U.N. Investigators Decry Syria 'War Crimes', Eye Damascus Visit

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The members of a U.N. probe into rights abuses in Syria on Thursday said "crimes against humanity" and "war crimes" were happening in the country, and said they were trying to set up a visit to Damascus.

One of the newest members of the four-person team, renowned former war crimes prosecutor Carla del Ponte, told reporters in Geneva that "crimes against humanity and war crimes for sure" were being committed in Syria.

Del Ponte, who was yanked out of retirement late last month to join the U.N.'s Commission of Inquiry on Syria, said she would participate in the general investigation of tracking and documenting serious rights violations, but that she would perhaps focus most on determining "the high-ranking political and military figures (responsible for) these crimes."

Paulo Pinheiro, the Brazilian head of the commission, meanwhile said the investigators had sent a letter to Syrian President Bashar Assad seeking access to the country.

"We expect that he will accept us in Damascus," he said.

The commission was created a just over a year ago, but has yet to actually gain access to Syria.

It has however conducted more than 1,000 interview with perpetrators and victims in the conflict, and has previously reported that war crimes appeared to have been committed by both the regime and, to a lesser extent, rebel forces.

Comments 2
Default-user-icon + oua nabka + (Guest) 25 October 2012, 13:02

war by itself is a crime against humanity , and the one who should be judged are the countries that produce weapons in the world and it happenn=s to be the 5 permenant in the UN that are the most countries to make weapons so they are these 5 countries committing crime against humanity

Thumb chrisrushlau 25 October 2012, 21:58

It is convenient as well as efficient for the main perpetrators of crimes against international humanitarian law to sponsor investigations of such crimes. The risk of being accused by their own investigators is not zero, but acceptably low. The prestige value by which citizens of the perpetrator states and those of the victim states see that crime is rewarded and righteousness punished is worth the investment and the slight risk.