ISG calls on Lebanese authorities to lift obstacles hindering port probe

W460

The International Support Group for Lebanon has marked the third anniversary of the catastrophic explosion at the Port of Beirut on 4 August 2020 by expressing solidarity with the families of the victims and with those whose lives, homes, and livelihoods were “severely affected by this tragic event.”

“Three years since this deadly explosion left over 220 people dead, and many thousands injured and rendered homeless, the families of the victims and the Lebanese people are left wanting for truth, justice and accountability,” the ISG said in a statement.

Lamenting the lack of progress in the judicial proceedings, the ISG called on the Lebanese authorities to “lift all obstacles hindering the pursuit of justice and facilitate the completion of an impartial, thorough and transparent investigation.”

“Ensuring judicial accountability and combating impunity is integral to restoring the credibility of Lebanon’s state institutions. The stalemate in the port explosion investigation underscores the urgent need to safeguard the independence, impartiality and integrity of the Lebanese judiciary,” it said.

The members of the ISG also called on the Lebanese parliament to “accelerate the adoption of necessary legislation to strengthen the independence of the judiciary in line with international standards,” while pledging that they continue to “stand by Lebanon and its people.”

The International Support Group brings together the U.N. and the governments of China, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the UK and the U.S., together with the European Union and the Arab League.  It was launched in September 2013 by the U.N. Secretary-General with former President Michel Suleiman to help mobilize support and assistance for Lebanon’s stability, sovereignty and state institutions.

SourceNaharnet
Comments 1
Thumb i.report 04 August 2023, 01:36

Think tanks like this ISG are corrupt because they are influenced (and financed) by special interest groups, corporations, or political agendas, compromising their independence and objectivity in research and policy recommendations.