored:
how you manage to survive with such a simple mind i wonder. i support people like Aoun & Nasrallah, both of which have been enemies of the assad regime when it was what was required for lebanon. remember the battle between hezbollah and syrian troops, and the long resistance of Aoun from exile while your m14 were filling their pockets in connivance with the syrian regime.
the khiyen like you say, are those who turn their coats when their saudi or american masters instruct them to, or when they have power or money ambitions.
regarding the trouble in syria, i've been saying for a year now that i don't like the assad regime, but what would come in its place is far worse.
and no, it's not like they committed suicide, far from there. many syrians support assad, or else he would have lost the power long ago. the ones killed are probably among those.
very weird that my comment was censored, for a second time! there was absolutely no reason besides the fact that i maybe hit a sensitive spot when i said that 20 dead by tanks and mortars means 88 executed at close range.
And quoting Lavrov:
"On the massacre in Houla, Lavrov said some victims had been killed at close range in a district controlled by opposition militants."
Since the rebels controlled the zone, and regime troops were kept at distance by the rebels, how could they have gone "from house to house" like it was reported, to execute these people without rebels reacting? Especially knowing that it took several hours.
The way i see it only the FSA can be responsible for that hideous massacre, probably the killed people had rejected the rebels and were punished for that. Other villagers are either with the rebels or too scared to talk or both.
I don't admire the assad regime, it IS ugly in so many ways, but the FSA is clearly way uglier.
Syrian Troops Kill Lebanese Man Near Arsal
29 May 2012, 11:49Jabal, on another post, just a few minutes ago you posted this
"Tayyéb layko? what if it turns out that those pilgrims were hezbollah operatives? What is Hariri supposed to do in this case?"
so, for you, pilgrims travelling with their wives in buses, because they are shia, you assume they were operatives and it's okay that they get abducted, probably killed or tortured or both by now. it doesnt bother you.
however an armed man, holding a gun on a highly tense border, supposedly "hunting for rabbits" deserves the full benefit of the doubt?
why the double standard? why when all indicates they are pilgrims you still want to believe they are operatives, and when all indicates it's an operative attacking syria from the border, you want to assume he's a bunny hunter?
Syrian Troops Kill Lebanese Man Near Arsal
29 May 2012, 11:52nothing new here, you still think you're in position to decide who is lebanese and who is not, and you still think that only syria-haters are allowed to be lebanese.
i'll pass on your death threats, but just remind you that only a few days ago you were preaching "respect of all living creatures" (lol) and giving lessons on how nobody should get shot at by the army because only courts can issue death sentences.
good bye slash, never a pleasure to talk to you.
Syrian Troops Kill Lebanese Man Near Arsal
29 May 2012, 13:35slash, i made the case clear: repeating one last time in case you didnt get it:
on one hand you have an armed person at a tense border that has been used for cross-border raids and smuggling, and it's not even sure he was on lebanese territory
on the other you have unarmed pilgrims in buses with their wives, passing legally through customs and getting kidnapped by mercenaries
in both cases nothing is CERTAIN, but common sense has it that the armed person is more likely to be involved than pilgrims with their wives
either way, we all know hariri was never going to help them, it was just funny to see his saudi master giving him orders and him obeying
U.N. Rights Body: Most Houla Massacre Victims were Executed
29 May 2012, 14:4520 killed by tanks and shelling, 88 executed. as lavrov said yesterday:
"On the massacre in Houla, Lavrov said some victims had been killed at close range in a district controlled by opposition militants."
this seems to confirm it, probably those who rejected the rebels got executed. the others in the village are either on the rebel side, or too scared to talk, or both.
i dont believe the government forces
1- had any interest in doing that
2- could have done it in a rebel-controlled district without the rebels intervening, knowing it took several hours
this hideous crime is just the latest fad from the so-called FSA to incriminate the regime. the regime might be ugly, but the FSA is way uglier.
U.N. Rights Body: Most Houla Massacre Victims were Executed
29 May 2012, 17:06very weird that my comment was censored! there was absolutely no reason besides the fact that i maybe hit a sensitive spot when i said that 20 dead by tanks and mortars means 88 executed at close range.
And quoting Lavrov:
"On the massacre in Houla, Lavrov said some victims had been killed at close range in a district controlled by opposition militants."
Since the rebels controlled the zone, and regime troops were kept at distance by the rebels, how could they have gone "from house to house" like it was reported, to execute these people without rebels reacting? Especially knowing that it took several hours.
The way i see it only the FSA can be responsible for that hideous massacre, probably the killed people had rejected the rebels and were punished for that. Other villagers are either with the rebels or too scared to talk or both.
I don't admire the assad regime, it IS ugly in so many ways, but the FSA is clearly way uglier.
Report: Annan to Visit Lebanon 'Soon'
30 May 2012, 08:54was going to say the same, funny that for once we agree.
dakhilak ya Annan don't come here
Syrian Troops Kill Lebanese Man Near Arsal
30 May 2012, 08:59hahaha bandoul, yes i am darth vader and you're a little ewok.
how did LF manage to line up people on walls and shoot them without me during the uncivil war they created is still a mystery, for everybody knows they were angels.
Syrian Troops Kill Lebanese Man Near Arsal
30 May 2012, 09:09forcing you to what little ewok?live your life, nobody is interfering with it besides the leaders you follow and who use you like a toothpick to irritate a resistance group.
those you follow dream of seeing Hezbollah disarmed not for your sake, because if you had half a brain you would know that hezbollah is protecting lebanon, and your life, freedom and well-being.
but to make way for their personal interests, they need to eradicate those who could oppose them. read some more about the civil war, don't rely just on your uncle's personal and subjective view of what happened, and you'll see that some announced many pure and glorious intentions but all they did was massacre, kill all competitors including those in their own camps, racket the locals in areas they controlled, took control of ports to impose their own taxes and smuggle drugs etc... today they say they want to give you "sovereignty" and "freedom" and you run like a little ewoke
i would laugh if all this wasnt so sad.
U.N. Rights Body: Most Houla Massacre Victims were Executed
30 May 2012, 13:48this post had been censored. reposting it as it was, let me know if you have any idea why it would be censored:
how you manage to survive with such a simple mind i wonder. i support people like Aoun & Nasrallah, both of which have been enemies of the assad regime when it was what was required for lebanon. remember the battle between hezbollah and syrian troops, and the long resistance of Aoun from exile while your m14 were filling their pockets in connivance with the syrian regime.
the khiyen like you say, are those who turn their coats when their saudi or american masters instruct them to, or when they have power or money ambitions.
regarding the trouble in syria, i've been saying for a year now that i don't like the assad regime, but what would come in its place is far worse.
and no, it's not like they committed suicide, far from there. many syrians support assad, or else he would have lost the power long ago. the ones killed are probably among those.
U.N. Rights Body: Most Houla Massacre Victims were Executed
30 May 2012, 13:50very weird that my comment was censored, for a second time! there was absolutely no reason besides the fact that i maybe hit a sensitive spot when i said that 20 dead by tanks and mortars means 88 executed at close range.
And quoting Lavrov:
"On the massacre in Houla, Lavrov said some victims had been killed at close range in a district controlled by opposition militants."
Since the rebels controlled the zone, and regime troops were kept at distance by the rebels, how could they have gone "from house to house" like it was reported, to execute these people without rebels reacting? Especially knowing that it took several hours.
The way i see it only the FSA can be responsible for that hideous massacre, probably the killed people had rejected the rebels and were punished for that. Other villagers are either with the rebels or too scared to talk or both.
I don't admire the assad regime, it IS ugly in so many ways, but the FSA is clearly way uglier.