Geagea Says 'at Same Distance from All Parties, including Hizbullah'
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةLebanese Forces leader and presidential candidate Samir Geagea on Tuesday announced that he stands “at the same distance” from all political parties, including Hizbullah and the Free Patriotic Movement, while accusing FPM's supporters of twisting his remarks about his meeting with former premier Saad Hariri.
“I don't think I was misunderstood, but some parties deliberately interpreted my remarks in that manner, as (FPM chief) General (Michel) Aoun's supporters are really wishing to obtain the support of the March 14 forces and ex-PM Hariri for their candidate and they're hoping Aoun will be elected president,” Geagea said in an interview in Paris with Radio Orient.
Remarks attributed to Geagea by some media outlets had caused confusion on Monday and prompted the LF to describe them as “incorrect, curtailed and totally inaccurate.”
He was quoted as saying that Hariri suggested during their Paris meeting the possibility of endorsing Aoun as a “consensual” candidate. But during his press conference, Geagea clarified that Hariri only raised the issue of Aoun's nomination as one of several "possibilities."
In his Tuesday interview, the LF leader stressed that the coming president must “enjoy the confidence of the Lebanese people in addition to popular support and representation.”
In response to a question, Geagea stressed that he stands “at the same distance” from all political parties, “including Hizbullah and the FPM.”
“But that does not prevent me from having my own presidential program which some parties might like and others may not like,” Geagea added.
Asked whether his suggestion on “building the state” involves prohibiting Hizbullah from using its weapons, Geagea said: “No one has the right to possess arms in Lebanon, not Hizbullah nor any similar group, as the very nature of the state cannot bear the presence of alternative authorities operating in the same country.”
“I believe that the presidential palace is the most secure place in Lebanon,” Geagea said in response to another question on whether security concerns will prevent him from reaching the Baabda Palace.
The LF leader stressed that Lebanon needs a strong president who has a clear program.
“We've had enough of presidents who get elected to manage the crisis. We need a president who would start finding solutions to our crisis, as we cannot continue in the same manner,” he noted.
In the first parliamentary session to elect a president on April 23, Geagea only managed to garner 48 votes, falling short of the 86 votes needed by any candidate to emerge victorious in the first round. The March 8 forces forced a lack of quorum in the three other sessions that were scheduled.
President Michel Suleiman's tenure ends on May 25.
Y.R.
S.D.B.
Very interesting and credible, all of it. It is scary and sad that the killing machine in operating at will and we have to play nice and believe the operators and their partners but not our own eyes. Killing a man like Shattah is reaching a new low. I always enjoy your intelligent and unbiased posts. Thank you for sharing.
Karim, let us say that we took your words in good faith, fine, but then, what would that leave Michel Aoun with? Loyal Syrian, Iranian, Hezbollah servant? Or masalan if we took another case, in this case Frangieh, would he stand any chance other than being labelled the same as Aoun? It caught my attention the other day when different people were interviewed about what kind of president they wanted to have, most said they wanted a strong president and here again most mentioned either Geagea, then Aoun then Frangieh, is this what people see as STRONG? Much to my surprise none even bothered mentioning sane people like Demianos, or Baroud or Harb or at least one of the many qualified and decent people we still have around. That by merit alone means that almost all of Lebanese society is in desperate need of a cure, a cure that is I am afraid not yet available in our pharmacies.
It is not credible that Geagea is equal distance from all parties in Lebanon. He is not a consensus candidate, but is a candidate willing to engage the electoral process. What does this mean? It means that he is willing to accept that 63 Deputies will vote for someone else and he will take office with 65 Deputies voting for his election. consensus, on the other hand means that all political parties and faction agree to the one candidate. It is not democratic at all, as any one who does not agree can deny the choice of the majority.
The US Presidency is won by election through majority vote, not consensus. Is Lebanon more democratic than the US??
No Mystic, not that it's got anything to do with Geagea, but the fall you're talking about pertains to the fall of an entire nation that was already on its knees.
phoenix my friend, if you refer to Geagea as the entire nation, then i feel sad for you brother.
Geagea in presenting his program stated that he would work with ha to integrate it into the state. Everything else was about the social, educational and economic reform of the country. He was attacked as being years too late by flame as this is identical to aoun's MOU. he also specifically identified our southern areas as the ones in greatest need and therefore would gain the most, he also extended an olive branch to all parties HA included to present and discuss his program. All but HA accepted. He has not made any reference to conflict or aggression but rather mutual agreement on HA's arms. This has been his stance for the past 9 years. The fact he doesn't sugar coat his comments may hurt some feelings but his course and language has always been for the peace and stability of the country. In fact he is better placed than most to finding a solution for our illegal arms problem since he controlled the strongest militia and actively sought diplomatic means.
Yet despite the Shias direct benefit from such program's ha has refused to meet with LF or do their national duties in providing a platform for the successful nomination of a president. All this because he will work with them to integrate into the state. Despite their direct and indirect benefits from a strong economy, educational system and state. Imagine what they would do if demanded to integrate? Food for thought on the real motives.
Equally as beautiful is aoun starting a war that killed thousands of Christians in the name of no militias, runs away leaving his men to die senselessly and on his return sides with the only remaining militia in the country. JUST BEAUTIFUL