منصور: لا يجب استبعاد أي دولة اذا تقرر انجاح جنيف-2

Masour Says All Countries Should Participate in Geneva II to Guarantee its Success.

what about Sri Lanka?

Pretty much of the time I am in disagreement with Mansour, but today's statement as far as I am concerned makes sense. If the KSA and Iran are involved in Syria's brutal civil war, then they should be both allowed to participate in the Geneva Talks. Nothing can replace dialog and straight talk between parties, specially when it is co-chaired by impartial players. many solutions were found to many of the world's stickiest problems during such meetings, many times in corridors. we are human beings after all, nothing could after all replace dialog, not even guns and bombs.

The biggest curse that occured to lebanon was when the syrians and the palestinians arrived in lebanon before that we had a beautiful country where everybody lived as lebanese .

(1). @WL, I do get your drift brother, and to be honest, me too would dearly wish to see the back of Bachar. However we need to be pragmatic, the situation in Syria is such that at least for now, no one could push the other out. here too, good reasons exist, the KSA, Qatar, Turkey and the West side with the Syrian rebels, when on the other side, Iran, Russia, Iraq's government and Hezbollah side with the regime. Ideally speaking, and why I would encourage dialog, it's because primarily to create that vital element called Exit Strategy, I am a firm believer in this principle and for good reasons, mainly because it does alleviate the burden and the deaths on the people.

(2). @WL. Then, it further goes to assure people like Al Assad, that their best route would be to leave power when all sides have agreed on an interim or transitional period where Al Assad eventually hands over power to an interim administration made up of all the warring Syrian sides which would then oversee fresh elections in which all sides would be fairly represented. Only strong and impartial brokers could make this happen, which is why I keep saying that both the KSA and Iran have a crucial role to play. In fact, when the Syrian conflict began about 3 years ago, Mr. Lakhdar Ebrahimi was adamant to create this Exit Strategy for Bachar early on, sadly no one listened then, and the rest we now know. Dictators at the end of the day are humans, they fear reprisals, in my opinion there come times when some compromise must be done, for the best interest of both nation and folks.

these talks about who should participate are just another diversion to win/lose time. The all idea of geneva1 is stupid, no agreement possible anyway, Farsis and their lackeys in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq just understand the language of force...

what an idiot and an iranian parrot this guy is.

common Mansour, cut to the chase. We all know that only two countries are needed to attend Geneva to assure its success: Iran and HA. Or just Iran as it will represent HA.