جعجع رأى أن إجراء الانتخابات وفقاً لقانون الستين "خيانة عظمى": خطوة حكومة تصريف الاعمال "مسرحية"

In the end, I have to admit Gaegae is/was right. How can a caretaker government approve yesterday the electoral committee to oversea the elections under the 1960 law, when the same government ( prior to its resignation) failed to approve the same. How can we forget the FPM minister saying in that infamous cabinet meeting 2-3 months ago: " No Ashraf (referring to Rifi) and No Ishraaf (referring to the committee overseeing the election"?

It appears from the beginning, the FPM and its allies were planning to have the elections according to the 1960 law or a parliament extension. Protecting Christians rights huh..:)

The elections should go forward ... It is painfully obvious that the current leadership namely Mikati and Suleiman need to be replaced with leaders that will take charge of the security forces and place them in a proactive stance.

Tripoli has been raging for weeks yet this leadership has done nothing to halt the violence. Many steps could have been taken including a curfew and warrants for arrest of known perpetrators. Instead Mikati and Suleiman use the situation in Tripoli to benefit chaos.

Suleiman is a tool of foreign interests. The killings in Arsal show all the signs of a special ops detail by foreign forces. As and you say he says nothing ...

Then there is Tripoli where many measures including a curfew and arrest warrants could be implemented. Suleiman has abandoned his loyalty to the Army for the agents foreign and domestic who wish to inflame Lebanon.

So this is how the traitor Dr. Arreet 7akeh justifies his act of treason! amn al moujtama3 al massi7i tole3 art 7akeh bi art 7akeh. wlak min addak ya 7ak...awati ya dajjal?

thw1phoenix vs mckini debate, there you have it, parties outside Lebanon sowing discord and then using people inside Lebanon to try and control the discord according to their own objectives and agendas. In the end, Lebanon loses and Israel wins. It's been that way since 1948 and it will continue be that way for a long,long time barring environmental catastrophe, a nuclear accident/war or the descent of the United States into anarchy.

This absolutist position is not good in a fluid situation. One must be flexible in order to react well to changing circumstances. For sure the LF should not boycott. This is the worst option as it gives the field to M8 -- Hwzbollah a nd FPM by default. In Egypt, the democratic forces didn't like the constitution and so boycotted the vote, and the measure passed by a large margin, making it firmly rooted. A boycott would not be a loss of Christian political power, but a surrender without a fight.

I always emailed this blog post page to all my contacts, as
if like to read it then my contacts will too.