قاووق يؤكد أن تدخل حزب الله في سوريا جاء "بقرار لبناني مئة بالمئة": عزز قوة لبنان
Read this story in English
أكد نائب رئيس المجلس التنفيذي في حزب الله الشيخ نبيل قاووق أن تدخل حزب الله في سوريا جاء "بقرار لبناني مئة بالمئة"، معتبرا أنه "خدمة للبنانيين وعزز من قوة لبنان في مواجهة التكفيريين".
وقال قاووق خلال احتفال أقامه الحزب في بلدة الخيام الأحد "تدخل حزب الله في سوريا هو خدمة للبنانيين وشعوب المنطقة والأمة جمعاء، لأن خطر التكفيريين هو خطر على جميع اللبنانيين وشعوب المنطقة والأمة".
وأكد أن "الإرهاب التكفيري هو شر مطلق، لا خير فيه لأي طائفة أو مذهب أو أي فئة وهو تهديد للسنة والشيعة والدروز والمسيحيين على حد سواء".
وإذ لفت الى أن "هدف المشروع التكفيري، كان إشعال الفتنة من خلال اعتداءاتهم في المناطق اللبنانية"، أكد قاووق أن "لبنان أقوى من الفتنة، ومن داعش والنصرة وكل التيارات التكفيرية".
وخلص قاووق الى القول أن "تدخل حزب الله في سوريا هو مصلحة لبنانية مئة بالمئة، وبقرار لبناني مئة بالمئة، وقد استطاع هذا التدخل أن يعزز من قوة لبنان في مواجهة التكفيريين".
ويشارك حزب الله في القتال الى جانب النظام في سوريا ويسقط له عدد من القتلى في صفوفه. الامر الذي يعارضه عليه أفرقاء سياسيين يكررون دعواتهم له بالانسحاب منها
وشهد لبنان معارك دامية بدات في آب الفائت في عرسال اثر اقتحام تنظيمات متطرفة البلدة اشتبكت مع الجيش وأخذت معها أسرى ما زالوا حتى الساعة محتجزين لديها. وبعد عرسال شهدت مدينة طرابلس كما بلدات الشمال لا سيما بحنين وعكار اشتباكات عنيفة بين الجيش ومجموعات مسلحة تعتبر ان قتال الحزب في سوريا هو ضد "أهل السنة".
م.ن.
21:59 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 09
63
I know at least 100 people who are against your intervention in Syria! So your theory of 100% support just got discredited
13:24 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
03
http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/two-thirds-lebanese-christians-believe-hezbollah-protecting-lebanon-survey
15:22 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
20
@Mowaten: Technically, 2/3 is still 66.6%, not 100.
Another note: Admittedly, a lot of people became more favourable of Hizb's intervention in Syria after the Jihadists attacked Lebanon in Arsal and Akkar. But before that, even Hizb supporters who are not sheer brainwashed zombies were against Hizb's role.
And finally, Hizb was the best friend of Nusra when it came to recruitment: Hundreds of former FSA troopers defected to Nusra and ISIL et al when Hizb publicly announced their involvement.
And today, Hizb is simply dependent on the existence of the likes of ISIL and Nusra to justify their continued crimes - neither of which terrorist groups existed before Hizb got involved.
15:29 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
01
i didnt answer his 100% support claim, because it's plain BS and didnt think anyone would take him seriously on that. but since it seems some are slower than others: nobody ever said HA had 100% support.
15:31 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
01
-"Hizb supporters who are not sheer brainwashed zombies were against Hizb's role"
yea? where did you find those? in deir el salib as well? please share your sources
15:33 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
01
"And finally, Hizb was the best friend of Nusra when it came to recruitment: Hundreds of former FSA troopers defected to Nusra and ISIL et al when Hizb publicly announced their involvement. "
FSA/nusra: same/same, different names. the FSA is the "politically correct" face for foreign powers to send in weapons, before they resurface in IS/nusra hands a few weeks later.
15:35 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
01
"And today, Hizb is simply dependent on the existence of the likes of ISIL and Nusra to justify their continued crimes"
oh is that the new anti-HA song? sounds a lot like last year's ("HA is dependent on israel to justify its weapons")
seems like HA is always dependent on so many things, must be a full time job to create israel + nusra + isis only to fight them and justify being...
"neither of which terrorist groups existed before Hizb got involved."
hahhaha yea. dude, you know nusra and isis are creations of ISI and qaeda right? oh, actually no you dont
22:03 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 09
43
They need to keep telling themselves this so they don't weep at the colossal mess they're gotten us and themselves into.
15:40 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
01
Ah good old Qaouk, speaks to his mirror yet sees the mirror nodding its approval. It's a pity though, to see what was once a seemingly noble and powerful resistance become so spiteful, it's top cadres can say what takes their fancy, but facts are facts, and nothing they'll say can convince anymore: No one who gets into such a fratricidal war like the one in Syria can claim to come out stronger, facts is, the opposite is more like the truth. I'll repeat it, it's a real pity, for if we had pooled our resources as Lebanese, as one people following one aim and one goal instead of such myopic sectarian policies, who would dare shake us?
19:34 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
01
If not for the intervention, then Lebanon would've been overrun with IS, Nusra and all the other takfiri factions today.
20:28 ,2014 تشرين الثاني 10
11
I have no idea why M8 and their supporters have to defend their actions in Syria over and over again with their absolute disinformation garbage. The whole world knows unequivocally there were no ISIS or Nusra in Syria prior to HA intervention. If your actions were so righteous and honorable you wouldn't have to defend them with absolute and constant lies right? Or do you simply believe if you repeat your own lies enough times you will start believing it's the truth and absolve yourselves from guilt?
